Sunday, 23 March 2014

The Ghost Of Nastiest Uncles Past

As I explained in earlier posts, the reason I banned NU was not because of his views or how he expressed them, rather that the comment facility had degenerated into the trading of insults, distracting everyone from the content of the post itself.  I don't mind off-topic comments at all, ones that bring an interesting bit of information to the table - UN being a particularly worthy representative of this genre. 

But of late NU is being brought back in, either directly or indirectly, attracting responses from what appears to be NU himself under various noms de guerre.  With the same result..... the threads are becoming a mess.  I'm not going back to pre-approving comments but what I will do is delete each reference to His Nastyship and reserve the right to ban any persistent offender.

117 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thank you merciful God!

Ivan

Keiser said...

How the West was won!

The Truth Will Out said...

Thank fuck for that!

Rachel said...

Good morning Savant. I'm sorry you have to put in this extra work, but I think it's necessary. There have been numerous threads consisting of only insults and taunts. I do believe that this type of thing serves to detract from your otherwise valid and logical arguments. Further, the commenters who actually have something to say have become scarce lately. Personally, Ive always read way more than I write here and I miss the quality dialogue and links from the commenters. Thank you for restoring order to this once happy place. Best, Rachel

Anonymous said...

nice one
dofornow

Dan said...

Now that you have cleaned house you can clean up Ireland. Be ruthless.

AnalogMan said...

Well, it's a start. At least we'll be spared James' interminable stupid dialogues. But I don't think it will be enough. You know what will happen. The Unmentionable One will take it as permission to run riot anonymously without fear of being called out.

Now, what group of people do we know that changes their names to blend in, for the purpose of undermining the host society, and makes it illegitimate to name them?

What the hell use is it to ban the troll, then punish anybody who points out that he's ignoring the ban?

Furthermore, you've just given carte blanche for "his views and how he expressed them". If we're going back to that kind of obscenity, kiss your blog goodbye.

Anonymous said...

Savant, some action is clearly needed.

But as far as I can see he came here to disagree with certain positions taken by other posters then was insulted then insulted them back. Hardly his fault. If you were going to ban him for insulting people then why not ban everyone who insulted him as well.

It's a shame all this happened because I used to enjoy his rebuttals of commonly held misconceptions. He certainly changed my mind about a few thing and he pretty much cleaned up in the 9/11 debate.

The problem recently has been people who are obsessed with him like that James character who seems to have some genuine mental issues. He made like 550 posts last month and nearly all of them were him talking to himself. It screws up the blog because you have to skip past every other post.

Dan said...

Not so.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NcxI5wpDueE

Wolfowitz clearly knew about the attack before the attack.

Anonymous said...

If people were so certain that they were right then why did they ever feel so threatened by him in the first place?
If your beliefs don't stand up to scrutiny, then don't get upset with someone who comes along and proves your beliefs wrong.
Banning him just made him the winner. It's like how TPTB try to ban any viewpoint other than "climate change is real", "multiculturalism is great" and so on, in order that the flock do not get any ideas above their station.

Dan said...

What the hell use is it to ban the troll, then punish anybody who points out that he's ignoring the ban?

That's the point of this post IMHO. I think that Mary, who appeared here a few times only to point out the mysterious indulgences by Sav as highly suspect. he's already on here crowing about "being proved victorious" because he was banned.

Anonymous said...

Savant, I enjoy reading your blogs and the many interesting comments as well. Unfortunately and predictably the comments section always goes off the rails into Jew rants and related issues. I'm "Jew wise" myself but it just gets boring after a while. Perhaps your new policy will help to curb that.

Anonymous said...

Hopefully this'll stop all those people who assume that anyone not towing the party line is most definitely, without a shadow of a doubt, The Unmentionable One. Like there is only one person in the world who holds his views.
Let's get back to what blogs are there for - discussion - without everyone not towing the party line being labelled as a Jew.
If your point doesn't stand the test of reality, then change it rather than lashing out like a child.

Amsterdam Bez

Lady Frog said...

He, maybe I'm banned too !

1 Savant : " I don't mind off-topics at all " , its less of a pb for the writer or the author of a blog , but for readers it's a pain . Thats why I've been so harsh with Nilus for ex , when the majority thought his continuous off topics and copy pastes were " fantastic " ,.For me , it has ruined this blog , even more than the hashbarateries from NU . It makes the comment section incoherent , anarchic and difficult to read , especially for people like me who
Are most of the time on android devices . I could have " deal " with it , but what I can't tolerate is the dirrespect for Savant's work and the take
Over of the entire blog .
The dumbest part was that when someone wanted to put a spot to this logorrhea , we were accused to be NU or hshbarats or " kikes " , its ridiculous .

2 Most of the comments from the supposed new NU aren't even from the original one , I did my Sherlok Holmes and they are from - horresco referens - the same person I talk above ( same words , same style ) , James and countless other facetious . So how to moderate with this anarchy ?


3 the pb with NU , or the false pb with NU : he is or was only a pb because some wannabe web warriors gave him an unnecessary attention .
Most of the the time , I didn't read him . Point . Pb solved .

Anonymous said...

The whole point of the Hasbarat is to defend the evil doings of the Chosen by acting as a disinterested party to distract and deceive. If this strategy fails then disrupt and destabilize. Until now this technique has worked against whole countries - not just blogs like Savants.

Rick

L.Frog said...

Sorry : "a stop to this logorrhea " , grrr virtual keyboard .

L.Frog said...

Sorry : "a stop to this logorrhea " , grrr virtual keyboard .

Dan said...

It took over a variety of sites like Dkos and Huffpo many years ago.

Anonymous said...

The whole point of the Hasbarat is to defend and justify the evil doings of the Chosen by acting as a disinterested party - to distract and deceive. If this strategy fails, then destabilise and destroy.
This technique is regularly used against whole populations - not just Savant's blog.
Nasty or another of his tribe will find a way back somehow - the stakes for his people have never been higher.

Rick

Anonymous said...

"Anonymous Anonymous said...

The whole point of the Hasbarat is to defend the evil doings of the Chosen by acting as a disinterested party to distract and deceive. If this strategy fails then disrupt and destabilize. Until now this technique has worked against whole countries - not just blogs like Savants.

Rick

23 March 2014 14:20"

This is a prime example of what's wrong.

From your mindset, no one can possibly disagree with what you say unless they they are some kind of agent, sent to disrupt you. You live in a kind of wartime dreamworld in which you are the constant victim, constantly under attack, and only you know the truth. If only you can get the truth out to the masses, but you can't because of the actions of the "hasbarats".

Now, you may call me a Jew, then be on your way.

Dan said...

The posts were a Hitchens quote a Franz Boaz quote and a Noel Ignatiev quote. There was another that I couldn't find.

I found it difficult to distinguish between these quotes and YKW and YKW. Except the aphorisms were actually of a high literary quality rather than scatological.

lady Frog said...

The truth is maybe between what Rick said and the last anonymous . About this blog , the pb is , for some 10 % real hashbaraterie 90 % of fantasmatic war-on-the web from immature teens and disturbed spirits .Most of the supposed posts from NU weren't even from NU .

Has the blog some issues ? Double-posts when we publish ?

Anonymous said...

NU - was he posting from just one IP address?

Dan said...

Are you the one migrating from South Africa?

What's your opinion on William Kentridge?

I recently saw his two exhibitions at The Met in NYC and at Hunter College.

I realized how much damage erudite guys like him have done in South Africa. he's now King of The Art World. The intrinsic merit of his work escapes me though.

Dan said...

More woe from London

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/03/pak-attack-human-rights-with-a-vibrant-twist/


The trouble with the west today. If you cede your capital cities to the foreign they have the whip hand over you.

The Paki is intolerable and numerous. Like a cockroach. I'm reminded of the delightfully charming Imran Khan back in the 1980s and his deceptive media profile gladly constructed by the BBC. The astonishing blindness to his family's fundamentalism and hostility to white Britons was never ever broached. Now we see a relative of his play histrionic games as he attempts to hijack a London campus.

Essex boy said...

Savant, be in no doubt. All this fucking about was a deliberate attempt to fuck up the blog. No doubt at all.

Anonymous said...

Maybe St. Nilus will finally return now that no one will refer to his mudshark sister, or his sexuality.

Dan said...

This is what David Aaronovitch said to that bloke in Barking on Question Time:

'even though you are experiencing this, it's still not true'

Sadly this is what we get for a press corps these days. A bloated toad, first or second generation Pale refugee telling an ordinary bloke that he's imagining the carpet ripped from under his feet.

Not only is the carpet not being yanked away, there was never a carpet in the first place, the carpet is also a loaner to him and he owes interest and now the carpet is in Aaronovitch's house and Aaronovitch's pet negro is curled up on it happily sleeping off a hangover that the bloke paid for out of his taxes. And if this bloke disagrees: he's the problem.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Anonymous said...

Savant, some action is clearly needed.

... He certainly changed my mind about a few thing and he pretty much cleaned up in the 9/11 debate.

"... pretty much cleaned up"? I think you meant: "... Got pretty much cleaned up"?

There. Fixed it

... and BTW, nice try, Enyoo. You really get the old jewdar pinging. You dog, you.

Seriously though, I found a great deal of excellent and thought provoking links from James ... but, God, the NU/James double act was getting really, really old.

UN
.

Rob said...

I still think you should go back to moderating all the comments, Savant, allowing OT ones at your discretion. A forum where anyone could start their own thread would be the right format to sort out the chaos of comments here.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
From your mindset, no one can possibly disagree with what you say unless they they are some kind of agent, sent to disrupt you. You live in a kind of wartime dreamworld in which you are the constant victim, constantly under attack, and only you know the truth. If only you can get the truth out to the masses, but you can't because of the actions of the "hasbarats".

Now, you may call me a Jew, then be on your way.

23 March 2014 14:39


Change the very last word to "Nazis" "Racists" "White Extremists" ... or an old favourite -- "White Supremacists" and the whole context does a one-eighty.

A handy little template ... no?

Don't let the door hit you in the arse, Yehudi.

One has to wonder if the last few comments in this thread are Parthian Shots, a "Dignified Retreat" -- or a temporary marshalling of resources, before the next onslaught.

I know what my money's on.
Like rust, they never sleep.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

Does kentridge still live in the utopia his parents fought so hard to get?

Or is he like the other utopiasts that hauled ass to the racist white colonies seeing that the utopia they fought so hard to get is anything but.

Suzman, paton's widow, and slovo's daughter, none of them will admit they were duped into fighting the elites war for maximum profit disguised as human rights

That is to ppl like that the amount of ppl(blacks) that now live on less than a dollar a day has more than doubled in 20yrs, how do they feel about that, silence of course and a lot of hand wringing, Johannesburg which was a vibrant city is a veritable trashed shithole, a shithole that not even Nigerian scum want to live in, thanks liberals, if I had the power I would make all of you live in the shithole you had a hand in creating.

So where does this illustrious beacon of consciousness live now, South Africa? In a fortified fort in the well to do suburbs? Or does he live in aus or some other white haven?

How can people believe in an ideal so delusionlly that the very ideal that they striving after threatens the very life of the people that the ideal is meant to help, it's as if someone needs a blood transfusion to save their life, but the only blood available is HIV laced blood

It's like the communists, their ideal of equality is such a sacred cow that they will exterminate everyone in order to get it, eventually there are no ppl around to express that equality deal, doesn't make much sense

How can ideas be above ppl, isn't ppl the reason for the ideas, are ideals so sacred that the cost of everyone's life is worth the ideal.

Is freedom so worthy that nuking the planet and losing the people for whose freedom they fighting for are no longer around to have that freedom? That's liberal idealists and how they think

The sacredness of their deals is above everything else, including human life, they actually hate humans for sullying their ideals, their ideals are perfect and humans show that those ideals are not perfect, liberal idealists are misanthropists cause they willing to sacrifice every human for the sake of their ideals.

These are the ppl we have allowed to formulate public opinion, because they have the degrees and higher learning etc etc

The Dalai Lama will never be like Nelson Mandela, cause he will never tell the ppl of Tibet to slaughter themselves for freedom, the Dalai Lama actually puts humans ahead of ideals, what use is freedom if everyone is dead?

Anonymous said...

That smug Scottish weasel Mike Gove whines that there are too many old Etonians in gvt. What nerve! The gimp-in-chief of the F-O-Israel lobby complaining about being UNREPRESENTATIVE: that, my friends, is what his pimpmeisters call CHUTZPAH.

Whatever your opinions of Etonians (mine aren't all positive), they can hardly be described as a HOSTILE ELITE. They are generally the same race as those they rule, with overlapping interests. The same cannot be said for that Scots midget. I console myself with the thought that he is such a weak gimp that his rubber lips will asphyxiate him next time Nethanyahoo puts his kosher sausage in the gimp's mouth.

I imagine the unelected puppet masters are even less Etonian and more GovanGimpGove's masters. Not that he'll ever draw attention to it!

Dan said...

Content wise David Aaronovitch could have said it.

'even though you are experiencing this, it's still not true'

Not that Aaronovitch, wouldn't turn around an play Pontius Pilate and passive aggressively question the validity of the concept of "truth" anyway.

The bloke from Barking had a point. Aaronovitch then went on to bait the guy with the fact that Aaronovitch's grandfather was a migrant, he even highlighted the Jewishness of his POV. The guy didn't take the bait, which Aaron was dangling there. You could almost see Aaron wishing the bloke blurted out "you are a Jewish swine!" Aaron was instead upstaged by the bloke who stalked off.

If the truth is a construct, as opposed to subjective which is at least concrete in POV, according to liberalism and and multiracialism then that angry white guy has a good point. He's experiencing something that is political and aimed at destroying him.

Keiser said...

Anonymous said...
NU - was he posting from just one IP address?

23 March 2014 16:13


That's one place I would draw the line, no i.p. info on anyone even if it is vague!

Not that I'm worried in the slightest but it is just really bad form to do so and thankfully Savant does not suffer from bad form.

Dan said...

He's an adoptee.

Looking at him, my Jewdar goes off.

James said...

The Unmentionable One will take it as permission to run riot anonymously without fear of being called out.


Are we allowed to mention the unmentionable one if we think he's back?

James said...

Lady Frog said:
Most of the supposed posts from NU weren't even from NU .


That is untrue.
I got very attuned to his way of speaking and he was very easy to identify after some practice.

95% of the 475 Anonymous posts in the last month were him.

James said...

Nastiestuncle expressed very orthodox (interesting word that, on a blog like this), views about homosexuality.

"Hardwired" was his favourite word.

Not a deep thinker, him.

A recent article on Henry Makow about gays had this comment:

I come from a family steeped in the performing arts, dated a woman who was a ballet dancer and had mainly gay male friends, lived with a gay couple and worked in an industry that was very gay, so I can relate to another response that talked about their behavior being pretty much psychotic. Oh, and I had a gay neighbor who I was friends with for a while, a "bear" (very much masculine in appearance and general demeanor) who confirmed all generalities or stereotypes concerning their promiscuity and/or drug abuse. One thing I've noticed, if it hasn't already been mentioned, is how women relate to their sense of victimization. Once, I found a journal my girlfriend at the time had been writing, and there was a short story about how she gave blood to a friend dying of AIDS and how, through a botched transfusion, she wound up with the virus as well. She made it seem tragic, yet heroic. Really disturbed me (this was many years ago). The fact that many gays actually like giving it to each other and love to "ride bareback" seems to get ignored in order to favor their helplessness. Here in the United States, gay marriage is the lead story in every MSM news broadcast. The second is socialized healthcare providing birth control for women and the outrage of the Catholic Church. Gay marriage being a polarizing topic that most people would not concern themselves with otherwise. From all I've seen, gay men do not desire a Leave it to Beaver/Father Knows Best domestic partnership existence that would include children. They want to party, take drugs, and hook up with each other. Lasting relationships are few and far between. Yet, we are conditioned to believe that they are being abused by patriarchy, and women really grab onto that. They're usually standing IN FRONT at rallies to legalize same sex unions. You see, they're victims of abuse too, mostly through perception, not actual fact or experience.

So gayness is almost a death cult.
But we knew that.

James said...

Another comment from a woman said she got a few of her male friends off being gay.

They thanked her for it.

James said...

Zionists Deny Their Holocausts

Michael Hoffman blasts book about Menachim Begin.


There is a theory that the Germans helped build the bombs that were dropped on Japan, and that the Americans were having a lot of trouble actually getting the bomb to work.

More here

Anonymous said...

That puts St. Nilus' over indulgence of alcohol in perspective. Thank you for the insight, James.

James said...

Saul David Alinsky (January 30, 1909 - June 12, 1972) was an American community organizer, Communist agent and author of, "Rules for Radicals". From that book here are Saul's thoughts on creating a Communist state:
There are 8 levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a socialist state. The first is the most important.

1) Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the people

2) Poverty - Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3) Debt - Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4) Gun Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5) Welfare - Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)

6) Education - Take control of what people read and listen to - take control of what children learn in school.

7) Religion - Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.

8) Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor. Any of this sound familiar?

The standard liberal response will be that this is BS and that you see radicals in your cornflakes, but those people are just "useful idiots", helping along the communists and discouraging their patriotic countrymen who actually have the ability to see what's going on.

James said...

Certain people would say healthcare is controlled to prevent quacks from selling snake oil and harming kids with bogus gender treatments and "curing" gays.
Certain people will probably love communism once it takes over then.

They wouldn't.--Certain people.

Well then, certain people should stop detracting from anti-communist posts on the Internet. It is obvious from the above list, and from Marx's 10 planks of Communism that this is where the world is tending.

But that's just progress. How else could the system work?--Certain people again

One wonders...

James said...

Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against his former friend and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein who had 'regular' orgies at his Caribbean compound that the former president visited multiple times

Dirty.

James said...

After too much sluttery, young woman are turning to purity.

Perhaps they are finally realising that "Aplha Males" (a.k.a. pickup artists) aren't that great after all.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2586036/You-married-Lord-daddy-boyfriend-Purity-Balls-girls-gift-virginity-fathers-marriage-sweep-America.html

This is to be expected. Soon we will cycle back to Victorian prudishness.

It is a perfect example of a cyclical game in game theory.

Anonymous said...

I gave up watching QT years ago. Bad fir the blood pressure. That upper class twit presenter doesn't even bother to hide the Marxist chosenite propaganda any more.

Anonymous said...

“It's a shame all this happened because I used to enjoy his rebuttals of commonly held misconceptions. He certainly changed my mind about a few thing and he pretty much cleaned up in the 9/11 debate,” says the little nose behind the curtain.

LOL!!!

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

“Maybe St. Nilus will finally return now that no one will refer to his mudshark sister, or his sexuality,” says the little nose behind the curtain.

LOL!!!

Frank Galton

David said...

Good move Savant.

Meanwhile the UK moves closer to an Islamic republic:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2587215/Sharia-Law-enshrined-British-legal-lawyers-guidelines-drawing-documents-according-Islamic-rules.html

Iron Felix said...

Savant you are right. Much commentary is very lowgrade---squalid, puerile namecalling, mostly---and it does degrade the content of an otherwise excellent blog

parisclaims said...

Well done. I used to look forward to the comments almost as much as the topic post. Nowadays I just read the post and don't bother with reading the comments. I expect that will change.

Anonymous said...

James said:

“CERTAIN PEOPLE would say this...

They wouldn't.--CERTAIN PEOPLE”

LOL!!!

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

I am offended by both mudsharkery, and homosexuality.
Once they go black, they are not wanted back.

Anonymous said...

@ A certain person 12:50

What’s your opinion on the JEWS Frank Cohen aka “Frank Collin”, Joseph Cohen aka “Yousef Mohamid Al-Khattab”, and the “Archbishop of Canterbury” Justin Welby?

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...


This is funny.

youtube.com/watch?v=kvoh7z548fA

Anonymous said...

Another bunch of worthless niggers that we have to put up with because it’s GOOD FOR THE JEWS.

15-year-old girl 'shot dead by male friend' in East London house as three boys aged just 15 and 16 are questioned by police

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2587024/Pictured-15-year-old-girl-shot-dead-male-friend-East-London-house-three-teenage-boys-questioned.html

Note how the Jew/Zionist-controlled media describes this worthless negress:

The Daily Nazi (Mail) “The teenager was a STAR PUPIL..”.

ITV local news: “a young ENTREPRENEUR...”

http://www.itv.com/news/london/update/2014-03-23/friends-pay-tribute-to-shooting-victim-shereka-marsh/

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

Quote from that useless cunt, shabbos goy George W Bush: "The problem with the French is that they don't have a word for entrepreneur."

LOL!!!

Frank Galton

Dan said...

Entrepreneur or small time drug dealer?

Anonymous said...

"September the 4th, 2001, I stood in the ruins of the Twin Towers. It's a day I will never forget." – George W Bush

LOL!!!

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

Quote from shabbos goy George W Bush: "The problem with the French is that they don't have a word for entrepreneur."

LOL!!!

Frank Galton

Tony VA said...

"The problem with the French is that they don't have a word for entrepreneur."

Surely that's not true is it? Even Dubbya could not be that dumb?

And even with all Pappy's help and contacts Bush failed totally himself as an entrepreneur.

What a POS.

Dan said...

He did say it. Probably a slightly tongue in cheek dig at them. His stupidity is mainly a folksy front.

An arsey snickering press don't help either. Bush was mainly a bully and a salesman for Jewish wars.

Dan said...

The Met just released coverage of the gang talking their prey.

A BBC exclusive

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=A1WBs74W4ik

Anonymous said...

Tony VA,

More Bushisms:

"I couldn't imagine somebody like Osama bin Laden understanding the joy of Hanukkah."

"It's in our country's interests to find those who would do harm to us and get them out of harm's way."

“Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

"I'm honoured to shake the hand of a brave Iraqi citizen who had his hand cut off by Saddam Hussein." ROTFLOL!!!

"For every fatal shooting, there were roughly three non-fatal shootings. And, folks, this is unacceptable in America. It's just unacceptable. And we're going to do something about it."

"One of the great things about books is sometimes there are some fantastic pictures."

"Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?"

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/george-bushs-50-worst-bloopers-

LOL!!!

Frank Galton

Dan said...

Never attribute to stupidity, that which you can attribute to a snickering fratboy with a vicious sense of entitlement.

James said...

Off topic, but...

White Genocide is “off topic” says Dean Scharf

After having logged thousands of hours working over professional anti-whites and their underlings, the most effective treatment I have ever witnessed is The Silent Treatment. This is truly the only viable option for those complicit or openly promoting our destruction.

We need to stay “On topic” or “You’re off topic” shuts the pro-white dissent down before it gets out of hand and “we’ve already covered that” and “I’ll look into it” are deflection techniques at a professor’s disposal should anyone wade too far into the verboten subject matter.


Certain people would say that other people would say this Schart guy is saying that because he is a certain type of person.

Certain people always say that, but that's because so many of these certain types of people certainly do say certain things a lot of the time. It's certainly more than a coincidence, and acquires a certain amount of certainty the more it happens.

James said...

C'mon guys, let's get serious....

and Professor Scharf’s response was *SILENCE*

Bob, Daniel Genseric, Tom Bowie and I attended an International Law MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) taught by one of the world’s leading experts in international criminal law and genocide, Professor Michael Scharf, Dean and Director of the Frederick K. Cox International Law Center at Case Western University in Cleveland Ohio.

Due to the fast paced environment of the online chat, Daniel accidentally addressed the professor as “Dean Schart” at one point, but a cordial ambience was otherwise maintained with Bob frequently interjecting well timed advice for the professor, such as “Get back to the safety of your classroom where you don’t have to contend with free speech!”

And indeed Bob’s advice proved sagacious because many of the MOOC participants began showing an interest in the reality of White genocide and expressing suspicion at the professor’s awkward silences.

The professor predictably sought refuge in the Holocaust™, but Genseric was hot on his tail with a Nick Griffin rejoinder:

“Six million? We’re talking about six-hundred-million!”


Certain people would get their buzzers out and say this is ridiculous.

But really, the most ridiculous thing is that anti-whites openly push GENOCIDE, as if it's the decent thing to do.

Note that this PROFESSIONAL LIBERAL was SILENCED by the truth.

His only response was "The big H".

Well, Whitey's got a bigger H now!

600 million beats 6 million every time.

Thanks Nick Griffin.

Certain people would disagree (start the insults), but they are irrelevant. The discourse has gone up a notch.

White Genocide is a topic now!

To hell with their righteousness and bullshit.

Anonymous said...

Nick Griffin on Russia Today

Ukrainian nationalists are being used by Zionists
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6Ir2rWzkFk

WARNING! Due to Nick Griffin’s views on bum bandits a certain person may be offended.

Frank Galton

James said...

More affirmation to make certain people feel better than certain other people.

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-03-18/pssst-everything-s-a-conspiracy

PSSSSSSSST. It certainly is.--A certain person.

Anonymous said...

Although there has been some disruption over the past week, I think it worked out in the end. That loser St. Nilus has been successfully purged from the comment section; all's well that ends well.

Anonymous said...

“Although there has been some disruption over the past week, I think it worked out in the end. That loser St. Nilus has been successfully purged from the comment section; all's well that ends well,” says a certain person

LOL!!!

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

.
.
From Houdini/Geller to Mossad. From entertainment to assassination. Misdirection and deception - itz the Tribal way.
Hang in there, James, You're giving us a peak behind the curtain.

Rick

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Anonymous said...

Maybe St. Nilus will finally return now that no one will refer to his mudshark sister, or his sexuality.
23 March 2014 17:37


And ...

Anonymous said...

Although there has been some disruption over the past week, I think it worked out in the end. That loser St. Nilus has been successfully purged from the comment section; all's well that ends well.
24 March 2014 00:39


My, my, my. St Nilus really chapped your much-reduced prepuce ... didn't he?
Nothing gets the blood -- and the damage control squad -- moving like the constant revelation of the Bugger Boy Corporation's real agenda.

Nog, Nose 'n Knobgobbler.

Have no fear, Laddie. He'll be back, just as sure as God made little apples.

Rather like you. Jews, like rust, never sleep.

UN
.

James said...

How America Went Gay

Certain persons will refute this and trundle out their worn old signs saying "HARDWIRED FROM BIRTH" and "CURING IS EVIL", but people who actually get their info from clinical practice know better.

[n.b. We are talking about clinicians who care for their patients here, not the certain persons who damage them to make money.]

James said...

Ex-prostituted women blast UN and Amnesty International for trying to legalize prostitution

NEW YORK, March 21, 2014 (C-FAM.org) - Women rescued from prostitution are criticizing UN agencies and Amnesty International for trying to legalize prostitution insisting legalization would lead to more girls being trafficked, and transform pimps into legitimate businessmen.

“When [UN personnel] work in a brothel then will I listen to their argument,” said one former prostituted woman referring to the newly-created agency called UN Women.


You know that certain people run Amnesty International and that certain other people are not worth helping, don't you?

Does Amnesty ever mention political prisoners in the west who end up in prison for questioning feminism, or offending certain people, perhaps even for giving certain people Christmas cards?

Jameses II said...

Certain people wondered why DiCaprio didn't win an Oscar for Wolf of Wall Street.

Maybe the answer's here somewhere...

http://henrymakow.com/2014/01/the-jew-of-wall-street.html

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Off topic ... but interesting.

Especially to us. A very, very basic primer on Denial of Service attacks

http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2014/03/dos-ddos-addos-dummies/

Remember ... a weapon is usually a legitimate tool used inappropriately.

UN
.

James said...

Gloria Steinem was funded by the CIA. PROVEN!

No it wasn't.--Certain foolish people

James said...

How soviet propaganda works.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqpHTyt8psM

Certain commenters who shall remain unnamed at this point on this blog will say that such things don't exist, but we don't listen to silly people like that anymore.

James said...

So what's driving everyone nuts then?

Too much bullshit in the media?
Annoying immigrants?
Or just psychiatry itself?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOScYBwMyAA

Everyone's taking pills and going to shrinks, but they are madder than ever.

If it keeps up at this rate, there will eventually only be one sane person on the planet!

It'll be me! It'll be me! You are all crazy!.--The unmentionable one

James said...

The psych profession is a powerful weapon.

In Soviet Russia they would tape your eyes open and put you under hot lights and scream at you to sign a document asserting your agreement in Stalin's latest proclamation that 2+2 now equals 5.

If you resisted they would call you crazy and try to drive you nuts over days and days of mind torture.

When you finally had enough and signed the bloody thing to make it all go away, they would say "Mate, you must be crazy. 2+2=4, even kids know that!".

And then they'd lock you up.

Certain people would just love to define racism and dislike of immigrants as a mental illness and start prescribing the zombie-pills.

They are trying.

No, they aren't.--Anonymous

James said...

BTW, the vid I just linked to about psychiatry is very, very good.

I recommend everyone watch it.

Shrinks are fakes, and are used as courtroom weapons.

James said...

If you are in the US it is a good idea to make sure that your health insurance doesn't include psychiatric treatment.

Why?

Because if you have mental health coverage, you will end up staying in the loony bin longer. If you don't have insurance, they seem to be able to "cure" you quite a bit faster.

So, what happened? They made such cover mandatory of course...

It's enough to drive us nuts.

James said...

Once they start rounding up crazies, who's going to be crazy enough to object?

Its the perfect system.

James said...

So why are so many people in prison in the US?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw_UlUGoUV4

Plea-bargains.

katana said...

Nick Griffin continues his recent straight talk at the European Congress in Kirchheim, Thuringia, Saturday, March 22, 2014. This time on the Ukraine situation and the gay agenda.

Germany: Ukrainian nationalists are being used by the EU - Nick Griffin
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6Ir2rWzkFk]


Here’s the transcript of his interview:

Nick Griffin: [loud background noise] ... it’s by Globalists, Zionists, the European Union, ... they are not in the least bit interested in Ukrainian freedom. They are interested in using Ukrainian nationalism as a way of attacking Russia, of provoking Russia, so that they continue with the Project for a New American Century [PNAC] campaign to hem Russia in to destroy Russia. Particularly to destroy Putin.

[loud background noise]

When a group of nationalists start saying, “We want to be part of the European Union, we ought to be part of NATO”, they cease in my eyes to be nationalists. They cross the red line and they are in the wrong. I wouldn’t want to fight them, but I would urge them to wake and smell the coffee. And understand that NATO and the EU aren’t interested in protecting the rights of Ukraine. They want to loot the Ukraine. They want the oligarchs to be allowed to loot the Ukraine, and they want to use it as a stepping stone to attack Russia.

... by all means campaign for a truly independent Ukraine which isn’t dominated by either Wall Street, and the Western banks and Brussels, ... or Moscow, fair enough. But don’t be used as a tool for American imperialism, which is what we are in now.

... the nationalist principle is self determination. The people of Crimea has spoken, it’s clear what they want. They want to go back to mother Russia and I support that right.

[loud background noise]

Same sex marriage isn’t about [the] rights of gay people. It’s fundamentally an attack by a Trotskyite, leftist and capitalist elite which want the “pink pound” and the “pink dollar”. It’s an attack on marriage; its an attack on tradition; it’s an attack on the fabric of our society ...

[loud background noise]

... teach them about homosexuality? That’s not, anything about the rights of homosexuals. That’s about some dirty pervert trying to mess with the minds of my kids. And I think it’s great, that finally, a major European power has stood up and said, “Leave our kids alone!”

-----------------------

Uncle Nasty said...

.
I thought this was a worthwhile and valuable post that, sort of, got lost.

Well, I would think that, wouldn't I? I was the one who posted it.
Anyway, here it is again.
Seriously, I think this is very, very valuable:-

Uncle Nasty said...
.
This is useful.

Exremely useful.

View it. Copy it. Download it. Distribute it but above all, if you can ... keep it.

http://mk.christogenea.org/content/premature-holocausts-reports-six-million-jews-1915-1938

I hope to be using it next weekend.

UN
.
23 March 2014 01:39


UN ... again.
.

Rogue said...

Hello, I'm not Nastiest, just his 3rd cousin 17 times removed.

Here's my opinion on the world ...

Obama is wonderful, Putin is a thug, the Jews are only ever disliked for wrong reasons, Mandela was the greatest man who ever lived, global warming is proved beyond doubt, the EU has prevented WW3, gays are wonderful, gay-criticizers are horrible, Miss World should be MR World, the USA and UK are extremely wise when it comes to foreign wars/intervention, Hollywood is talented, most musicians aren't twats, the Western youth of today are extremely wise and are not victims of systemic propaganda, multiculturalism rocks, immigration rocks, mixed relationships are right and good (and rock) and, lastly, gouda tastes better than cheddar.

Beyond that, there is nothing, of course.

Except that.

Anonymous said...

Dear Sir,

I'd like to offer you the job of Chairman of the BBC.

SAVANT said...

Ok, time to react to your reactions:

I still think you should go back to moderating all the comments

I will be moderating all comments but not by way of pre-moderation. The interaction flows much better when comments are real-time.


If your beliefs don't stand up to scrutiny, then don't get upset with someone who comes along and proves your beliefs wrong.

I've responded to similar points many times in the past. I do NOT object to contrary opinions. The problem with the NU thing was that it was destroying any semblance of rational discourse and ruining the comment section.

Are we allowed to mention the unmentionable one if we think he's back?

No, no and NO again. Things will revert back to exactly the same position were we to do that. James, you write well and provide interesting links. Why don't you stick to that and pass on this NU dialogue thing? It was fine for a while but ended up driving me and everyone else nuts.

That loser St. Nilus has been successfully purged from the comment section

No he has not. I think he's in the process of emigrating to NZ and that might explain his absence.

Has the blog some issues ? Double-posts when we publish ?

This is a 'feature' of B logger

katana said...

posted by SAVANT at 09:44 on 23-Mar-2014

But of late NU is being brought back in, either directly or indirectly, attracting responses from what appears to be NU himself under various noms de guerre. With the same result..... the threads are becoming a mess. I'm not going back to pre-approving comments but what I will do is delete each reference to His Nastyship and reserve the right to ban any persistent offender.
------------------------

Well done Savant! I never wavered in my faith that you would eventually pull through. Although at times, I must admit, I did cast my eyes to what looked like greener pastures just in case this blog continued on a trajectory that would end up it resembling a field straight out of the 1930s dust bowls from The Grapes of Wrath fame.

As we have seen, even a single saboteur (sorry YKW, I don't know the word in yiddish) can wreck havoc when left to freely act at will, inciting discord and destruction through comment after comment, month after month. All awhile gleefully rubbing their filthy hands together between tapping away at the keyboard with their claw-like long fingernails.

When confronted with these moral conundrums, such as; to ban or to not to ban; to delete or not to delete, one should always look, as Savant appears to have done, to our lord and saviour and ask ourselves, in this situation, "What would Hitler, do?"

I'll end by quoting someone. "For what does a blogger profit if he stores up treasures in cyberspace, yet lets his earthly blog be overrun by hasbarats?", ... or something like that.

Anonymous said...

"Fiona Bruce has a lovely bottom" Jeremy Clarkson

Claudia Winkleman
Victoria Coren
Jo Coburn
Emily Matliss

"The BBC is hideously white" Greg Dyke

James said...

"The BBC is hideously white" Greg Dyke

Too many ashkenazis?
They should use more Sephardic jews. They are browner.

Jimmy said...

The Talmud.

http://henrymakow.com/2014/03/Does-Talmud-Teach-Bestiality-Pedophilia-Incest.html

Always a popular topic on the internet.

Anonymous said...

Ashkenazis can sometimes be very brown and semitic. Eg 2 BBC darlings - David Baddiel and Ed Milliband.

Anonymous said...

@katana 12:05

"to our lord and saviour and ask ourselves, in this situation, "What would Hitler, do?""

You are suggesting that Savant destroys his country and submits his people to mass death, rape and misery.
I would prefer it if Savant didn't do that.

Anonymous said...

A new add for coca cola that was run for super bowl here was diversity groups singing america the beautiful in their own language and with pop ups of dad being white mom a nigger,two fag dads with their adopted kid who will probably turm out to be a sausage sucker to,the list goes on.Cheerios which i will boycott has a better one of the jig daddy and his white wife in the kitchen talking about a new baby but the 5 yr old zebra daughter wants a puppy in stead.time to vomit folks..its being forced fed to make it acceptable but not to the majoroty i have talked to.jew bull shit for the goyim...

Gem Junior said...

Alleluia, Praise His Holy Name! Oho, Swing Low, Sweeeeeet Chariot, comin' fo' to carry him finally da hell outta here at long last Lord. Lawdy lawd.

Seriously, what an annoying nightmare. How much longer could it go on? I'm so happy you took control, after all it is yours (even if you are pretty democratic (not to insult you or anything) and the schmucks were really ruining it. Halleluia.

Charles said...

Just admit that you are a Boas acolyte and MOT.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Boas


Sav, no matter how much the MOT refines the message he's still a murderous hostile.

Dan said...

Hey Sav,

How's that ban on personal slanging matches working out for ya? MOT here is cranking up his specious routine again.

How is it that Houdini like he slips through the comment filter? Every fucking time?

Anonymous said...

The first time Savant put the kibosh on the disrupting yid, the comment section vastly improved almost immediately with old posters returning for a short spell.

But, the meddling yid slipped through the cracks, once again ... thus mudding the waters, as per his agenda.

So, Savant has made another attempt at cleaning up this section, and some posters ("James", amongst others) can't resist slipping "The unmentionable one" or "other persons".

This ain't my Blog, nor yours ... so try having a little respect for Savant, if not for the other posters here. How many times do we have to say again and again ... ENOUGH ALREADY, dammit!!

Anonymous said...

LMAO!! St. Nilus isn't emigrating anywhere, that's funny.
He is a loser that works as an orderly in an old folks home. He cleans up after them when they deficate or urinate on themselves.
Aside from having no money, or marketable skills to move, he is right at home in Brighton with all the other poofs.
Nice try, but he was run off this blog, he's not in the process of moving.

Rogue said...

Whatever, Mr anon 22:34 (or Nastiest?)

St Nilus stuff about Jewish and queer domination of popular culture in the UK DOES serve a purpose.

This is the kind of shit we ordinary gentiles really DO need to know.

I personally have nothing against JOOS per se (I judge every individual as an individual, be they White, Wog or Weinstein), but a small shadowy minority, having influence beyond reasonable measure, is something WE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT!

So go crow somewhere else.

Dan said...

It stinks to high heaven.

Anonymous said...

Thank You!

Lady Frog said...

Anonymous 22:34 : " he is right at home in Brighton with all the other poofs "

What is a poof ? It looks funny but I don't find it in my translator .

" he was run off this blog , not in the process of moving ."
He is so run off this blog that he posts right now under various surnames such as F.Galton , and countless others I don't remember .

Oh and I see that James the Kook ( another funny term I learnt from another blog ) actually triumphs When he should have felt " le souffle du couperet " .
Its hilarious .

Denise said...

Thank GOD! You blog is too good to go down under a sustained assault be the Subverters.

All you need to do, by the by, is block the IP addy. I do not promote my site. I'm too busy in 3D world to write consistently. I have had a few attempts at subversion. A female pal is getting trolled by NASTY Anti Fa. Anti fa I know.

She's made her blog private.

Me? I tracked down the IP addresses, and then the home addresses of the trangressors, and let them know that I know where they live. I thoroughly spooked one loser; I know what he looks like - and he doesn't know what I look like - and maybe I'm crazy, in real life. I described his STREET to him.

The little bitch vanished after that. But I still know his house, and where he goes on weekends.

Blocking the IP addy works just fine, though, in most cases.

Denise said...

Rogue - if you don't loathe Kikes, down to the marrow of your being, you simply don't know enough about Kikes.

They are a Race of DEVILS. They all need to go back to their Unholy Father. Win win. They'll be happy where they belong, and Humanity is now free to be Human.

Anonymous said...

Poofter is a derogatory word for a homosexual.

Anonymous said...

A 'poof' is short for 'poofter', which means a homosexual.

Rogue said...

@Denise 04:44

No, I stand by what I said before - we all generalise when it comes to different groups or nationalities.

But when it comes to individuals, I treat them as individuals, be they good, bad or otherwise.

Apart from that, maybe your utter loathing of Jews has skewed your point of view somewhat.

Dan said...

Rogue,

Do not argue with Denise. She is the kapo di Kapo of anti-semitism.

Denise said...

Rogue - judging Jews as individuals only gets you persecuted, slandered, dispossessed. and genocided.

Study their real history

Dan - Thanks!!!!

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Dan said...

Rogue,

Do not argue with Denise.


Sorry Dan, but I had to howl at your use of "Kapo" ... When I think you meant "Capo" as in "Capo de tutti capo" -- The Godfather.

Read up on the "Kapos" however ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapo_(concentration_camp)

Wanna guess as to the ... ah, race of almost all of the worst of the Kapos?

A very very well kept secret, that.

UN
.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Back to the Kapos ...

Prosecution of kapos[edit]

The Israeli Nazi and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law of 1950, most famously used to prosecute Adolf Eichmann in 1961 and Ivan Demjanjuk in 1986, was originally introduced with the principal purpose of prosecuting Jewish collaborators with the Nazis.[25][26] Between 1951 and 1964, approximately 40 trials were held, mostly of people alleged to have been kapos.[26] Fifteen are known to have resulted in convictions, but only sketchy details are available since the records were sealed in 1995 for a period of 70 years from the trial date.[26] One person was convicted of crimes against humanity, which carried a mandatory death penalty, but the sentence was commuted to imprisonment.[26]

Shittipedia


Read the article and have a closer look at the photographic example of a Kapo ... and voila!!

Fifteen are known to have resulted in convictions, but only sketchy details are available since the records were sealed in 1995 for a period of 70 years from the trial date.

Hmmmm.

UN
.

Dan said...

It's okay. I know Denise!