Thursday, 22 June 2017

A suggestion for the Rabbi

Frank Galton, avid commentator on this blog and dedicated researcher has come up with an example of the breathtaking hypocrisy and duplicity that surround Jewish attitudes to refugees and asylum seekers. Britain's Chief Rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, and his wife Valerie, marked the opening of Refugee Week with a visit to a groundbreaking World Jewish Relief project in Yorkshire. One of the refugees thanked the Chief Rabbi for listening to the group’s stories and expressed appreciation for everything the Jewish community was doing to support them.

The Chief Rabbi said: “It is humbling to listen to the remarkable positivity of people who have endured such enormous upheaval, and yet refuse to allow this to define their future. I am tremendously proud of the generosity of our community, which is helping the refugees to meet their needs so impressively. The response of World Jewish Relief to the refugee crisis, a major challenge of our time, both far from our borders...and now in the UK, has been exemplary.”

I've done a bit of research myself on the Chief Rabbi and find that this is pretty much par for the course. He's big on open borders, freedom of movement, the joys and benefits of diversity, welcoming refugees irrespective of their numbers and origins, tolerance, multiculturalism, anti-racism and all that good stuff. And given that he's also a passionate supporter of Israel you'd imagine that country would embody everything that he espouses for White countries.

Well no, actually. As Frank points out, Israel.....

+ Accepts only Jews as immigrants (to the point of enforcing DNA testing)

+ Bans mixed marriages

+ Has separate schools, separate housing, separate roads and separate buses for Jews and Palestinians.

+ Has built a 30-kilometer fence along the border with Jordan to keep migrants and asylum seekers ("wild beasts") from entering Israel

+ Imprisons then deports African asylum seekers

+ Administered the birth control drug Depo Provera to Ethiopian Jews without their knowledge or consent

+ Prohibits Ethiopian Jews from donating blood

+ Bans gay marriage.

So Rabbi here's a suggestion. If you're really interested in the welfare of refugees (and not just in destroying the ethnic homogeneity of White countries) focus your attention on the country that's your real home.

PS, here's where Jewish organisation stand on immigration and refugees. This Ribbi doesn't stand alone.

Sunday, 18 June 2017

Some questions for those 'moderate' Muslims

We hear it after every atrocity - the vast majority of Muslims are peaceable and pose no threat. Well if you have a hornets' nest in your garden rest assured that the vast majority won't bother you. Although you might end up stung to death by the few that do. In any event I don't buy this moderate Muslim meme at all. Quite simply, if you're moderate you can't be a Muslim and if you're a Muslim you can't be moderate. 

This premise is easily validated by the following simple questions.

Was it ok for the 'perfect man' Mohammed to have sexual relations with a nine year-old child?

Was it ok for him to massacre thousands of prisoners?

Do you support the Koran when it says adulterers must be killed?

Do you support the Koran when it says apostates must be killed?

If he answers 'no' to any of these questions he isn't a Muslim. If he answers 'yes' then he is indeed a Muslim and should have no place - apart from a jail cell - in any Western country.

Thursday, 15 June 2017

Meet the New London Bobby

If you read the second last post you'll know about Roy Larner, the supporter of the 'racist' Millwall football club. He, alone and unarmed, fought back against the three jihadis stabbing their way along that bridge in London while the rest of the public fled for their lives. And now we learn that leading the stampede were none other than the local guardians of the peace, wide-eyed with terror as they sprinted away from the crime scene, leaving Roy to fend for himself. 

A chef from the nearby Fish restaurant said: “I saw two guys with big knives downstairs outside Roast. They were stabbing people. The police were running away, they were community police. They were normal officers, they were running away. “The guy with the knife was killing two people. We were shouting ‘stop, stop’ and people threw chairs at them. Police came and shot straight away.”

Despite the reputation of the British Bobby for firm, brave and impartial administration of justice this development should not come as a surprise. Because today's police force - sorry, police 'service' - bears little resemblance to its traditional form.  The policeman of yore was male, straight, White, Protestant and drawn from respectable lower middle-class yeoman stock. The exemplars of today's force service could hardly be more different, predominantly gay, female, transgender, black, brown, Muslim or Sikh. Sexual degenerates and Third World bottom feeders who've never known anything but corrupt totalitarian rule. It's a ghastly stew of  incompetence, ethnic/religious nepotism and corruption with little empathy for ordinary British people. 

And they also chickened out because they know that career advancement lies in capitalising on being female, transgender, black or Muslim - ideally some combination of the foregoing - and above all in enthusiastically clamping down on any sign of British nationalism. There are no brownie (whoops!) points in putting your life on the line for the British public.

Yes indeed, Britain's traitors have done their work well.

Monday, 12 June 2017

Why don't Whites oppose their displacement?

It's a logical follow-on to the previous post to ask why Whites are not in fact fighting back against their dispossession. Far from taking up arms to drive out the invaders and execute the traitors Whites don't even take the risk-free alternative of the secret ballot.

The fundamental cause of White (especially White male) passivity is down to the endless cradle-to-grave multi-faceted propaganda directed against everything White, straight, Christian and masculine. No need to elaborate on this other than to suggest that this may be powerful enough to actually alter the target's brain chemistry, in effect making White males different people to what they would have been. It also forces them to ask the question 'why should we fight if we're so bad?'

Trends towards smaller families, ever easier divorce, weaker ties due to a rootless itinerant globalist lifestyle and targeting White neighbourhoods/regions for enrichment all undermine White social cohesion and trust, and hence the possibility of organised revolt.

Women, especially younger White women, are highly xenophilic. They're the ones usually holding the REFUGEES WELCOME signs and poll after poll shows them voting for open borders and against 'right wing' candidates. Obviously virtue-signalling is an important motivator with vacuous young women but there's also an evolutionary psychology dimension. "For foreign conquest and alien rule, the evolutionary psychological perspective suggests that women should fear alien rule much less than men, but only so long as they are reproductive, because they then have a good chance of being spared by the conquerors and have the option of marrying into them. Accordingly, the analyses of the Eurobarometer data show that young women are much less xenophobic than young men, but the sex differences disappear around age

Male testosterone levels are plummeting, and rebel leaders will always be high T. Maybe that's why we don't have any. And all revolutions need leaders.

On a more prosaic level we have to understand the potential down-side for any straight White male stepping outside the PC reservation. An indiscreet word is enough to get him charged for “hate speech”. At a minimum this means heavy legal fees, probably a fine or even a jail sentence and loss of his job. With a criminal record his alternative employment prospects are dim. His family will also be dragged in to public odium.  He also knows that the police, judicial system and military contain a rapidly decreasing ratio of straight White men like him. He'll realise that blacks, Muslims, queers and Jews in those positions will be willing to pull  the trigger, both literally and metaphorically.

Finally there's the issue of priorities. We see in poll after poll, and we know it from our own personal experience, that White people are opposed to the ongoing mudslide engulfing their countries. Yet they continually vote in political parties that clearly have no intention of stopping it. Despite the facts I outlined above it seems clear to me that Whites just don't see this issue as their top problem. Their primary drivers seem to be economic in the broadest sense. Employment, taxes, inflation etc.

Which leads me back to a contention I've been making for many years. Namely that Whites will not rebel in the absence of a catastrophic economic melt-down. And here I'm not referring to the likes of 2008, rather to that of the thirties or even worse. The irony is that by allowing invaders from the Third World swamp our countries we will become more like the Third World with every day that passes. The defining characteristic of the Third World is poverty. And that's the level of poverty that will finally drive Whites to rebel. Problem is by that time in many cases they'll be strangers in their own lands, their time passed....

Wednesday, 7 June 2017

"We'll fight them on the beaches! We'll fight them on the...... Actually we won't"

There's been some change since 1940 when Churchill uttered these famous words. And there's no doubt that had the Germans tried to occupy Britain the Brits would have defended their homeland with dogged determination. (The irony of course is that Hitler had no interest in occupying Britain with which he was anxiously seeking peace. But Churchill had fallen under the control of the (((international financiers))). And they wanted Germany destroyed utterly. So the slaughter went on until that objective was achieved.)

But now we have this. London's Metropolitan Police enjoining Londoners to run, hide and tell if they encounter a modern-day invader. Thus we measure the decline of Britain and what's become of the once indomitable British bulldog spirit.

But perhaps we shouldn't be too surprised. Because the Londoners who braved the Blitz were a different people to those now being instructed to run and hide in the face of their adversaries.  In fact White British (i.e. British) are now a minority in their own capital which is ruled over by a dusky Muslim coolie from the cruel impoverished and backward wilds of Pakistan. In fact it was hardly necessary for the Met to issue their guidance as fleeing and hiding is what today's 'Brits' have been doing anyway.

Apart from Roy Larner. A True Brit, alone he stood his ground and fought back despite being unarmed, getting seriously injured in the process. Interesting that his battle cry was 'Fuck you, I'm Millwall'. You see Millwall is the most despised football club in Britain. Why? Because they're supported by White racist low-life yobs. We are GoodWhites if we hate and despise them.

Roy Larner shows that the spirit that ruled an empire on which the sun never set still lives on, albeit ridiculed and marginalised by moral eunuchs not worthy to tie his bootlaces.

Sunday, 4 June 2017

Trump's finest hour

The most important thing to know about global warming - whoops, I mean climate change - is that it's a racket from start to finish. That's the aspect to focus on if you're trying to justify Trump's glorious decision to give the Paris meeting a large middle finger. The 'science' purporting to support the anthropomorphic link has degenerated into a fraudulent and intolerant religious cultism while the experts' have ricocheted from forecasting an imminent ice age forty years ago to telling us the polar ice cap would have melted by now. Most important of all it's a giant fraud to extract $100 billion a year from White taxpayers and transfer it to crooks in the Third World. Carbon trading is so open to corruption it's as if the system were designed by crooks. Oh wait - it was!

In any event the whole narrative is laughably inconsistent. For instance with all the new-found wealth Third World peasants will become major polluters like their Western counterparts. Solar and wind power generators survive only by way of vast government (i.e. White taxpayer) supports, will never provide enough power for a modern society while their production and maintenance cycles are environmentally damaging. Clamouring shitlib eco-freaks transport food from all over the world, clock up millions of air miles attending climate change conferences (rather than use teleconferencing facilities) and oppose Third World population control as imperialistic.

And of course the climate change project ticks every single globalist button. No wonder we only ever get one side of the argument.

If you're still in doubt just consider those who have objected most strongly to Trump's withdrawal:

The UN
The EU
(((The MSM)))
(((International financiers)))
Obama and Hillary Rodent Clinton

It's a veritable rogues gallery.

So well done Donald. You have struck a serious blow against the globo-homo NWO.

Thursday, 1 June 2017

Not with a bang but a whimper

I have (with the exception of sport, and I'm working on that) long ago given up watching TV.  It was surprisingly easy. But due to family circumstances I had to endure severe doses of it for most of last week. The scale, depth and overall pervasiveness of the indoctrination was breathtaking. It starts with infants. The cartoon characters are close to 50% non-White, blacks and browns are portrayed as clever and well-spoken leaders, families invariably mixed-race, often featuring same-sex 'parents', androgyny is everywhere with everything dumbed-down to the lowest degree. The aphorism 'give me the child and I'll give you the adult' - variously attributed to Lenin and the Jesuits - never seemed more valid. On Sky News the two coal black presenters (one male, one female of course) were at one stage joined by the network's Chief Political Correspondent...... one Feisal Islam.

There followed a panel discussion on what it means to be British. Panel was wall-to-wall black and brown with a few carefully-selected  British eunuchs thrown in for ballast. The general consensus was that they all felt British. But would prefer if being British was less associated with being White! The limp-wristed moderator clucked in sympathy. And that's the way it's going. The resultant stew will have no common sense of history, culture, race or religion....the things that made them British. (The same syndrome applies all over western Europe, from Ireland to Greece, from Finland to Portugal). In such circumstances the nation eventually becomes fractious and atomised. Sedated and stupefied by bread and circuses an enormous cohort of welfare parasites will  continue to elect politicians that actively work to destroy their nation-states and enmesh them ever deeper into the international globo-homo power structures. 

But surely the White middle and working class males will not just sit back while they get dispossessed of everything their ancestors left them? Well that's where my excerpt from T S Elliot's Hollow Man comes in. I think they'll do just that. Despite Brexit and the inescapable signs of a White awakening I fear this is the way their world ends, not with a bang but a whimper. Already street-by-street vast swathes of their towns and cities have succumbed to the toxic black/brown sludge. And Whites retreat. Again and again. How long can this go on? Well, long enough for it to become an irreversible reality.

Before that happens the real nature of multiculturalism will of course have become clear. But this is where the carefully-constructed mind control programme comes in. Because as Orwell foresaw, when you constrain what can be said you eventually constrain what can be thought. My grandson's generation may well end up lying to themselves without knowing that they're doing it. Fyodor Dostoyevsky wrote  Above all, don’t lie to yourself. The man who lies to himself and listens to his own lie comes to a point that he cannot distinguish the truth within him, or around him, and so loses all respect for himself and for others." I became aware of this in the old Communist countries, especially Roumania. The lies and cognitive dissonance were so outrageous it seemed to me the authorities were not trying to convince but to humiliate, to break the people's spirit and will to resist. By forcing them to acquiesce to the lies and to remain silent - or even worse to regurgitate them - rots the moral fibre, rendering them easily controllable and malleable.

Was this what Elliot had in mind when he wrote the final lines of The Hollow Man

In this last of meeting places
We grope together
And avoid speech
Gathered on this beach of the tumid river

Saturday, 27 May 2017

What should South Africa's Whites do? What CAN they do?

A close friend of mine is a regular visitor to South Africa. These are substantial visits, 10-14 days at a time, undertaken about four times a year and taking in the main metropolitan areas. Not having been there for a considerable time myself - and I have no plans to go there! - I've tasked him with keeping a close eye on the economy, infrastructure, societal changes and attitudes among the people. No surprise to learn that things have come to a sorry pass, despite the glowing reports from large sections of the Western media.

So much so that the normally quiescent business community have been driven to take out huge advertisement of the South African Sunday Times newspaper, claiming that the country is 'in crisis' that the state has been 'captured' and its 'natural and financial assets stolen'. It claims that the government is guilty of ‘propaganda, slogans, racism and lies’ to silence criticism. In other words heading towards your typical African failed state. Government bonds were recently downgraded to junk status and, a la Rhodesia, the country has gone from being the breadbasket of the region to importing necessary foodstuffs.

My friend tells me that compared to ten years ago the situation in every arena has deteriorated drastically. Essentially everything has got worse. A lot worse. But one thing is going well. The war against Whites. This takes many forms, from low-level thefts and assaults to mass murder on the country's farms. And hardly a week goes by that doesn't see another piece of legislation enacted with the objective of furthering dispossessing and marginalising Whites. My friend tells me that every visit reveals White professionals and executives replaced by incompetent and corrupt black buffoons. Whole swaths of business activity have been crippled as a result.

Despite this many Whites still hold onto the dream of the Rainbow Nation. But their numbers are falling. Fast. Not surprising when the country's President (seen on the left at a recent Cabinet Meeting) gives vent to that rollicking old ditty 'Kill The Boer, Kill The Farmer', followed up by an impassioned version of 'Bring Me My Machine gun'. Julius Malema, who commands a huge following among the 'youth', openly talks about physically eliminating Whites. In a recent speech he said ‘We are not calling for the slaughter of white people' adding hastily on seeing the dismayed look of his followers 'at least for now.’ And as is common elsewhere, strenuous efforts are being made to separate Whites from their guns. Little wonder that Genocide Watch chief Gregory Stanton, himself a former anti-apartheid activist, has warned that white South African farmers are facing full-blown genocide.

So what are the options for the country's Whites?

Well they could leave, and huge numbers have already done that. But given the collapse of the Rand and the raft of expropriation measures in place almost all will have to accept a major drop in living standards. And bear in mind that their racial kin in Europe have been conditioned to see themselves as having more in common with Indonesian Muslims than with their apartheid-loving cousins from SA.

They could try to form a White homeland within South Africa, as they're already doing with the likes of Orania. There's also vague talk about a major one in the Western Cape. But in a doomsday scenario such a homeland would be overrun by waves of impoverished savages, aided and abetted by the 'international community'.

The third alternative is to establish a doomsday contingency plan, one which enables White to muster and defend themselves. A number of such contingency plans are being prepared, volunteers being trained and survival resources put in place by groups such as the Suidlanders, This organisation, which says it has around 6,000 active members, 12,000 associate members, and 70,000 family members, estimates that some 800,000 people will participate if and when the need arises to put its evacuation plans into effect. The general plan is to escape the cities and head for well-stocked farms in the countryside. There are hundreds of routes planned to get out of South Africa’s cities in the event of crisis, and hundreds of separate destinations depending on where in the country the members are located. The organisation also has a national headquarters, communications systems, refugee coordination, security, and medical preparations in place for if and when they are needed.

Maybe the 'final solution' will incorporate elements of all three. In any event be aware that the situation is dire and gets worse by the day. And lament the tragedy of a First World nation reduced to Third World status by primitives whose claim to the nation arose only from their ability to outbreed its creators.

Tuesday, 23 May 2017

Initial thoughts on the Manchester attack

Desperate attempts will be made to link Russia to the attack.

The main focus will immediately switch to avoiding Islamophobia and not 'stigmatising' Muslims

We'll learn that the attacker was being tracked by the police. Right up to the time he set off the bomb!

Obama, voice quivering with emotion (/s) will claim that 'the victims are in our thoughts and prayers'

The streets will be thronged with Muslims protesting this outrage (/s)

Firm action will be called for: Like having a candle-lit parade in which everyone holds hands, chanting Peace & Love while wearing Please Don't Kill Me bracelets

In conclusion I see that London Mayor Saddiq Khan says that 'terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city'.  Well that might be true from where you come from boy...

And apart from those directly affected, the crime will be largely forgotten within a few days, Muslims will continue to flood in and the police will resume focusing on purveyors of 'hate' speech. But look on the bright side: Think of what the world would be like if Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi hadn't been overthrown

Monday, 22 May 2017

The strange case of David Icke

The Orwellian closing down of unsanctified speech and thought is standard practice today as our overlords work to keep us in The Matrix, comatose and quiescent. In some of our 'liberal democracies' questioning the Narrative in even the most trivial way can land you in jail.  Which makes the case of David Icke all the more remarkable.

Icke doesn't just question the Narrative, he opens up on it with both barrels. He doesn't avoid the Third Rail, he enthusiastically leaps on it.

He writes and speaks on:

()  The globalist NWO agenda, expertly tying it in to the strategic events shaping our world such as mass immigration to White-only lands, cultural degeneracy, the EU, the UN, media control etc.

() The Rothschild/Zionist/globalist/NWO nexus

()  Israel as an illegal state which controls the USA

()  The 9/11 false flag

()  Holocaust Denial (which admittedly he subsequently rowed back on)

()  The Global Warming hoax

There's lots more of an equally offensive nature (Michelle Obama is a tranny) yet he not only survives, he thrives. His books and videos sell by the millions and he regularly speaks to monster packed-out audiences throughout the world. Sure, he gets ridiculed in the MSM and his FB was closed down. But contrast this with what happened to David Irving, Brendan O'Connell, 87 year-old Ursula Haverbeck and others too numerous to mention and the 'disappearing' of legendary author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. Even middle-of-the-road organisations like American Renaissance find it difficult to book a hotel for a conference. Yet he not only survives, he thrives. 

Very strange, is it not?

Thursday, 18 May 2017

Keyboard warriors

Don't know whether you picked up on a mini thread in the previous post on the issue of keyboard warriors. The thesis was to the effect that they had failed to prove their worth and should now join the street fighters. Now cracking enemy skulls is a worthy and noble exercise but in itself will not suffice. If we are to get our countries back we must first awaken Whites as to what's being done to them, by whom and why. In the absence of this we can whack libtards to our hearts' content but to little avail.

A reaction by an unenlightened minority can be easily controlled, misdirected and ultimately nullified. The media and police will come down like a ton of bricks. Maybe a few short-term scraps will be thrown but normal nation-wrecking business will soon resume. In any event such street action will be directed against the symptom (immigrants) while ignoring the real culprits. You don't succeed that way.

As Samuel Adams observed “It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”. And that's where the keyboard warriors come in. Remember most revolutions of the 20th century are said to have started in coffee shops. The Internet today is the equivalent of these coffee shops. Blogs, comments on social media and MSM outlets (where permitted) if voluminous enough and on message can generate this critical mass. Remember the system survives only because White men permit it to stand. They permit it to stand only because they fail to appreciate the nature and scale of the war being waged on them.

That's where the keyboard warriors come in. And once we do reach that critical mass skull-cracking cn begin in earnest.

Monday, 15 May 2017

Diversity Wars

For many years now I've stopped going to the cinema and virtually given up watching TV (apart from sport). Occasionally Lady Savant tries to talk me into watching something but I almost invariably switch off after a few minutes. Such was the case with the Sky TV production Fortitude, a drama set in the Arctic Circle. "I'll give it a go. But if there's a brilliant black scientist with an adoring White wife I'm outta here." Took all of five minutes for the brilliant black scientist with the adoring White wife to appear.

Just last night she tried it with another Sky production Lucky Man. Within five minutes the White hero/anti-hero had been given a stern talking to by no fewer than three persons of colour about his gambling addiction. His black secretary was straight from Central Casting. You know the type, the put-upon underling who quietly does all the work - but gets none of the credit. Pretty much like that Hollywood staple, the Aunt Jemima character, the one who really raises the White kids while their stupid, vacuous and selfish White mother worries only about her social scene. Jemima roles her eyes at the antics of the mother, exchanging meaningful glances with the neglected children. Same with the secretary in Lucky Man. Just in case the stupid goyim didn't get the message the anti-hero, having been roundly admonished, tells her 'you do realise you're my subordinate, don't you?'.

The London Independent tells us that such productions are the 'brainchild' of Anne Mensah who it seems was 'poached' from the HebeBC by Sky. "Born to a father from Ghana and a mother from Canada [presumably the 'father' did a runner when the child was about two] Mensah admits that a deficit in ethnic minority representation both on- and off-screen requires radical action. Sky has pledged that, by the end of this year, at least 20 per cent of the stars and writers of its UK-originated TV shows will come from a black, Asian or other minority ethnic background. “It can’t just be about paying lip-service and box-ticking; we have to say, ‘We’re just going to do it’.” The article adds that "Channel 4 has published a “diversity charter” which requires its dramas to feature one lead character from an ethnic minority background or another under-represented group, if the programme fails to meet other “diversity” criteria."

Notice its advocates never bother to explain how diversity - filling your country with the kind of people who build the kind of countries those same people are desperate to escape from - is good, confident that the brainwashed plebs will happily fill in the blanks with their own version of the mantra. They don't want us to be like Japan which has virtually no diversity, and therefore no civil-rights acts, no forced busing, no governmental agencies counting how many of whom one hires, no voting-rights laws, no affirmative action and resulting anger. An employer simply hires the best qualified candidate. And the Japanese do not burn their cities in racial rioting.

Never forget the Diversity Project's real aim: Blend Whites out of existence.

Friday, 12 May 2017

Will the Saxon finally begin to hate?

The BBC will show the first of a three-part series ('Three Girls') on the Rochdale Muslim grooming scandal next Tuesday. The script of the actual Rochdale scandal played out exactly like dozens if not hundreds of others throughout Britain. In heavily Muslim-infested areas local Muslims groom and rape very young White girls. Nobody does anything to stop them. The police in fact threaten to prosecute the girls' families for 'disturbing the peace' while social services studiously ignore the problem for years on end, and as in the Rochdale case, fire employees who try to stop the abuse. The political establishment turns a blind eye.

The BBC (or should that be the HebeBC?) - the people who covered up for Jimmy Saville long after his guilt was known - coyly inform us that Three Girls is 'based on the true stories of victims of grooming and sexual abuse in Rochdale'. Well no, it's not. Except in the very loosest sense. In fact it completely rewrites history to a degree that would have embarrassed Stalin and his propagandists. You see the rapists in the programme are White whereas the real ones (and the same applies all over the country) were Pakistani Muslims. And as the top picture underlines, a more repulsive gang of inbred monsters would be hard to find. Not content with this, one of the main detectives in the programme is a Muslim as is the Prosecuting Counsel.
England's Top Lawman

Now this is not as insane as it sounds as the British Police, Crown Prosecution Services and Child Protection Agencies are riddled at the highest levels with blacks and Muslims.  Nonetheless I think the HebeBC echo chamber might have 'done a Trump' in this instance. Because the story as they tell it is so blatantly at variance with the well known facts, in fact such a grotesque distortion, that the brainwashing must become apparent to even the most comatose viewer. There simply has to be an acceleration, maybe even a rapid one, in the growing distrust of the BBC and MSM outlets in general.

And, if God is good, maybe the Saxon will begin to understand the nature of the terrible crime committed against him, a crime that has seen his country swamped by inferior people, an invasion orchestrated at the highest levels of the globo-homo power structure, aided and abetted by British traitors. Should that happen maybe the Saxon will finally begin to hate..

It was not suddently bred
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.

Monday, 8 May 2017

Libtard logic

It's a cliche by now that liberalism is a mental disease. By liberalism of course I'm not referring to the true meaning of the word, rather to the ghastly simulacrum with which it gets equated today. One of its key characteristics is to virtue signal irrespective of the consequences. Mass immigration to Europe is an example. The snowflakes quiver in horror whenever 'migrants' get rejected. But following this position to its 'logical' conclusion would mean that every African or Arab who shows up here gets accepted. If that were the case then tens if not hundreds of millions would immediately swarm in. Do they accept the utter impracticality of that? Or do they think there must in actual fact be some form of immigration controls? Which in turn of course means some would get rejected. Back to square one.

But 'liberals' don't bother themselves with such abstractions when there's status-whoring to be done.

Some of you may have heard of this black footballer who suffered 'racial abuse' (of the verbal kind of course) in Italy. He was so bothered that he walked off the pitch. Which got him in trouble with both his club and the football authorities. Cue an explosion of snowflake outrage. 'The match should have been abandoned' they quiver. The cry has been taken up by the myriad of anti-racist quangos and 'charities' which infest this arena. So stripped to its essence this would mean that any player from a designated victim group (i.e. anyone other than straight White Christians) can take it upon himself to get a match abandoned. So you're two goals down with ten minutes left when you hear (mind you nobody else heard it) a racial slur directed at you. Off the field you go and the match gets abandoned.

Can you just imagine trying to run a league in such circumstances? But status-whoring always comes first.

A major article on the inexplicable success of the Alt-Right has appeared in The Atlantic. If you're thinking of reading it....don't. Rubbish from start to finish. What I found remarkable about it was the utter inability to 'get' what's going on. You'd have to ask how these morons have managed to acquire and hold so much power. Example: The article claims that many on the Alt-Right are young unemployed or under-employed White men who blame Affirmative Action for their plight. The article expresses astonishment that they could believe this. But that's the whole point about AA. It is all about discrimination. It's about giving preference in job applications, promotions and university admissions to those who are not White, male, straight and of Christian stock. Yet the Atlantic libtards can't see this.

Yet in our society today they hold both the high moral ground and the power. A bit like these guys.

Thursday, 4 May 2017

The pictures that should win Le Pen the Election. But probably won't...

These two pictures of the French national teams from today and the early sixties trace in stark detail the staggering scale of French population displacement over the last fifty years. And it's not just the visuals which underlie this development. As I wrote in an earlier post we should not be surprised at developments in France because it's now clear that the country and its people are effectively lost. A recent study into sickle cell disease (SCD) has revealed (despite attempts to mask the real significance) that for one third of 'French' babies at least one parent is from Africa or the near-East. CDC had been confined to those areas but 'due to Third World immigration it has become the most common genetic disorder in today's France'.

The country is well on the way to becoming a hybrid of Algeria and Senegal and is probably in irreversible decline. I often wonder what French crowds are thinking as they lustily sing La Marseillaise before sporting events while "their" team made up of Africans, Arabs and every other sort of mystery meat stand silently waiting for the match to start?

We might have a better idea after the forthcoming Presidential Election run-off. They can choose between a sick, 
worthless, globalist Rothschild lackey or a woman who claims to prioritise the interests of the French people by withdrawing from the Devil's Compact (EU/Euro) and sharply cutting down on mass immigration. If - as seems almost certain despite Obama's kiss-of-death endorsement - they choose Macron then they're choosing the path to ethnic oblivion. And we're talking about the simple act of voting here, not taking out the guns and pitchforks. If they can't bring themselves to do that then do they deserve to survive as a people?

A final thought - would Le Pen do a Trump if elected, jettisoning her campaign promises without the blink of an eye? She might not have a son-in-law called Kushner but she does have a long term 'partner' who's an Algerian of Jewish descent. And she did dump her father from the party because of his 'anti-Semitism' and opposition to Israeli land-grabbing. In addition she'd face a deeply divided Parliament.

So maybe it doesn't matter as much as we think after all......

Sunday, 30 April 2017

Are Whites to blame for mass Third World immigration?

David Cole is the Jewish guy whose brilliant documentary on Auschwitz and the broader Holocau$t™ hoax screwed up his life. For this he was traduced, fired from his job, denied a university place, beaten up and threatened to the extent that he had to change his name. That man has shown extraordinary courage. How many of us goyim would do that? 

But David also plays a clever game in exonerating Jews generally for the existential crisis facing Whites today. It's our own fault you see. In a recent Takimag article he supports this position by quoting approvingly from "Based Matt Formey", a Chicago-based alt-right blogger.

"Blaming the Jews for white degeneracy is like blaming a robber for cleaning your house out when you left the front door unlocked and open. If you’d locked the door, you wouldn’t have had any problems. Sweden, Iceland and the other Nordic countries have a Jewish population that is close to zero, yet the “master race” managed to ruin themselves with poz, diversity and decay all on their own. Of course the Jews are profiting off your stupidity, white man. It’s what they do. It’s YOUR fault for being stupid. If you blame your problems on the Jews, you are a white nigger."

So here again the plaintive 'how-can-Jews-have-power-when-there-are-so-few-of-us?' plea is presented. The answer of course is "easily". In Sweden's case the mass non-White immigration project was started in the mid-sixties by David Schwartz, a Polish-born Jew and (yet another) Holocau$t™ 'survivor'. He led a group which actively campaigned and propagandised for mass non-White immigration until in 1975 Sweden introduced its own version of America's 1965 Immigration Act, setting the Swedish people on their current path to oblivion. His project was actively supported by the Swedish media which was then - and remains - largely Jewish-controlled. Not just owned as with the Bonniere family but controlled through writers, producers, editors and publishers, as can be seen on this link. [WARNING: Link contains horrifying close-up images of these malevolent gargoyles. Reader discretion advised]

I think David Cole is being uncharachteristically modest in downplaying such an achievement.

But Jews based in Sweden would nonetheless have struggled in the absence of the international White ethnic destruction ecosystem. (This system is analogous to Monomorium santschii's chemical which it deploys to destroy its host.) Feminism, bogus equality theories and the degradation of art and literature served to undermine the White family,our legal system, ethnic solidarity, pride in our achievement and traditional morality while the invention of the Holocau$t™ saturated Whites with a deep-rooted guilt complex towards not only Jews but also other minorities. It was an easy step then to militarise this indoctrination by means of mass Third World immigration of the kind now transforming Sweden and most other Western countries in which Jewish fifth-columns work ceaselessly to further the project.

Ultimately of course it is indeed the responsibility of White countries to prevent their own destruction. If we were not such careless and inattentive virtue-signallers our enemies would be easily defeated. But that does not give Jews a free pass. Fact is, without their machinations we would not be facing this problem at all.

A closing thought. Asking the innocent 'how-can-Jews-have-power-when-there-are-so-few-of-us?' question of course invites a ready response. That of showing the truly vast Jewish over-representation in the financial, political, academic and media arenas. That's one circle which even those legendary word-smiths would find difficult to square.

Thursday, 27 April 2017

Trump's biggest betrayal yet

Most people have now literally lost track of Trump's betrayed election promises. But his appointment of a corrupt Indian coolie (but I repeat myself) to withdraw existing net neutrality (NN) provisions represents probably the worst betrayal yet. The move is not just about more loot for the ISPs, it could - will - have critical implications for White nationalists and the alt-right generally. Because despite what Trump has said, this is not about paying according to the volume of data you access. It's about what you access. 

We all know there's a multi-faceted war being waged against us under the pretext of 'fake news' and 'hate'. Withdrawing NN provides our nation-wrecking globo-homo overlords with a priceless weapon in this war, more powerful than any legislation. Its power lies in the ability to apply discriminatory pricing and 'performance throttling' to offending web sites.  So ISPs, highly dependent on Government good will, can throttle the performance of web sites to the point where readers will just give up using them. They can supplement this attack by charging users more for access to such sites. It's no exaggeration to say that the very existence of the alt-right is threatened. (On a less sinister note they could decide what film channel you can use or at what stores you can electronically shop.) You don't have to be paranoid to realise where this is going. It sets the foundations for a level of internet control far in excess of anything we've known to date. 

But, hey, let's look on the bright side - at least Hillary didn't win. Had she done so America would be bombing Syria and provoking war with Russia, endorsing NATO and NAFTA rather than withdrawing from them, Yellen would be reinstated at the FED, Assange would still be a target, Obamacare would be place for the foreseeable future.

Yeah, think how bad that would be....

Sunday, 23 April 2017

Solutions to the black undertow

Lady Savant posed an interesting question to me last night. She had been watching a documentary featuring 'fearless investigative journalist Ross Kemp as he travels to Memphis, one of the most segregated cities in the US, to find out why so many African-Americans are worse off today than they were 50 years ago'.Well Ross soon discovered the answer to that: The legacy of segregation. This meant that black Memphis still "suffers from" stratospheric levels of crime and low education achievement and for which it seems African-Americans bear no responsibility. Kemp added that blacks are imprisoned at six times the rate of Whites, the link between crime and punishment apparently too subtle for this investigative journalist to grasp.

Lady Savant's question was direct and interesting: Say Whites finally rebelled against the black plague of crime and dependence what could they actually do in practice? 

My proposals:

First you could offer a substantial 'return' to Africa financial inducement. This is not a glib or facile suggestion. I worked out here the average lifetime costs of a black family to White taxpayers to be in the region of €2 million. Given their impulsive short-term gibs- me-dat-now mentality I'd say the majority would jump at the offer of a tax-free 200k cheque. Then there's payment for voluntary sterilisation, which of course would have to be accompanied by changes in welfare, reversing the current system which encourages indiscriminate breeding. What would blacks lose? Could still muh dick to their hearts' content - and their chilluns aren't exactly the centre of their lives anyway.

My final proposal is a return to the kind of rigid race-based authoritarianism that applied in the Post Reconstruction American South up to about 1950 and under apartheid South Africa. Such a regimen was predicated on the correct assumptions that blacks in general were of low intelligence, impulsive and criminally-oriented, rendering them unsuited for White society. The regimen was supported by a range of segregation laws and a no-nonsense police force aided by other less formal enforcement mechanisms. And woe betide any black committing a crime of violence against Whites, especially against White women. (This is a horrific example of what could happen). Miscegenation even where legal (and it often was not) incurred severe social sanctions.

Th net effect was that blacks and Whites developed a modus vivendi, each knowing his place and the rules of engagement. Not ideal or fair, but then what society is? The fact is that black criminality and the welfare drag on productive law-abiding citizens were but a fraction of what they are today. Whites were able to enjoy the civilisation they and their forebears had hewn from the wilderness. Indeed blacks may have been more content than they are now - crazy as that might sound in today's bizarro world - with stable family structures the norm and nobody stoking their grievances.

That these sensible solutions not alone would never be considered but could possible land their author in jail underlines the depth of our civilisational decay.

Wednesday, 19 April 2017


'No other south American country has succeeded so successfully to integrate [sic] so many different races of people: whites, blacks, Asians, American Indians, and the indigenous population which have together formed today’s “Brazilian” people with their warm, sincere, and creative characteristics. This population of mixed cultures adore their country, support their national football team and passionately share their lives with their co-nationals, without giving importance to the colour of the skin.' 

This panegyric to Brazil is not untypical. There's always a carnival featuring beautiful scantily-clad racial hybrids happily cavorting in the streets. Always presented as a colourful, vibrant, post-racial success story. The reality could hardly be more different because Brazil is a poster child for poverty, violence, crime and corruption - corruption which permeates every aspect of life and reaches from the lowest favela dweller to the Presidential Palace. Now Ireland has its faults and our society is far more enriched (and hence atomised) than it used to be. But when our police went on strike some time ago nobody really noticed. Life went on the same way with no uptick in crime.

Compare this to Brazil where a police strike resulted in apocalyptic scenes of criminality. "Bloodthirsty mob takes over city's streets leaving trail of death and rape after police go on strike" blared the Mirror's headline. The report went on: Dead bodies are being left in pools of blood in the streets as gangs wielding guns and machetes launch a relentless rampage. lawless gangs wielding guns and machetes appear to be running riot - while dead bodies line the streets. "There are people running around with guns in pretty populated areas, dozens of people stealing from malls, even dead bodies on streets."

Such a society is totally screwed up. Screwed up beyond redemption. But they get by with a kind of pigmentocracy which sees a tiny elite pf wealthy Whites living charmed lives in gated communities while at the bottom, scrabbling to survive, swarms a gigantic hostile dark-hued helotry. Ordinary Whites are somewhere in between, unmoored, destined to a demi-monde existence like South Africa's Whites farmers.

Here's the point, my friends. If current trends persist it's what the United States and many other Western countries will look like in 2050. 

Saturday, 15 April 2017

Frightening times indeed

For the first time since the mid-sixties I believe nuclear war to be terrifyingly close. The Trump regime seems hell (sic) bent on provoking a major conflict with Russia. And anyone else that likes to join in, the more the merrier.  That Russia poses no threat to America or Europe is beside the point. The US Administration is like that bellicose drunk who wants a fight and will not be dissuaded by logic or appeasement. Eventually you have to deck the fucker because there's no alternative. That's the way I'd feel if I were in Putin's shoes.

What's behind this insanity? A commentator on Zero Hedge says this: 'You, like many Americans, still believe that people make a difference in American politics - elect the right bloke and things will change for the better. 

The undeniable fact is that your government has been taken over by others who don't even recognise the people of America as anything other than enemies of the state. No one in America will reach the presidency who has not been vetted deeply by these folks. And if by some VERY remote chance someone did get through the screen, they would be instantly marginalised or assassinated - as was Trump.

You have lost your country. Face it

Reminds me of what Alexander Solzhenitzyn wrote in '200 Years Together'.

'You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the ‘Russian Revolution.’ It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people.'

To better understand what's going on read The Monomorium Analogy.

Tuesday, 11 April 2017

Fergal Keane: SJW extraordinaire

What a difference 22 years make. When I first interviewed Aung San Suu Kyi she was a humble Nobel Peace Prize winner while I was the BBC's star foreign correspondent. Now she's Burma's President while I....well I still work for the Beeb ('The Most Trusted Name In Fake News') but as a marginalised figure. While I've devoted my life to equality, anti-racism and the cause of the oppressed I must admit I feel a little hard done by. You see the BBC don't really want you if you're White, male, straight and non-Jewish. The only thing I have going for me is that I'm not English but that's not enough any more.

In my interview Aung San Suu Kyi disappointed me. Clearly success has gone to her head. That happens to a lot of people you know. She refused to take my point that the unfortunate Rohinga are being ethnically cleansed even when I explained to her that I had just been to that part of the country. 'I've lived here all my life so maybe I know something as well' she waspishly shot back. So unlike Nelson Mandela, who maintained his humility up to the end of his magnificent life. I remember his generosity even after becoming President. "Had it not been for your fearless reporting Fergal our country would still not be free".  "Madiba, you are too kind" I blushingly responded.

What a man.

In case you're wondering Rwanda is the reason I'm so worked up about the Rohinga gig. You see I got there too late to save the situation. That thought haunts me to this day. I saw the slaughter first hand. From the penthouse suite at the Kigali Hilton. I looked in horror as the locals (clearly suffering from the legacy of colonialism) hacked and gouged one another in an orgy of slaughter. A knock on the door distracted me from the grisly spectacle. It was room service. Eating dinner I mused that at €95 my simple bottle of Chateau d’Yquem Sauternes 55 cost half a year's salary for the average Rwandan. Life is so unfair. But I've suffered as well. Like at that restaurant in Kiev where they served red wine with my fish. You don't forget things like that.

No, it's not easy being a virtue-signalling anti-racist. But I soldier on, serving my shyster globohomo overlords by repackaging inconvenient facts in support of the Official Narrative. You must understand that the Truth is a rare and precious commodity ... we must be economical with it.


Friday, 7 April 2017

Hope dies...

Whatever lingering hopes I had for Trump are dying fast. One retreat/betrayal after another. Using the farcical pretext of civilian casualties Trump has ordered missile strikes on Syrian forces while the Administration daily ramps up the anti-Russian rhetoric. A farcical pretext, and seeing Nikki Haley (known to her Indian parents as Nimrata Randhawa) holding up pictures of disfigured children at the UN brought back chilling memories of  Colin Powell brandishing similar fabrications to get the Iraq war started. What happened to the campaign promises to work with Putin in solving the Syrian crisis and eliminate ISIS? 

Well one thing that's happened is the elevation of Jared Kushner and the sidelining of Steve Bannon. Bannon is an American patriot and Kushner a Chabad Jew. Understand that even most Israelis hate the Chabad-Lubovich sect and fear their rapidly growing power. They see them as insane and dangerous. For example after the death of their erstwhile leader Rabbi Mendel Schneerson a few years ago his followers hung around for days expecting him to rise from the dead!  

Jewish Middle East expert Alan Brownfield tells us.  “Rabbi Schneerson always supported Israeli wars and opposed any retreat. In 1974 he strongly opposed the Israeli withdrawal from the Suez area. He promised Israel divine favors if it persisted in occupying the land. Among the religious settlers in the occupied territories, the Chabad Hassids constitute one of the most extreme groups. Baruch Goldstein, the mass murderer of Palestinians, was one of them.”

Another one of them is Rabbi Yitzchak Ginsburg who heads up a major Chabad institution in the West Bank. Ginsburg praised Goldstein and considers all non-Jews to be subhuman. According to author Motti Inbari, Ginsburg “gives prominence to Halachic and Kabbalistic approaches that emphasize the distinction between Jew and non-Jew (Gentile), imposing a clear separation and hierarchy in this respect. He claims that while the Jews are the Chosen People and were created in God’s image, the Gentiles do not have this status and are effectively considered subhuman.”

Nice people, those Chabads, aren't they? 

And the Co-President of the United States (who recently visited Schneerson's grave)  is one of them. 

Let that fact sink in. 

Given that Kushner spends most of his time working for "peace" in the Middle East should the renewed war on Syria (and possibly Russia as well) come as any surprise? As an aside Kushner is also working hard on financial services "reform". Bear in mind that his father is a convicted felon in the Bernie Madoff mode, serving time in a Federal penitentiary for racketeering, tax evasion and witness tampering. Talk about having monkeys look after the bananas. Meanwhile Kushner packs key positions in the Administration with his Jewish cronies. ZOG was never this good even under Obama or Bush.

Now maybe, just maybe, Trump is playing a long game. Maybe the crushing power of the MIC-Ziocon-Wall Street nexus has dawned on him and he's retrenching. But I'm not optimistic. As the great Enoch Powell once observed "History is littered with wars which everybody knew would never happen."

Trump is not the saviour and the future has seldom looked more dangerous.

Monday, 3 April 2017

News flash: Fight outside London pub!!!

A drunken mob leaves a Croydon pub (ironically named The Goat) and beats up three passers-by. Now maybe I was reared hard but this does not seem like a story to make headline news. And make headline news it did, front-paging The Guardian, The Sun, The Telegraph and was briefly the lead on the BBC and Sky "news" channels. In fact, believe it or not, Britain's Prime Minister got involved, describing the attack as "utterly despicable". Which indeed it was. But in enriched areas of London (and today that means most of the city) shootings, stabbings and mass brawls are par for the course. According to Wikipedia in 2008–09 (latest available figures quoted) there were no fewer than 70,962 assault with injury offences in London.

So....enquiring minds want to know what made this particular assault if not one in a million at least one in 70,962. The explanation lies with the victims who in this case represented the most protected species on the planet, on a par with the lesser spotted barn owl and leatherback sea turtle: Muslim 'asylum' seekers. It's not too much of a stretch to suggest that the attackers were primarily native British -  what Tom Wolfe called The Great White Defendants. Glittering careers beckon for the law officers who track them down and for the judges who put them away for a long long time.

Then again the Great White Defendants might be lucky. Like the Somali girl gang who kicked an English girl in the head while yelling 'kill the white slag'. They got off with a warning.

Friday, 31 March 2017

The strange case of Max Eichholtz and the SS man

Unless you're a deranged libtard (but I repeat  myself) you despair at today's Western legal systems criminalising what once would have been regarded as merely rude or insulting. The younger among us must wonder what things were like in the old days (prior to the 1960s) or, Heaven forfend, in Nazi Germany.  Well children prepare to be gobsmacked because what follows in an extract from The Jews and Germans of Hamburg: The Destruction of a Civilization 1790-1945 by (((JAS Grenville))). Grenville was born Hans Guhrauer and fled Germany in 1939.

"Max Eichholtz took pride in being a Jew.  A lawyer by profession, a brilliant speaker and a prominent politician of the Weimar era representing the German Democratic Party in Hamburg's Parliament, he was a thorn in the side of the Nazis. He was also a decorated veteran and possessed courage. Not many would have dared take an SS man to court in November 1934 for calling them 'a dirty Jew'. He reminded the judge that, as a lawyer, he was part of the administration of justice and so could call on the special protection of the public prosecutor's office which 'made no distinction between Aryan and non-Aryan'. It tells us something about the ambiguities of Nazi control in the mid-1930s that he won his case. The SS man was required to pay a fine or serve a token two days in prison." (pp 110-111).

Yes, you read that right. In Hitler's Germany a Jew successfully prosecuted an SS man for calling him a filthy Jew.  In conclusion note that as this incident was playing out a major campaign was underway in the West to rescue "Germany's six million Jews" (ten times the actual number) who were apparently at risk of immediate annihilation.

Tuesday, 28 March 2017

Divine comedy

Sport is looked at with a jaundiced eye by many on the alt-right, being correctly seen as a component of the panem et circenses deployed by the NWO globalists to distract and neutralise the White masses. They've also found it a boon (whoops!) in that it showcases the only activities where blacks can equal Whites. (See shiksas, dark meat good for breeding!). But there was a time when sport embodied blood and soil, nationalism and local pride. The local football team was made up of local men and this form of rootedness spread up to regional and national level. Which was why it had to be destroyed.  In those days the very idea of a black on a European national team would have been sacrilegious. Now various forms of mystery meat predominate in the "national" teams of England, France, Holland and Belgium (others are headed the same way) while club sides have lost all connection with their localities.

The money and effort expended on this project by the globalists have been astounding. But they're not satisfied with displacing White men with coloured men. No, they want da wimminz in the game as well. We're all equal after all. Hence the relentless propagandising of women's sports and the shoehorning of women into every last male sporting preserve. Even rugby, that most manly of sports is now infested with a plethora of airheads spouting their vacuous nonsense while useless women's competitions are forced down the TV audience's throat. This particular development is making me incandescent with rage I have to tell you.

But out of evil sometimes cometh good. Because now that transgenders have been allowed in women's bathrooms you can hardly keep them out of women's competitions. And given that your sex is now what you proclaim it to be we find that many second-rate male athletes are transforming themselves into first-class women athletes by the simple expedient of declaring themselves women. What prizes and money beckon as even the Olympic Committee have arrangements to cater for trasngenders. So expect a lot more Caster Semenyas. And there's also the little matter of athletic scholarships, approximately 60% of which currently go to women.  Sorry Carol, that free place in college your were hoping for has gone instead to Willamina (known to his parents as Bill).

Libtard lunacy has come full circle to bite them in their smug asses. They're in an exquisite bind. If they side with transgenders, they discriminate against women who were born women. If they side with women who were born women the discriminate against transgenders. Meanwhile as sexual dimorphism becomes the crime du jour the number of gender identities increases daily as every freak imaginable makes its claim for unique identity. Sort that lot out, ladies!  If they don't (and they won't) the trannies will destroy women's sports.

Pass the popcorn!