Monday, 21 August 2017

The quickening

The gun-control lobby is in full swing as gang-land and terrorist gun crime continues to increase. Yet its position is inherently and fundamentally flawed. Seizing legally held (read White-owned) guns and/or imposing more restrictive licensing requirements will have almost zero impact on gun deaths because terrorists, gangsters and ghetto thugs can always get their hands on guns. Neither Khaled the Camel Humper nor Quantavius in the ghetto will be deterred by the need for a gun license. ("By the Beard Of Allah my gun license has expired. Cancel the attack!"). Surely even the most deluded, febrile SJW can see that? But of course the gun control agenda has nothing to do with reducing murders. It's about disarming law-abiding Whites.

Am I alone in thinking that this is another sign of a general quickening? Not just gun control but all elements of the anti-White project seem to have suddenly gone into overdrive. Third World immigration, the spread of "hate" (read anti-White) legislation, the blocking of pro-White websites, White displacement in the workplace, antifa aggression and provocations, depravity and degeneration in the public sphere, the rewriting of history.

It's like the way the flow of a river speeds up as it approaches a cataract waterfall. It's a good analogy because it seems we are headed towards some precipitous event, the nature and outcome of which, to me at least, are unknown.

Saturday, 19 August 2017

Daily Stormer back

Daily Stormer back (for now anyway until the "liberals" - you know, the free speech people - bring it down again.  http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/

Friday, 18 August 2017

A costly piece of ass

I notice that the team which drove a car into those people in Barcelona came from Morocco. Sorry for the kuffars who got squashed but to me it's still a small price to pay for the joys of diversity. Back home in Morocco a gang of 'youths' occupied their time waiting to join us in Europe by engaging in sexual congress with....a donkey. I must admit that when I saw the Sex With A Donkey headline I thought it might be Katie Price or Lena Dunham but no, it referred to the Sons Of Allah doing their thing. (And they say Muslims don't love animals.) All had a good time including it would seem the donkey itself whose name has not been published to protect its identity.

The only problem was that, like all sluts she was carrying a disease. In this case the deadly rabies. The lovers are now being treated in hospital while local police are, according to the Express "appealing to anyone else who 'approached' or 'admired' the donkey in order to stop the spread of disease".

I hope these fine young men make a full recovery and join us here in Europe as soon as possible. And in the interim hone their driving skills.

Monday, 14 August 2017

Don't feed the bears

If you've ever gone to a wildlife park or nature reserve you're sure to have seen signs instructing you to not feed the wild animals. And there's a good reason for this. Feeding them makes us feel good but longer term the practice has negative ramifications for the animals. Over time they become dependent on humans and neglect survival instincts honed over thousands of years. For instance bears over time will shorten their hibernation period while their hunting and foraging skills deteriorate. With more r-selected species human feeding promotes spectacular population growth.

All of which is ok until something goes wrong and humans can no longer improve nature. This could - and does - happen in the case of bears when the parks are cut off by heavy snow or other adverse natural conditions. In such circumstances large numbers of them starve or freeze to death. In the case of over-population natural calamities such as drought will result in a large die-off of the affected species.

I thought of this when reading an article by some Irish philanthropist who focuses on Ethiopia. ("I have two adopted Ethiopian daughters" he reminds us frequently). Apparently that country is yet again headed for famine.  Insert boilerplate cut-and-paste doom porn here 'worst crisis in living memory, millions will die.....unless you send money NOW'. You know the drill. This guy should have heeded what Charles Darwin wrote many years ago. “One day something brought to my recollection Malthus’s “Principles of Population”. I thought of  his clear exposition of “the positive checks to increase”–disease, accidents, war, and famine–which keep down the population of savage races to so much lower an average than that of civilised peoples."

You see, since the time of the 1985 Ethiopian Crisis (which Bob Geldof exploited to relaunch his failing career) that country's population has tripled! Yes, tripled, from 32 million in 1975 to 101.4 million today. Any chance that this has something to do with the famine? Learning: Don't feed the bears.

And here's another learning: "Liberal" virtue-signallers are the worst hypocrites on the planet. Deep down they know that encouraging Ethiopians to breed at unsustainable levels inevitably leads to vastly greater suffering than had nature been allowed to take its course. But virtue-signalling to their peers trumps all. And now of course the reviled Whitey is being called on to once again rescue the situation. For all the thanks we'll get.

Friday, 11 August 2017

Welcome James to the land of the Red Pill

A few observations on the case of James Damore, the guy fired by ('do no evil') Google for circulating a document full of Hate Facts. And the first observation is that a factually-based, logically-argued proposition will not save you. Because the shrieking libtard/feminazi alliance are not interested in either facts or logic and in all probability won't even have read the material. And, as I noted in the previous post, claiming to be a GoodWhite who loves diversity, multiculturalism, feminism, blacks, gays, Jews and every other victim group will not alone fail to protect you but for some unexplained reason will further inflame the baying mob. Same with apologies and recantations. They won't save you.

All of this must have come as news to poor James, the nerdish GoodWhite. But even in the short time since his firing you can see the change that's coming over him. In his interview with Stefan Molyneux he's baffled by his predicament as the truth almost painfully dawns on him. But since then he's clearly taken the red pill and, as his new tee-shirt illustrates, his former loyalty to Google has disappeared.

And on that point each of us can do our bit by removing this evil company from our lives as far as we can. Possibilities include using Mozilla Firefox, Bing, Yahoo or a meta search-engine (which uses/leverages other search sites including Google and Yahoo) like Searx. When your mobile is due an upgrade choose Apple or Galaxy. I'm actively looking at alternative platforms for this blog, but one that won't mean losing what's on Blogger. (It's for the children, you understand).

Bear in mind that Google is going into overdrive on the anti-White project since that Indian coolie was made CEO. They've gone well beyond relegating sites like this to the bottom of the search queue. For example their new AI 'hate' checker rates "All conservative American Christian males should be put in labor camps" as 10 percent toxic while "All conservative Israeli male Jews should be put in labor camps" is rated as 83 percent toxic. Or, and this is brilliant, Google "happy American family", go to images, scroll down. And realise the extent to which they're fucking with our minds.

Finally a word on that Indian CEO and the army of HB1 visa holders (90% men, by the way) he's using to replace the White American workforce. India, where half the population is starving, turds everywhere you step. Where rivers are filled with shit, human corpses, dead animals..... and bathing humans. Where advanced degrees can be purchased for a few dollars and every single person is out to defraud you. Despite the glossy propaganda it's a corrupt and impoverished failure. You have to wonder how companies like Google will end up as they use such people and AA diversity drones to replace the productive White engineers who built the company.

Monday, 7 August 2017

Grovelling and recantations, all to no avail.

"I am not rescuing anything as it is over for me professionally as far as I can see - I am very, very sorry that I should have offended them. I do offer an apology for no other reason than out of genuine contrition for the hurt I have caused them...I am the author of my own misfortunes, I am the master of my soul and I must answer for what I've done. I must do nothing that will bring ruin or unhappiness to other people."

Kevin Myers, 'disgraced' Irish journalist (His crime? Pointing out that two Jewish women were Jews.)

“I Kamenev, together with Zinoviev and Trotsky, organised and guided this conspiracy. My motives? I had become convinced that the party’s – Stalin’s policy – was successful and victorious. We, the opposition, had banked on a split in the party, but this hope proved groundless. We could no longer count on any serious domestic difficulties to allow us to overthrow Stalin’s leadership. We were actuated by boundless hatred and by lust of power.”

Lev Kamenev, 'disgraced' former USSR Politburo member. (His crime? He offended Stalin)

Is there not an eerie resonance here? And also with their post-recantation treatment with both suffering immediate execution. Literally in Kamenev's case, metaphorically in the case of Myers. It's worth noting that, contrary to popular perception, the Russo-European Communist bloc did not (apart from the period of Stalin's purges) exercise power by way of mass executions. Instead citizens were cowed and controlled by round-the-clock surveillance which tracked every heretical word and thought. Offenders - apart from the more serious ones - were punished by way of losing their jobs and/or humiliated in the media.

Little wonder then that the term Political Correctness originated in that environment. And, in mutated form, still lives on today.

Friday, 4 August 2017

Legal justice in today's Britain

For centuries British legal principles have been an inspiration to legislators throughout the world. But along with everything else in that betrayed country they too have been sacrificed to the gods of diversity. Just read the following legal monstrosity as embodied in the College Of Policing's Hate Crime Operational Guidance.
"For recording purposes, the perception of the victim, or any other person .... is the defining factor in determining whether an incident is a hate incident, or in recognising the hostility element of a hate crime. The victim does not have to justify or provide evidence of their belief, and police officers or staff should not directly challenge this perception. Evidence of the hostility is not required for an incident or crime to be recorded as a hate crime or hate incident." [My emphasis]

Could a more outrageous or egregious example of legislative (mis)guidance be imagined? Illegality is determined by the perception of the 'victim' rather than on the legal text and the associated case law. Under such a system a 'victim' could deem any innocuous comment or even a compliment from a White man as 'hateful'.  "I like your outfit" could be deemed as hateful by a 'victim' because....well, just because. And the 'victim' doesn't have  to provide any supporting evidence! How cool is that? 

A ten year-old child wouldn't come up with such nonsense yet in fact it emanated from one of Britain's most decorated judgesAnd it was not nonsensical really. It was another string to the bow of White civilisational destruction wrought by traitors in our midst. It's been successful. As the following illustrates.

Wednesday, 2 August 2017

Comedy gold coming our way

They say that comedy is dead and it might well be. I'm in no position to judge as I no longer watch TV or movies. No surprise if it is because SJWs recoil from it like vampires before a crucifix.  Humour and political correctness are mortal enemies. But hope is at hand and from the unlikely source of Jeff Bezos' Amazon History Channel. (Incidentally if we're ever invaded by aliens I propose sending Jeff to meet them as they'd think he's one of them).

Reparations traces the history of a three State republic gifted to liberated slaves at the end of the American Civil War. As 'reparations' for slavery.  Constantly attacked by an aggressive White America, the black republic (Colonia - why not just Colon?) nonetheless fights back and with the application of typical black characteristics - technical ingenuity, Teutonic work ethic, integrity and a talent for strategic institution-building - Colonia overcomes all odds and after 150 years become an economic and scientific powerhouse as White America 'struggles to stay afloat'.

Pure Comedy Gold. Tears will roll down our faces, we'll slap our thighs, our sides will ache as we're convulsed with mirth. Thanks Jeff, we need a laugh.  Although it's serious as well. Director Will Packer says the project  involves “bringing on the appropriate historians to make sure we are telling the story in an accurate and responsible way,” Wow!  

Actually Mr. Director I can be of help here. Because you already have the perfect template for the series. A country which was established by and for liberated American slaves after the Civil War, a country that in terms of natural resources was much wealthier than the Mississippi Delta, that got a head start with a major cash infusion from White America. Mr. Packer, I have just saved you a lot of time, money and effort. It's all here for you.

Sunday, 30 July 2017

Ireland of the cucks

As far as I can judge there have been ten fatal accidents in Ireland in the last two weeks. These include six road fatalities, three drownings and one involving a farm tractor. Each of these - with one exception - got just passing reference in the national media. 'Man killed in two-car collision has been named as.....'. That kind of thing.  The exception relates to the drowning of young "Irish" boy Damola Adetosoye in the river Shannon, an event which attracted fevered coverage on national media, coast-to-coast TV and more. Locals were trotted out to deliver encomiums ('A Champion In Heaven': Tributes paid to teenage boy who drowned in River Shannon), the details of the accident were played out at length and the performance was repeated nation-wide when he was planted a few days later.

Clearly this was a nucular fizzizist or brain surjun in the making. Or maybe not. Because despite a plethora of signs warning of dangerous waters he nonetheless jumped in and sank like a stone. Yet Longford County Council were widely blamed. According to one local dog-collar 'the accident could and should have been avoided'. He was right. It would have been avoided had the knuckle-head taken notice of the multiple warning signs.  

How cucked can a country get? What has rotten our souls to the point that we mourn the loss of a Nigerian ahead of our own people? 

And today we learn that veteran gadfly journalist Kevin Myers has been fired from the Irish edition of the London Times (the Oirish Toimes) for an outlandish anti-Semitic attack on two BBC "journalists".  

Sunday Times Ireland columnist Kevin Myers will not write again for the paper, a spokesman said. The newspaper said it abhorred anti-Semitism after Mr Myers noted that two of the best-paid female presenters at the BBC, Claudia Winkleman and Vanessa Feltz, were Jewish in an article on the corporation's gender pay gap. Myers wrote: "Good for them. Jews are not generally noted for their insistence on selling their talent for the lowest possible price, which is the most useful measure there is of inveterate, lost-with-all-hands stupidity."

Sunday Times editor Martin Ivens has apologised personally to the two women for these "unacceptable comments both to Jewish people and to women in the workplace". A spokesperson said: "We can confirm that Kevin Myers will not write again for The Sunday Times Ireland. "A printed apology will appear in next week's paper."

Yup, that's correct. He got fired for noting that the Jewish women were Jews. But the reaction isn't as crazy as it sounds. An old Russian proverb says something to the effect that you can deliver any insult to a Jew. Apart from calling him a Jew.

The Fighting Irish? Gone with the wind. A relic of our past.  If you doubt me read the comments at the link above.

Saturday, 29 July 2017

Dykes versus kikes: When victims fall out

Did you see where some Jewish lesbians were ejected from Chicago’s Dyke March for brandishing Stars of David/‘Pride’ flags? One report (in I think the Jerusalem Post) juxtaposed a picture of the ejected and dejected dykes with a group of concentration camp inmates. I quite literally laughed out loud. And have you heard the story of Professor Brett Weinstein of Evergreen University in Washington? He's the guy who objected to being excluded from campus by minorities because he's White. 'But I'm not White!' he protests, 'I'm Jewish, an oppressed minority like you'. Too bad, the other oppressed minorities didn't appreciate the distinction and the Prof was metaphorically thrown under the bus by both students and administration. He's now suing the university for nearly $4 million.

 Oy vey, the sufferink! What's happening to the Most Oppressed People Ever (MOPE)? What's happening is that the brilliant Jewish wheeze whereby they played both sides of 'being White' is running out of road. But what a wheeze it was. Best of both worlds. Playing the White card enabled them to get away with being vastly over-represented in finance, media, universities and politics. For instance Jews are over-represented by a factor of about 10 in Harvard but disguise this by appearing in the White cohort. Then, cuckoo-like, pushing out actual Whites who are under-represented by a similar ratio. In addition playing White enables them to pass self-serving and anti-White legislation ('hate', human rights, immigration) under the guise of universal altruistic principles and to infiltrate and subvert genuinely pro-White organisations.

It's history repeating itself. They had a good thing going but pushed and pushed until they generated blow-back. Their scheming has created an America where blacks, Hispanics and Asians are displacing Whites at a stunning rate. Which was the whole idea. The problem is that their Frankenstein monsters have no sympathy for or affinity with Jews. They don't - unlike Whites - buy into their bogus victim narrative fact they see them as representing the worst aspects of White privilege. As the self-proclaimed progressive and Cultural Marxist Prof. Weinstein will now ruefully testify. In any event there are so many vibrants in the West now - thanks to immigration 'reform' - that they feel free to put 'people who look like them' in power. And Jews don't look lie them.

Hostile Indians (feather) are coming over the hill from the other side as well. The 'all Whites as evil oppressors' meme has become too successful and is now leading to blow-back from Whites, fed up with the vilification and ever-increasing demands of  non-White victim groups. Trump's election is but one symptom, in part reflecting the increasing White understanding of the treachery visited upon them by their hostile elites.

It's an exquisite irony that Jews are now impaled on a hook of their own making. They should have learned that apparatchiks were the first victims of the Red Revolution. How will they respond? Well one response will be to increasingly identify as White. We can see this already with the likes of Michael Savage, Milo whats-his-name, Stefan Molyneux and an awful lot more. Whites should welcome loose tactical alliances but must be aware of the infiltrate and subvert strategy which could see us lose control of our movement the way Jews are now losing control of theirs.

Unlike them make sure that we actually do learn from history.

Tuesday, 25 July 2017

The Strange Myopia of Douglas Murray

From Amazon: "The Strange Death of Europe is a highly personal account of a continent and culture caught in the act of suicide. Declining birth-rates, mass immigration and cultivated self-distrust and self-hatred have come together to make Europeans unable to argue for themselves and incapable of resisting their own comprehensive change as a society. This book is not only an analysis of demographic and political realities, but also an eyewitness account of a continent in self-destruct mode. It includes reporting from across the entire continent, from the places where migrants land to the places they end up, from the people who appear to welcome them in to the places which cannot accept them."

I just finished reading it and that summary is, for Amazon, pretty fair.

The author traces in great detail and with increasing horror the stunning scale and speed of the demographic and social transformation besetting Europe. He rips into politicians and the media for their duplicitous role in this transformation. He challenges 'liberals' and feminists on their inherently nonsensical and hypocritical support for immigrants who bring their illiberal and anti-feminine practises with them. He devotes a full chapter to demolishing political correctness, its bogus rationalisations, intolerance and falsification of history, and cleverly shows how these pathologies lead to authorities turning a blind eye to multiple instances of Muslim child-abuse. He traces PC corruption from the highest levels of national Government to local government, the police, courts and social services agencies. I particularly like the way he demolishes, first, the fallacy that Britain 'has always been a nation of immigrants' and second the idea that we need immigrants because European women aren't having enough children, identifying 
more child-friendly social and economic policies and not more Muslim head-choppers as the solution.

All of this is powerful stuff, deeply researched and written with style. However there are two areas in which the book disappoints: First, explanations for how Europe's death came about and second his unqualified despair about the future. For this particular coroner 'cause of death' was suicide. Not murder.  “More than any other continent or culture in the world today, Europe is now deeply weighed down with guilt for its past.” And why is Europe deeply weighed down with guilt? Because.....well... Christianity. And the Holocau$t™.  The Jewish role, which was and remains central, is ignored apart from his shock at the part payed by European Jewish organisations in supporting the invasion. Shock because the invaders will not be pro-Jewish! (I took Fred Reed to task for a similar evasion some time ago.)

Does Douglas really not 'get it' about the Jews or is he just being cute? I suspect the latter. First because anybody taking even a cursory analysis of the subject couldn't fail to see it and second because Murray himself was pretty explicit in an article with the Jewish Chronicle. While taking care to proclaim his philo-semitism (and in a this-hurts-me-more-than-you tone) he nonetheless makes some hard points. Points which indicate that he does in fact 'get it'. He notes - sadly, he conveys - how phrases like ''one law for the Jews, another for the rest of us'', ''It's all very well for the Jews. They have Israel where only Jews can go and all the time they're destroying our own religious and racial identity in Europe'' and 'rootless cosmopolitans' are coming back into vogue. If nothing else this might give the nation-wreckers a few sleepless nights.

The only other complaint I have lies in his lack of hope, or any form of program to counter the 'strange death'. But I suppose his stated role has been to catalogue that death and he's done a hell of a good job on that. Will it make much difference? Well the book has sold and continues to sell in huge numbers on both sides of the Atlantic. Any non-awake reader will surely be jolted by its analysis and conclusions. Which is good. But bear in mind that Thilo Sarrazin did the same thing for Germany in books avidly read by millions of Germans. Who then went on to give Angela Merkel an even bigger share of their vote.

Maybe Murray's pessimism is justified after all.....

Friday, 21 July 2017

Ode To Joy

What's that creaking sound I hear? Why it's the Gates Of Hell opening up to receive a prized new entry. Yes, John McCain has been diagnosed with inoperable brain cancer and, all going well, will die in agony some time over the next few months. Now they say you shouldn't wish serious illness on anybody. Karma and all that. But why not wish the very worst on the very worst of psychopaths? And that's what McCain is. A depraved, malevolent, degenerate, lying sack of shit.

Far from being a war hero he met the legal definition of a traitor through having betrayed military secrets to Vietnam, America's enemy du jour. According to documents secured by Counter Punch, he divulged specific military information such as the aircraft carrier on which he was based, pilot casualties and morale, and information about rescue ships’ locations.

[From Counter Punch] McCain is often called a “war hero”, a title adorning an unlovely resume starting with a father who was an admiral and graduation fifth from the bottom at the US Naval Academy, where he earned the nickname “McNasty”. McCain flew 23 bombing missions over North Vietnam, each averaging about half an hour, total time ten hours and thirty minutes. For these brief excursions the admiral’s son was awarded two Silver Stars, two Legions of Merit, two Distinguished Flying Crosses, three Bronze Stars, the Vietnamese Legion of Honor and three Purple Hearts. US Veteran Dispatch calculates our hero earned a medal an hour, which is pretty good going.

Mired in corruption throughout his political life (Boeing, Jack Abrahamson, the Keating Five), he divorced the faithful wife who waited all the years he was in captivity and within a month married a billionaire's daughter. As a returned POW he made a mini career out of championing the rights of the missing in action (MIA). Until Big Business decided they wanted friendly relations with Vietnam, at which pointed he rounded on his erstwhile colleagues, using his influence to bring the initiative to a sudden close.

He was directly responsible for the deaths of 134 sailors and serious injuries (blown off arms, legs, blindness and burns) to another 161 sailors on the USS Forrestal after his bravado stunt went wrong. As the crew frantically tended to the dead and dying McCain, in direct contravention of Navy regulations, took himself off to the hospital area for treatment to his trivial injuries. And he got away with it, as he did with everything else, because his father (the guy who master-minded the USS Liberty cover-up) and grandfather were Navy 'royalty'. He fought tooth and nail, probably at the behest of his good pal Larry Silverstein, against any attempt to investigate the 9/11 false flag.

But McCain's worst sin of all has been his war-mongering. Libya, Kosovo, Serbia, Iraq, Syria, Ukraine, Georgia..... McCain was knee deep in the slaughter, cheering on aggression, doing everything in his power to prevent peaceful solutions. He has spent the last few years of his life trying to goad Russia into a war with NATO and America into war with Iran. Both instances capable of precipitating WW III. He literally has the blood of millions on his hands.

But you'd never know that from his fawning treatment in the MSM. Why? Well its's now quite clear to me that the Real Government organised candidates over whom they held the power of swift and total destruction. They know all their dirty secrets. The deal being, you do as we say, vote as we say, or we'll unleash our lapdog MSM on you.

So let's rejoice as this rancid little shit suffers a slow and agonising death awaiting his appointment with Lucifer. 

Tuesday, 18 July 2017

Your new All-American law enforcement officer

Take a sub-70 IQ black Muslim from Planet Of The Apes Somalia, give him a gun and tell him to go out and control the kuffars. What could possibly go wrong? Well quite a lot actually.  Mohammed Noor hardly had his sandals under the patrol car dash before the complaints - all from terrified White women - began to pour in. From false imprisonment to battery, assault, negligence, violating civil rights and violently transporting an innocent woman her against her will......the new All-American LEO (pictured here with his All-American family) let it all hang out

But the police force, headed up by an AA mystery meat lesbian straight from central casting, kept him on duty. An even more serious incident was inevitable and it duly arrived a few days ago. Taking exception to a kuffarette who had dialled 911  (because she was wearing pyjamas in public?) he blazed away at her from the passenger seat of the patrol car, killing her instantly. According to the Mail Online "Noor, 31, has offered his condolences but demanded people respect his privacy".  

Did you get that? He's demanding that people respect his privacy! For a retard he's learning fast. So yes folks, America has now reached the stage where Stone Age Somali Muslim cops are shooting unarmed and innocent White women. Which raises the question: When will patriotic Americans meaningfully begin to fight back?

Saturday, 15 July 2017

Andy goes to charm school

Andy Murray is an immensely talented tennis player but in terms of charm...well he's been described as ‘duller than a weekend in Worthing’ - the notoriously boring British seaside town. However he's become an overnight hero with the chattering classes after what's been described as a 'courageous' (sic) intervention during a post-match interview. Here's the (so-called) Independent on it:  "Andy Murray wins praise for taking on 'casual sexism' in press conference following Wimbledon defeat.  Murray corrected a reporter who overlooked the success of female American players. A journalist began asking Murray a question, saying: “Sam is the first US player to reach a major semi-final since 2009”, only to be interrupted by the player. “Male player,” Murray reminded him.

Naturally enough this had the luvvies clucking their approval and the 'correction' (more accurately pedantic point-scoring as everyone knew what the reporter meant) was given banner headlines in the MSM. But while he might have burnished his feminist credentials he fell down badly on two other vital virtue-signalling arenas.

First he refused to acknowledge the achievement of American veterans players, including the venerable John McEnroe, in reaching Wimbledon Seniors semi-finals and indeed finals. On the charge of ageism therefore I find Andrew Murray Guilty.

Second he refused to acknowledge the magnificent achievement of America's Bryan brothers in winning the Wimbledon doubles tournaments on a number of occasions recently. Therefore on the charge of quantityism I find Andrew Murray Guilty.

Not looking so good now, is he?

Wednesday, 12 July 2017

Trump's call to arms against the enemy within

I didn't comment on Trump's amazing Warsaw speech until I checked out the reaction of the Usual Suspects whose hysterical pearl-clutching confirmed its significance. And so much was significant. First the location in Poland and the frequent references to that country's glorious Christian history. You must understand that Poland is arguably the most anti-Semitic (read: Jew-aware) country in the world. “As the Polish experience reminds us, the defence of the west ultimately rests not only on means but also on the will of its people to prevail” Now that hurt. What a hater. (And by the way he didn't get around to visiting the Holocau$t™ Memorial due to 'scheduling difficulties'. Right.)

Then he rubbed salt in the wound. “Americans, Poles, and the nations of Europe value individual freedom and sovereignty. We must work together to counter forces, whether they come from inside or out, ... that threaten over time to undermine these values and to erase the bonds of culture, faith and tradition that make us who we are. Do we have enough respect for our citizens to protect our borders? Do we have the desire and the courage to preserve our civilization in the face of those who would subvert and destroy it?”

Oh dear. 

But it gets even better. "We write symphonies. We pursue innovation. We celebrate our ancient heroes, embrace our timeless traditions and customs, and always seek to explore and discover brand-new frontiers. We reward brilliance. We strive for excellence, and cherish inspiring works of art that honor God. We treasure the rule of law and protect the right to free speech and free expression. We put faith and family, not government and bureaucracy, at the center of our lives. And we debate everything. We challenge everything. Our own fight for the West does not begin on the battlefield. It begins with our minds, our wills and our souls. We can have the largest economies and the most lethal weapons anywhere on Earth, but if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive."

Gentle reader, this was a call to arms against the enemy within. And the enemy within recognised it as such. Immediately. The reaction ranged from head-shaking disappointment to outright hysteria. For instance one snowflake at the (((Daily Kos))) referred to "fourteen words from-Trump's speech that are truly terrifying". I'm serious. Here's the link. And the fourteen words? "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children." Now I recognise that these words have been associated with White patriots supremacists. (Shudder). But why should anyone object to them? Why should we not secure the existence of our people and a future for white children? Why the fuck should we grovel and apologise for that? Substitute blacks, Jews or any of the mud people and the sentiments would be loudly acclaimed from the mountain tops.

Listen, Trump gets it. Trump knows. He has indeed given us reason to doubt him up to now. But remember this. On all sides enemies surround him. And I'm sure he's been shown the Zapruder film. In fact his only power lies in the mandate from the people and his ability to directly communicate with them. That is why we, especially Americans, must offer him our wholehearted continued support.

Saturday, 8 July 2017

Feminism fails. And it's men's fault

A new study by Yale University has discovered that a "dearth of marriagable men has left an oversupply of 'amazing, attractive intelligent women' taking desperate steps to preserve their fertility. The first global study into egg freezing found that shortages of eligible men were the prime reason why women had attempted to take matters into their own hands. "Terrifying” (sic) demographic shifts had created a “deficit” of educated men and a growing problem of “leftover” professional women, with female graduates vastly outnumbering males in in many countries."

And as ever, men are to blame. Apparently we men 'feel threatened by their success and so are unwilling to commit to starting a family together'. It's more that men are not attracted to 'successful' women in their late thirties, preferring a girl who will put his family ahead of her career, someone young, good-looking and loyal. No man, not even a a house-broken mangina, wants to come home to some ball-breaking work-focused jargon-spouting feminist. He doesn't want to compete with his wife. Especially a wife who's spent the best part of twenty years riding the cock carousel and whose 'success' is based on her 'Masters' in Gender Studies and a six-figure government 
Diversity Manager job.

But I can understand the dilemma of the exemplar in the Yale survey. Having focused on career at the expense of settling down she's now horrified at the speed with which her child-bearing years are disappearing, while all those disposable 'good men' whom she confidently put to one side at an earlier time are no longer available. They're married and/or interested only in girls a lot younger than she. The liberated kind of girl who dispenses sexual favours with reckless she herself once did. And that career isn't all glamour. Today record numbers of women live alone, childless, on psychiatric medication, facing a life-time of wage slavery in grinding jobs that they can never leave. And now as her eggs atrophy the terrible realisation dawns that she's in a kind of Darwinian cul-de-sac with her cats as a surrogate family.

It's tempting to feel a small tinge of schadenfreude at the fate of such women. But they're also victims. Victims of feminism, the single most evil and destructive movement ever to beset the White race. It utterly corrupts girls, turning them from fresh-faced feminine young women into masculinised harpies. It subverts every value and tradition underpinning the greatest civilisation the world has ever seen. It neither kills outright nor inflicts apparent physical harm, yet the extent of its destructive toll is already greater than that of any war, plague, famine, or natural calamity on record. Its potential damage to the quality of human life and the fabric of civilised society is beyond calculation.

But it's hard to awaken women (generally weak-minded conformists) to this reality given the full spectrum control wielded by the (((nation wreckers))) and their goy quislings. They've drunk so deeply of the feminist Kool-Aid that any change in their diet would probably kill them. But changing men's attitudes just might force that awakening. Because increasingly men are disengaging from formal commitment. Men Go Their Own Way (MGTOW). Why get married and risk impoverishment through divorce rape? Why have children when in the event of a break-up they'll be taken from you while you get stuck with the bill for their upkeep? Certainly not for non-committal sex which, ironically thanks to feminism and the societal rot it engendered, is freely available to any man looking for it. 

What we see here is the bitter harvest of feminism. And for women the fruits will be bitterest of all. Yet if you distill that survey and the related MSM analysis it emerges that the solution is actually more feminism. Well if that's what you feel then go for it ladies. You're culling our race of its decadent stock and as such, and this will really horrify you, you're doing the Lord's work.

Monday, 3 July 2017

'Diversity is (((our))) greatest strength'

All of us on this blog are in no doubt as to the origins and purpose of the 'diversity is strength' meme. It's part and parcel of the globalist agenda to atomise, mongrelise and weaken White society, especially straight White men. It's been spectacularly successful, to the point where its purported merits are now being beyond question. This is astonishing because it's hard to imagine a more difficult proposition to sell than diversity.

Diversity means forcing incompatible people to mix with one another, means the best persons doesn't get the job or college place, requires a panoply of laws and regulations with an army of bureaucrats to enforce them, which in turn leads to endless costly and disruptive disputes, court cases and appeals. Meanwhile billions get spent training people to appreciate that which is supposed to be self-evidently wonderful.

A look at diversity in practice should be enough for it to be rejected out of hand. Just up the road from me Catholics and Protestants have been going at it for centuries. Inter-communal violence always breaks out wherever and whenever Muslims reach sufficient numbers in a 'community'. Tutsis and Hutus, Chinese and Tibetans, Turks and Armenians, blacks and Whites, blacks and Hispanics, Jews and gentiles and so on ad infinitum serve to bear out the Chateau Heartise aphorism 'Diversity + Proximity = War'. 

Even university professors have been forced to swallow their prejudice and concede ground on the issue. Robert Puttnam concedes that "in racially and ethnically mixed communities, not only do people not trust strangers, they do not even trust their own kind. They withdraw into themselves, they support community activity less, they vote less. People living in ethnically diverse settings appear to 'hunker down,' that is, to pull in like a turtle, They tend to "withdraw even from close friends, to expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, to register to vote less, to agitate for social reform more but have less faith they can actually make a difference, and to huddle unhappily in front of the television."

After conducting several research projects in the business environment MIT Professor Thomas A. Kochan declared the diversity industry to be "a racket built on foundations of sand.”

Consider it another way. What would the USA have been like without the joys of diversity? For a start there'd have been no Civil War, none of the race riots that beset the country to this day, no KKK, no black ghettos or White flight, the staggering cost in terms of money and effort expended trying to 'bridge the (unbridgeable) achievement gap' would have been saved, welfare and law enforcement costs would be a fraction of what they are now, while American math students would not be languishing in the low thirties of the PISA international rankings. Which incidentally are dominated by diversity-free countries such as Japan, Iceland, Finland and Korea.

But the mantra never ends -  'diversity is our greatest strength'. Or more accurately, 'diversity is (((our))) greatest strength'. (Hat-tip Shaunantijihad)

Tuesday, 27 June 2017

Burning Down the House

It was late 1943 and Churchill was pissed off. The Yanks had nixed his pet project Operation Thunderclap, the one that aimed to kill 275,000 Berliners in one single 2,000-plane raid. As a consolation he asked Roosevelt for a supply of anthrax bombs that would be used to wipe out the population of Germany's six biggest cities. Again Roosevelt demurred. But he offered a glittering alternative: The Dugway villages.

Excerpt: Dugway was a high-security testing facility for chemical and biological weapons. The purpose of the replicas of German homes, which were repeatedly rebuilt after being intentionally burned down, was to perfect tactics in the fire bombing of German residential areas. In order to build a facility that was an authentic reproduction, studies were conducted to determine which materials and furnishings available in the U.S would closely match those in use in Germany. A group of German-American architects including prominent Jewish architects Eric Mendelsohn and Konrad Wachsmann, were employed to design the facility. To ensure that the fires spread as realistically as possible, typical German home-interiors were included, and the wood was periodically doused to simulate conditions in the more humid German climate.

Churchill was delighted as was his Chief Scientific Adviser Frederick Lindemann. A German Jew described by Anthony Eden as 'bad, and quite possibly mad' his main purpose in life according to a colleague was 'to destroy every building in Germany, ideally burying his erstwhile fellow citizens under the rubble'. Lindeman insisted that "the bombing must be directed essentially against working-class houses. Middle-class houses have too much space around them, and so are bound to waste bombs."  Nice chap.

According to the official document no effort was spared. The "German" architects used their knowledge of their former country to design the buildings and contents in such detail that even children's toys were included.  The houses had to be built, burnt, built and burnt, again and again. Oy vey, the frustration! But it was vital that kids not escape lest they grow up to be Nazis. At last the happy day arrived and the go-ahead was given to drop the bombs on the by now virtually undefended cities. The net result was that within a year more than 40% of German housing stock had been destroyed and up to half a million defenceless men, women and children slaughtered.

Can you just imagine going to work in that facility? You asked yourself practical questions like 'how do we get the fire to spread spread quickly enough so that a mother doesn't have time to reach her baby in the cot?' Can such people be truly human or were they some form of demon from another universe? Either way they all went on to enjoy fame and fortune. And why not, were they not the Good Guys? Meanwhile the Bad Guys such as Julius Streicher was hanged after the war, essentially for saying nasty things about the Jews.

And people still say the truth always comes out....

Related post.

Sunday, 25 June 2017

A question for our British readers

Maybe some British readers could enlighten (whoops!) me on on an issue related to the recent fire tragedy (now now!) in Kensington, London. A very expensive part of London. A part of the city out of reach to ordinary Londoners, even those with very good jobs. Do such Brits wonder (discreetly wonder, given the constraints of Nice Thought) where they went wrong? Why they struggle to pay for a shoe-box house in some far-flung suburb while their taxes go to providing apartments in prime locations to people like those pictured here?

Do they see them and their various 'community organisers' as the human equivalent of mosquitoes, always buzzing in your ear while trying to suck your blood? Do they not reflect that Khaled The Camel Humper's swarms of children are unlikely to grow up to be cancer researchers; that they are in fact more likely to end up murdering cancer researchers. And as the parasites' demands multiply do they mutter under their breath 'well then find yourselves a nice brown country to fuck off to'.  Maybe they reflect on Larry Auster’s First Law of Majority-Minority Relations in Liberal Society, which states: “The more troublesome, unassimilable, or dangerous a designated minority or non-Western group actually is, the more favourably it is treated.”

Enquiring minds want to know. So Brits, over to you, enlighten us.

Thursday, 22 June 2017

A suggestion for the Rabbi

Frank Galton, avid commentator on this blog and dedicated researcher has come up with an example of the breathtaking hypocrisy and duplicity that surround Jewish attitudes to refugees and asylum seekers. Britain's Chief Rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, and his wife Valerie, marked the opening of Refugee Week with a visit to a groundbreaking World Jewish Relief project in Yorkshire. One of the refugees thanked the Chief Rabbi for listening to the group’s stories and expressed appreciation for everything the Jewish community was doing to support them.

The Chief Rabbi said: “It is humbling to listen to the remarkable positivity of people who have endured such enormous upheaval, and yet refuse to allow this to define their future. I am tremendously proud of the generosity of our community, which is helping the refugees to meet their needs so impressively. The response of World Jewish Relief to the refugee crisis, a major challenge of our time, both far from our borders...and now in the UK, has been exemplary.”

I've done a bit of research myself on the Chief Rabbi and find that this is pretty much par for the course. He's big on open borders, freedom of movement, the joys and benefits of diversity, welcoming refugees irrespective of their numbers and origins, tolerance, multiculturalism, anti-racism and all that good stuff. And given that he's also a passionate supporter of Israel you'd imagine that country would embody everything that he espouses for White countries.

Well no, actually. As Frank points out, Israel.....

+ Accepts only Jews as immigrants (to the point of enforcing DNA testing)

+ Bans mixed marriages

+ Has separate schools, separate housing, separate roads and separate buses for Jews and Palestinians.

+ Has built a 30-kilometer fence along the border with Jordan to keep migrants and asylum seekers ("wild beasts") from entering Israel

+ Imprisons then deports African asylum seekers

+ Administered the birth control drug Depo Provera to Ethiopian Jews without their knowledge or consent

+ Prohibits Ethiopian Jews from donating blood

+ Bans gay marriage.

So Rabbi here's a suggestion. If you're really interested in the welfare of refugees (and not just in destroying the ethnic homogeneity of White countries) focus your attention on the country that's your real home.

PS, here's where Jewish organisation stand on immigration and refugees. This Ribbi doesn't stand alone.

Sunday, 18 June 2017

Some questions for those 'moderate' Muslims

We hear it after every atrocity - the vast majority of Muslims are peaceable and pose no threat. Well if you have a hornets' nest in your garden rest assured that the vast majority won't bother you. Although you might end up stung to death by the few that do. In any event I don't buy this moderate Muslim meme at all. Quite simply, if you're moderate you can't be a Muslim and if you're a Muslim you can't be moderate. 

This premise is easily validated by the following simple questions.

Was it ok for the 'perfect man' Mohammed to have sexual relations with a nine year-old child?

Was it ok for him to massacre thousands of prisoners?

Do you support the Koran when it says adulterers must be killed?

Do you support the Koran when it says apostates must be killed?

If he answers 'no' to any of these questions he isn't a Muslim. If he answers 'yes' then he is indeed a Muslim and should have no place - apart from a jail cell - in any Western country.

Thursday, 15 June 2017

Meet the New London Bobby

If you read the second last post you'll know about Roy Larner, the supporter of the 'racist' Millwall football club. He, alone and unarmed, fought back against the three jihadis stabbing their way along that bridge in London while the rest of the public fled for their lives. And now we learn that leading the stampede were none other than the local guardians of the peace, wide-eyed with terror as they sprinted away from the crime scene, leaving Roy to fend for himself. 

A chef from the nearby Fish restaurant said: “I saw two guys with big knives downstairs outside Roast. They were stabbing people. The police were running away, they were community police. They were normal officers, they were running away. “The guy with the knife was killing two people. We were shouting ‘stop, stop’ and people threw chairs at them. Police came and shot straight away.”

Despite the reputation of the British Bobby for firm, brave and impartial administration of justice this development should not come as a surprise. Because today's police force - sorry, police 'service' - bears little resemblance to its traditional form.  The policeman of yore was male, straight, White, Protestant and drawn from respectable lower middle-class yeoman stock. The exemplars of today's force service could hardly be more different, predominantly gay, female, transgender, black, brown, Muslim or Sikh. Sexual degenerates and Third World bottom feeders who've never known anything but corrupt totalitarian rule. It's a ghastly stew of  incompetence, ethnic/religious nepotism and corruption with little empathy for ordinary British people. 

And they also chickened out because they know that career advancement lies in capitalising on being female, transgender, black or Muslim - ideally some combination of the foregoing - and above all in enthusiastically clamping down on any sign of British nationalism. There are no brownie (whoops!) points in putting your life on the line for the British public.

Yes indeed, Britain's traitors have done their work well.

Monday, 12 June 2017

Why don't Whites oppose their displacement?

It's a logical follow-on to the previous post to ask why Whites are not in fact fighting back against their dispossession. Far from taking up arms to drive out the invaders and execute the traitors Whites don't even take the risk-free alternative of the secret ballot.

The fundamental cause of White (especially White male) passivity is down to the endless cradle-to-grave multi-faceted propaganda directed against everything White, straight, Christian and masculine. No need to elaborate on this other than to suggest that this may be powerful enough to actually alter the target's brain chemistry, in effect making White males different people to what they would have been. It also forces them to ask the question 'why should we fight if we're so bad?'

Trends towards smaller families, ever easier divorce, weaker ties due to a rootless itinerant globalist lifestyle and targeting White neighbourhoods/regions for enrichment all undermine White social cohesion and trust, and hence the possibility of organised revolt.

Women, especially younger White women, are highly xenophilic. They're the ones usually holding the REFUGEES WELCOME signs and poll after poll shows them voting for open borders and against 'right wing' candidates. Obviously virtue-signalling is an important motivator with vacuous young women but there's also an evolutionary psychology dimension. "For foreign conquest and alien rule, the evolutionary psychological perspective suggests that women should fear alien rule much less than men, but only so long as they are reproductive, because they then have a good chance of being spared by the conquerors and have the option of marrying into them. Accordingly, the analyses of the Eurobarometer data show that young women are much less xenophobic than young men, but the sex differences disappear around age

Male testosterone levels are plummeting, and rebel leaders will always be high T. Maybe that's why we don't have any. And all revolutions need leaders.

On a more prosaic level we have to understand the potential down-side for any straight White male stepping outside the PC reservation. An indiscreet word is enough to get him charged for “hate speech”. At a minimum this means heavy legal fees, probably a fine or even a jail sentence and loss of his job. With a criminal record his alternative employment prospects are dim. His family will also be dragged in to public odium.  He also knows that the police, judicial system and military contain a rapidly decreasing ratio of straight White men like him. He'll realise that blacks, Muslims, queers and Jews in those positions will be willing to pull  the trigger, both literally and metaphorically.

Finally there's the issue of priorities. We see in poll after poll, and we know it from our own personal experience, that White people are opposed to the ongoing mudslide engulfing their countries. Yet they continually vote in political parties that clearly have no intention of stopping it. Despite the facts I outlined above it seems clear to me that Whites just don't see this issue as their top problem. Their primary drivers seem to be economic in the broadest sense. Employment, taxes, inflation etc.

Which leads me back to a contention I've been making for many years. Namely that Whites will not rebel in the absence of a catastrophic economic melt-down. And here I'm not referring to the likes of 2008, rather to that of the thirties or even worse. The irony is that by allowing invaders from the Third World swamp our countries we will become more like the Third World with every day that passes. The defining characteristic of the Third World is poverty. And that's the level of poverty that will finally drive Whites to rebel. Problem is by that time in many cases they'll be strangers in their own lands, their time passed....

Wednesday, 7 June 2017

"We'll fight them on the beaches! We'll fight them on the...... Actually we won't"

There's been some change since 1940 when Churchill uttered these famous words. And there's no doubt that had the Germans tried to occupy Britain the Brits would have defended their homeland with dogged determination. (The irony of course is that Hitler had no interest in occupying Britain with which he was anxiously seeking peace. But Churchill had fallen under the control of the (((international financiers))). And they wanted Germany destroyed utterly. So the slaughter went on until that objective was achieved.)

But now we have this. London's Metropolitan Police enjoining Londoners to run, hide and tell if they encounter a modern-day invader. Thus we measure the decline of Britain and what's become of the once indomitable British bulldog spirit.

But perhaps we shouldn't be too surprised. Because the Londoners who braved the Blitz were a different people to those now being instructed to run and hide in the face of their adversaries.  In fact White British (i.e. British) are now a minority in their own capital which is ruled over by a dusky Muslim coolie from the cruel impoverished and backward wilds of Pakistan. In fact it was hardly necessary for the Met to issue their guidance as fleeing and hiding is what today's 'Brits' have been doing anyway.

Apart from Roy Larner. A True Brit, alone he stood his ground and fought back despite being unarmed, getting seriously injured in the process. Interesting that his battle cry was 'Fuck you, I'm Millwall'. You see Millwall is the most despised football club in Britain. Why? Because they're supported by White racist low-life yobs. We are GoodWhites if we hate and despise them.

Roy Larner shows that the spirit that ruled an empire on which the sun never set still lives on, albeit ridiculed and marginalised by moral eunuchs not worthy to tie his bootlaces.

Sunday, 4 June 2017

Trump's finest hour

The most important thing to know about global warming - whoops, I mean climate change - is that it's a racket from start to finish. That's the aspect to focus on if you're trying to justify Trump's glorious decision to give the Paris meeting a large middle finger. The 'science' purporting to support the anthropomorphic link has degenerated into a fraudulent and intolerant religious cultism while the experts' have ricocheted from forecasting an imminent ice age forty years ago to telling us the polar ice cap would have melted by now. Most important of all it's a giant fraud to extract $100 billion a year from White taxpayers and transfer it to crooks in the Third World. Carbon trading is so open to corruption it's as if the system were designed by crooks. Oh wait - it was!

In any event the whole narrative is laughably inconsistent. For instance with all the new-found wealth Third World peasants will become major polluters like their Western counterparts. Solar and wind power generators survive only by way of vast government (i.e. White taxpayer) supports, will never provide enough power for a modern society while their production and maintenance cycles are environmentally damaging. Clamouring shitlib eco-freaks transport food from all over the world, clock up millions of air miles attending climate change conferences (rather than use teleconferencing facilities) and oppose Third World population control as imperialistic.

And of course the climate change project ticks every single globalist button. No wonder we only ever get one side of the argument.

If you're still in doubt just consider those who have objected most strongly to Trump's withdrawal:

The UN
The EU
(((The MSM)))
(((International financiers)))
Obama and Hillary Rodent Clinton

It's a veritable rogues gallery.

So well done Donald. You have struck a serious blow against the globo-homo NWO.