Thursday, 11 April 2013

Apostles of degradation

Well I suppose it had to happen. And I suppose it's the kind of thing that Willi Munzenberg, the inspiration for the Frankfurt School, had in mind when he enjoined his comrades we must to organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat

Or what former KGB boss Lavrenti Beria was thinking when he addressed a visiting delegation of American Communists. “Degradation and conquest are companions. By attacking the character and morals … by bringing about, through contamination of youth, a general degraded feeling, command of the populace is facilitated to a very marked degree. By perverting the institutions of a nation and bringing about a general degradation … a population can be brought psychologically to heel."

Pity both were prematurely offed by their erstwhile proletarian comrades because their instructions have been fulfilled to a degree beyond their wildest expectations as western society sinks to unthinkable levels of moral degradation and social disintegration.


Maybe you thought it couldn't get any worse? Well it can, and it will.What's the most vile perversion that you can imagine? Sex with cadavers, a la Jimmy Saville? Or with a animals? Or with your mother? Well to me sex with, make that rape of, children has to be by far the worst. If for no other reason than that the victims end up permanently damaged. Their lives are literally destroyed. Which is why it has been the ultimate taboo in most societies. But not all, mind you.

Now I have noticed a very definite trend emerging, following the classical Cultural Marxism progression. The CMs know that if you control the language you master the debate. That's why PC has been successful.  With this in mind I've noticed the same trend that we saw with homosexuality: the creeping reclassification of paedophilia as yet another form of 'diversity' and 'lifestyle choice'. You know the drill.

Paedophiles have now begun to seek a similar legal status as homosexuals, arguing that their sexual desire for children is just a natural “sexual orientation” that will soon be cool as well. Call someone a dirty pervert? That's HATE speech and must be banned.

So far so bad. But just as the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder in the mid seventies, the same lovely people have now deemed the term paedophile to be, you've guessed it, 'offensive'. We must now refer to these filthy perverts as 'minor-attracted individuals'. I kid you not.  We can confidently expect those who don't go along with this reclassification ti be dismissed as Nazis and paedophobes. The same people also issued a report that claimed “the negative potential of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”

Meanwhile one Jackie Speiers is introducing a bill in California which defines paedophilia as a 'sexual orientation' that should not require remedial counselling. 

 And that fountainhead of all that ails us, university ‘humanities’ departments, are riding (so to speak) to the rescue. Of the paedophiles, of course. Dr. Milton Diamond (you'll be amazed to learn that he's Jewish)  of the University of Hawaii has, as part of his work, come up with a comprehensive taxonomy of ‘sexual rights’.  Yes, that ‘rights’ word again.  

Among those ‘rights’ is that nobody should be ‘disadvantaged’ because of age. Right, I’m sure your average seven year-old just can’t wait to be sodomised by some fifty year-old pervert.  )Similar bromides have emerged from a number of Canadian Universities as well).

So yes, we are indeed being prepared for the normalising of the ultimate degradation. In due course it will be seen as cool to have an eight year-old girlfriend.  And of course marriage – and adoption - rights will inevitably follow. After all, only ‘haters’ could object to that.

Beria, Munzenberg and the other CMs, as they broil in the Seventh Circle of Hell, can derive some small comfort from the success of their handiwork. 


PS, here are some additional interesting links.

http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2013/04/09/the-paedofile-are-paedophilephiles-simply-daft-or-is-there-something-else-going-on/

http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2013/04/10/the-paedofile-did-david-cameron-refer-to-gay-smears-in-order-to-protect-tory-elm-house-paedophiles/

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100196502/guardian-paedophiles-are-ordinary-members-of-society-who-need-moral-support/

http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2007/09/18/german-govt-promoting-incest/ 

429 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 400 of 429   Newer›   Newest»
Dan said...

English women and men ought to be armed. For women it's the only equalizer.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 18:20

People want to read it, so they write about it.

nastiestuncle said...

@Dan 18:25

I'm not sure that arming the general public, in a country in which heavy drinking is part of the culture, would be a good idea. Just imagine the carnage at your local Wetherspoons.

However, having more weapons stored at shooting ranges would be a good thing. Everyone should learn how to shoot.

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim:“People want to read it (holocau$t/Nazi “stories”), so they write about it.”

HaHaHa!!!!

nastiestkushin, why aren’t people interested in the Holodomor or the Jewish mass murderers in the Soviet Union? Why aren’t they being told about the Holodomor, the Jewish mass murderers in the Soviet Union, the Transfer Agreement, the Morgenthau Plan, Judea declaring war on Germany (The Economic Boycott of 1933), Germany Must Perish, Zionism and the Third Reich, the Last Appeal to Reason' by Adolf Hitler etc etc?

Frank Galton

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 19.00

Because, my overly religious friend, people who obsess about Jews and make shit up about them are in the minority. The majority of Daily Mail readers are not Jewobsessionists like you.

Why not go and start your own newspaper. You can print shit about how steel doesn't lose its strength when hot and how Anne Frank's diary was written in Biro all day long. Come back when you are a major news corporation and I'll eat my hat.

Dan said...

Women ought to be able to carry a derringer. It would deter niggers.

Dan said...

It's an identity that ought to be exterminated either way.

Anonymous said...

http://www.guardian-series.co.uk/news/10308743.Row_over_Halal_meat_at_school/

Same paper carries an article about a pub changing into a mosque.
Paris Claims

nastiestuncle said...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1038774/Holocaust-hunger-The-truth-Stalins-Great-Famine.html

Oh, it's a Daily Mail article about the Holodomor.

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim said: “people who obsess about Jews and make shit up about them are in the minority.”

Where’s the made up “shit” about the Holodomor, the Transfer Agreement, the Morgenthau Plan, Judea declaring war on Germany (The Economic Boycott of 1933), Germany Must Perish, Zionism and the Third Reich, Hitler’s Last Appeal to Reason' etc etc? These are all FACTS.

So tell me nastiestkushim, why aren’t the goyim being told about these FACTS?

Also why are there no Hollywood films about the Jewish mass murderers in the former Soviet Union, torturing, raping and murdering tens of millions of white Christian Russians, Ukrainians etc. Hollywood could produce a blockbuster about Jewish mass murderers, in particular Genrikh Yagoda and Lazar Kaganovitch, who, between them, murdered at least 17 million Christians. Why does Hollywood refuse to make such films? Could it be that Hollywood is run by Jews?

Genrikh Yagoda (Russian Jew): The greatest mass murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. Yagoda was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the "bloodthirsty dwarf."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genrikh_Yagoda

Lazar Kaganovitch (Ukrainian Jew): Kaganovitch personally supervised the murder of 6-7 million Ukrainian peasants in the mid-1930's and went on to organize the mass murder of 2 million Muslims in the Caucasus and deportation of another 2 million to Siberia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazar_Kaganovich



Frank Galton

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 19:56

The production and distribution of halal or kosher food would be forbidden in this country if it was up to me.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 20:00

You see Jews in your cornflakes, you crazy mother fucker.

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim said: “Oh, it's a Daily Mail article about the Holodomor.”

HaHaHa!

One, five year old article article on the Holodomor (notice no mention of the Jew Kaganovitch), yet 25 articles in the Daily Mail re the Holocau$t/Nazis within the past THREE WEEKS!

Lazar Kaganovitch (Ukrainian Jew): Kaganovitch personally supervised the murder of 6-7 million Ukrainian peasants in the mid-1930's and went on to organize the mass murder of 2 million Muslims in the Caucasus and deportation of another 2 million to Siberia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazar_Kaganovich



Frank Galton

Dan said...

No, he notices the Jews who were in the Politburo. These people are studiously airbrushed out of the picture by western journalists and academics (themselves Jews).

Cereal is diabetes in a bowl btw. Don't eat corflakes, eat eggs and toast instead, perhaps a little slice of ham or bacon with it. Processed cereals are shit.

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim said: “you crazy mother fucker”

Notice how nastiestkushim refuses to answer the question and resorts to NAME CALLING?

HASBARA HANDBOOK (WJUS, 2002)
Seven Basic Propaganda Devices (Page 22)

NAME CALLING: Through the careful use of words, name calling links a person or an idea to a negative symbol. The most obvious example – “they’re a neo-Nazi group”. (Page 22)
http://www.middle-east-info.org/take/wujshasbara.pdf


I’ll ask you once again nastiestkushim: Where’s the made up “shit” about the Holodomor, the Transfer Agreement, the Morgenthau Plan, Judea declaring war on Germany (The Economic Boycott of 1933), Germany Must Perish, Zionism and the Third Reich, Hitler’s Last Appeal to Reason' etc etc? These are all FACTS.

So tell me nastiestkushim, why aren’t the goyim being told about these FACTS?


Frank Galton

jeff_71 said...

Google search:

holodomor site:dailymail.co.uk returns 17 results, only one (ONE!) of which actually mentions the word in the article as opposed to in the comments or discussion forum

holocaust site:dailymail.co.uk returns 61,300 results

holocaust nazi site:dailymail.co.uk returns 12,800 results

holocaust jewish site:dailymail.co.uk returns 9,260 results

holocaust jews site:dailymail.co.uk returns 1,770 results

Dan said...

What will the Daily Mail do when the last holocaust survivor is strangled by the last renegade camp guard?

The children of the survivors? Their children's children's children?

DN said...

Daily Mail Stalin Communist Terror.

Do they run any stories highlighting Kaganovich or Yagoda? Probably not.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 20:16

"Notice how nastiestkushim refuses to answer the question and resorts to NAME CALLING?"

Says the man who calls me "kushim". You dumb mother fucker.

"I’ll ask you once again nastiestkushim: Where’s the made up “shit” about the Holodomor, the Transfer Agreement, the Morgenthau Plan, Judea declaring war on Germany (The Economic Boycott of 1933), Germany Must Perish, Zionism and the Third Reich, Hitler’s Last Appeal to Reason' etc etc? These are all FACTS."

Let me guess. You think they are all Jewish things when they are not?

Holodomor for example = not a Jewish thing. It was a communist thing.
Judea declared war on Germany: never happened.
And so on.

That's why we refer to Nazi Germany as Nazi Germany because we don't think that the Nazis did what they did because they were German; it was because they were Nazis.

You see Jews in your eggs and toast with a slice of bacon.

Dan said...

Kaganovich comes up once. Not sure if it was in article or in comments though.

nastiestuncle said...

Apparently, the Daily Mail has a responsibility to tell the public about the things which anonymous above wants them to know about.

It's not there to make money for its employees, owners and shareholders. It's there to be a national socialist mouthpiece.

Haha.

Dan said...

Kaganovich 1

Eichmann 67

That's the Daily Mail for you.

Dan said...

The various things the communists did had individual administrators responsible for
Carrying out policy.

Eichmann Killed fewer, was more junior and worked for a shorter period, than Kaganovich yet the DM (name a paper) has a ratio of 1/67 articles that mention either name.

It's amazing.

Anonymous said...

Rape Ape Apeipo Joji also committed such an offence as a 17 year old youth I guess the press were so caught up on Obama's thug son getting his just desserts to notice.

Dan said...

Kaganovich is clearly the biggest killer in the twentieth century and he gt's mentioned once by the Daily Mail. Isn't that a dereliction of duty to report and investigate the facts?

Anonymous said...

Calling you “nastiestkushim” is not name calling – it’s a term of endearment, my little Juden hasbarat.

nastiestkushim: “Judea declared war on Germany: never happened.”

HaHaHa!!!

The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html

The Economic Boycott of 1933

An International Jewish Boycott Conference was held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing boycott campaign. It was held under the auspices of the self-styled World Jewish Economic Federation, of which famous New York City attorney and long-time political power broker, Samuel Untermyer, was elected president.

Upon returning to the United States in the wake of the conference, Untermyer delivered a speech over WABC Radio (New York), a transcript of which was printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933.

Samuel Untermyer:

“...Germany has been converted from a nation of culture into a veritable hell of cruel and savage beasts.”

LOL!!!

“We owe it not only to our persecuted brethren but to the entire world to now strike in self-defence a blow that will free humanity....”

LOL!!!

“Now or never must all the nations of the earth make common cause against the... slaughter, starvation and annihilation... fiendish torture, cruelty and persecution that are being inflicted day by day upon these men, women and children...

Untermyer concluded his largely fantastic and hysterical address by declaring that with the support of "Christian friends... we will drive the last nail in the coffin of bigotry and fanaticism...."

LOL!!!

Wonder where we’ve heard this bullshit nonsense before? Iraq, Iran etc

Anyway, I’ll ask you once more nastiestkushim: Where’s the made up “shit” about the Holodomor (Jew Kaganovitch), the Transfer Agreement, Judea declaring war on Germany (The Economic Boycott of 1933), the Morgenthau Plan, Germany Must Perish, Zionism and the Third Reich, Hitler’s Last Appeal to Reason' etc etc? These are all FACTS."

Also why are there no Hollywood films about the Jewish mass murderers in the former Soviet Union, torturing, raping and murdering tens of millions of white Christian Russians, Ukrainians etc. Hollywood could produce a blockbuster about Jewish mass murderers, in particular Genrikh Yagoda and Lazar Kaganovitch, who, between them, murdered at least 17 million Christians. Why does Hollywood refuse to make such films? Could it be that Hollywood is run by Jews?

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

The sayan known as 'nastiestuncle' wrote:

Holodomor for example = not a Jewish thing. It was a communist thing.

Judea declared war on Germany: never happened.

It's just great when he does this because you know that he's inviting us to show him as a liar. Anyway, I just couldn't resist:

http://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/Controversybook_eng_32.htm

- At the time, the facts were available. The British Government's White Paper of 1919 (Russia, No. 1, a Collection of Reports on Bolshevism) quoted the report sent to Mr. Balfour in London in 1918 by the Netherlands Minister at Saint Petersburg, M. Oudendyke: “Bolshevism is organized and worked by Jews, who have no nationality and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.” The United States Ambassador, Mr. David R. Francis, reported similarly: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.” M. Oudendyke's report was deleted from later editions of the British official publication and all such authentic documents of that period are now difficult to obtain. Fortunately for the student, one witness preserved the official record.

This was Mr. Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times, who experienced the Bolshevik revolution. The French edition of his book included the official Bolshevik lists of the membership of the ruling revolutionary bodies (they were omitted from the English edition). -



These records show that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprized 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People's Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others. The Moscow Che-ka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918-1919, were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly “Socialist” or other non-Communist parties (during that early period the semblance of “opposition” was permitted, to beguile the masses, accustomed under the Czar to opposition parties) were 55 Jews and 6 others. All the names are given in the original documents reproduced by Mr. Wilton. (In parentheses, the composition of the two short-lived Bolshevik governments outside Russia in 1918-1919, namely those of Hungary and Bavaria, was similar).

Communism is a jewish thing - so there!

Allan@Aberdeen

shlomo hymie zogowitz jewstein said...

But according to Wiki, the Times called Douglas Reed an anti-Semite (even though he used to work for them), so that settles it.

Anonymous said...

“This movement among the Jews is not new.

From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.

It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution.

It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews.” – Winston Churchill

Frank Galton

Uncle Nasty said...

.
nastiestkushim, what’s your opinion re this constant Holocau$t/Nazi propaganda?

Frank Galton
12 April 2013 18:20


If i may, Frank ... please do not feed the dipshit. Having said that, my opinion the newest, relentless kosher propaganda war is that the tribe is becoming nervous.

My parent's generation and all those before them used "Cherchez le Juif" as a catchprase. My Dad's elder brother married one of the most delightfully vulgar women imaginable. What, I have learned, the New Zealanders refer to as "Hard Case" ... that is to say possessed of a rough, dry and cynical point-of-view -- with sense of humour to match.

(Yes, it is a feminist and feminised society, but not when you get into the rural areas. Once there, it's like the old Free State).

Anyhoo ... back to my old Aunt Ellen, who with my Dad's three sisters would have a real rip-snorter on Christmas and New year's days discussing their bosses or co-workers.

It was only at about the age of twelve that I discovered that the correct and polite term was not "Bloody jew bastards" or "Bloody Yids."

Anyway, I recall the sixties, onwards being the era of the "Boo-hoo joo" when all the noses kvetched and whined about the hard deal they'd got -- which was happily countered by more concentration camp kike jokes than you could shake a stick at.

"Tomorrow iss schports day. Ze english vill play cricket on ze cricket fields, ze yanks will play baseball on ze baseball fields and ze choos will play hopscotch on zer minefields."

Oh, days filled with innocent laughter.

Anyhoo, the campaign really got underway in the late seventies and went like a train until, oddly enough, very recently. Ordinary politically correct websites all over the world are now putting up -- and keeping up some very un-PC comments ...

An example: Google "Why does everyone hate jews?"

3,380,000 hits. The sixth one?

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_do_so_many_people_seem_to_hate_Jews_and_Israel

Read it. I think the world is becoming jewed out, the worm is turning, and Der Ewige Jude is currying his combinations, because he's given us his best shot ...

and it's not working.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

UN

Just Googled "Why does everyone hate jews?" and it shows 13,500,000 (Thirteen and a half million) hits.

It’s no wonder the likes of nastiestkushim trawl through internet 24/7. They’re panicking.

Frank Galton

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 21:13

Well, unlike you, I did a bit of research into the numbers of Jews in the Bolshevik party, and found that your numbers are completely wrong.

What first made me suspicious was that you wrote it, and you're in a "boy cried wolf" situation because you lie all the time, knowingly or not.
Then, I noticed that your figures only exist on anti-semitic websites. What a surprise.

It's turns out that they are completely wrong.

For example, you say that in The Council of People's Commissars there were 17 Jews. Whereas the real figure was 5.

I told you before: you're just too religious. You'll believe any old shit as long as it fits into your beliefs.

Watch out you don't dream about Jews tonight.

Anonymous said...

340,000,000 hits for "why does everyone hate christians?" I can't be bothered to try muslims, hindus coons etc
Paris Claims

nastiestuncle said...

@Uncle Nasty 21:35

"If i may, Frank ... please do not feed the dipshit."

Translation: nastiestuncle will own you every time.

I thank you.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said (12 April 2013 20:47): “Rape Ape Apeipo Joji also committed such an offence as a 17 year old youth I guess the press were so caught up on Obama's thug son getting his just desserts to notice.

I see anonymous (nastiestkushim) is trying to divert the discussion away from the Holodomor, Jewish mass murderers etc to the “rape ape”.

LOL!

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim: “Translation: nastiestuncle will own you every time.”

Just answer the questions nastiestkushim.

Where’s the made up “shit” about the Holodomor (Jew Kaganovitch), the Transfer Agreement, Judea declaring war on Germany (The Economic Boycott of 1933), the Morgenthau Plan, Germany Must Perish, Zionism and the Third Reich, Hitler’s Last Appeal to Reason' etc etc? These are all FACTS."

Also why are there no Hollywood films about the Jewish mass murderers in the former Soviet Union, torturing, raping and murdering tens of millions of white Christian Russians, Ukrainians etc. Hollywood could produce a blockbuster about Jewish mass murderers, in particular Genrikh Yagoda and Lazar Kaganovitch, who, between them, murdered at least 17 million Christians. Why does Hollywood refuse to make such films? Could it be that Hollywood is run by Jews?

Do Jews control Hollywood? What’s your opinion nastiestkashim?

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

Q: Why are Jews in favor of amnesty for illegal aliens?
A: Because so many illegals are named Jaime.

Keiser said...

He was surrounded by Goyim

What's a Kohen to do?

shlomo hymie zogowitz jewstein said...

Anonymous said...

Also why are there no Hollywood films about the Jewish mass murderers in the former Soviet Union, torturing, raping and murdering tens of millions of white Christian Russians, Ukrainians etc. Hollywood could produce a blockbuster about Jewish mass murderers, in particular Genrikh Yagoda and Lazar Kaganovitch, who, between them, murdered at least 17 million Christians. Why does Hollywood refuse to make such films? Could it be that Hollywood is run by Jews?


People don't want to see films about Christians. People want to see films about Jews. Hollywood is just giving the people what they want because Hollywood is all about making money.

This also explains why the Hollywood studios wouldn't touch that Mel Gibson film about Jesus. Nobody was ever going to go and see that one.

nastiesuncle is a true white patriot and he pwns all you rotten goyim!

Anonymous said...

Nastiestsayanliar wrote:

- Well, unlike you, I did a bit of research into the numbers of Jews in the Bolshevik party, and found that your numbers are completely wrong.

For example, you say that in The Council of People's Commissars there were 17 Jews. Whereas the real figure was 5. -

Show me the references. You never provide references, Show me your 'research'.

I did some research. here is "Judea declares war on Germany" on the front page of The Daily Express of 24th March 1933.

http://www.biblestudysite.com/judeawar.htm

Allan@Aberdeen

Heardnebba said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 21:58

Made up shit: that these were Jewish things, or were things they were not.

"Also why are there no Hollywood films about the Jewish mass murderers in the former Soviet Union, torturing, raping and murdering tens of millions of white Christian Russians, Ukrainians etc."

You mean, a fantasy film. Why not write to them and ask.

"Could it be that Hollywood is run by Jews?"

Well they are over represented. It isn't run by Jews though.

Anonymous said...

nastiestziofraud writes:

- Well they are over represented. It isn't run by Jews though -

LIAR

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19

- Only 22% of Americans now believe "the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews," down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.But I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.-

Allan@Aberdeen

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Keiser said...

He was surrounded by Goyim

What's a Kohen to do?
12 April 2013 22:19


Thanks for that really weird post, Frank. As is so often the case, while reading about the shrink-wrapped (For your protection!!!) hosenose, my eye was inexorably pulled to this link:-

http://tinyurl.com/cw7wa99

In which another race-mixed weirdo decided to chlorinate himself out of the gene pool.

One has to wonder if, halfway through the deed, he (metaphorically, of course) stopped to think to himself: "Maybe I haven't thought this all the way through ..?"

Guess we'll never know.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim,

You still haven’t answered the question, DUMBO!

Where’s the made up “shit” about the Holodomor (Jew Kaganovitch), the Transfer Agreement, Judea declaring war on Germany (The Economic Boycott of 1933), the Morgenthau Plan, Germany Must Perish, Zionism and the Third Reich, Hitler’s Last Appeal to Reason' etc etc?

nastiestkushim: “You mean, a fantasy film.”

Are the mass murders of tens of millions of white Christians by the Jews Genrikh Yagoda and Lazar Kaganovitch just a fantasy to you?

nastiestkushim: It (Hollywood) isn't run by Jews though.

HaHaHa!!! Tell that to Joel Stein.

Joel Stein: “Jews totally run Hollywood... as a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood.”
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column


Frank Galton

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Comment deleted

This comment has been removed by the author.
12 April 2013 22:58


Tell me you don't find this interesting. We have had this event (self-deleted comments) quite often over the last few weeks.

Now the first thought that pops into my head is that we have no problem insulting the shit out of one another ... so why would someone get shy enough to actually withdraw comments?

Just askin'

UN
.

perry said...

There are loads of kosher conservatives and "conservative" jews out there. If they have ever tried to stop the immigration invasion of the West, it is self-evident they have not succeeded. If it is so-called "national socialists"* (whom nastiestuncle assures us are "losers") who have thwarted their efforts to defeat "the Left", then it does not say much for their efforts, does it?

So why does nastiestuncle spend so much time on this blog when he should be telling kosher conservatives to up their game? He reminds me a bit of those liberals who expend huge amounts of energy trying to convince "racists" that they are destined to lose.

Of course, if nastiestuncle did find some kosher conservatives to play with, he'd have nothing to say to them regarding political analysis or plans for action - it would just be more whining about "anti-semitism" and "nazis".

As far as I'm concerned, he has served his purpose here. If ever I want to show someone an example of a lying jewish troll in action, I can point them to the archives of this blog and to nastiestuncle's pathetic dissimulating.

* "national socialist" = nastiestuncle speak for anyone who recognizes the jewish problem

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 22:52

"Show me the references. You never provide references, Show me your 'research'."

I want you lot to get into the habit of doing your own research. It took me half an hour of searching, so you go and do the same.

As for "biblestudysite.com", nigga, please.
Plus, it uses a scan of the front page of the Daily Express. Well, you guise don't believe the MSM because it's run by Jews apparently. This excludes you form being able to use newspapers as sources.
Plus, a newspaper using the explosive headline "Judea declares war on Germany2 doesn't mean that Judea declares war on Germany.


Stop being so religious you gullible freak.


Uncle Nasty said...

.
While we're at it, Savant. I notice that irrelevant comment -- and the equally irrelevant replies thereto -- often boosts the latest threads to 300+ posts.

This I should point out is an old hasbara trick (diversion #15 to be exact) to render a damaging or potentially dangerous post top-heavy, and therefore too unwieldy to navigate -- thereby effectively shutting it down ... not to mention the old tactic of off-topic flaming -- steering the topic into safer (for joos that is) waters.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

"Judea declares war on Germany2 doesn't mean that Judea declares war on Germany.

No it means Judea declares war on Germany2 the sequel to the much inferior Judea declares war on Germany.

nastiestuncle said...

@perry 23:35

"So why does nastiestuncle spend so much time on this blog when he should be telling kosher conservatives to up their game?"

There is no "game" to be upped. As respectable as an anti-immigration movement can ever be, it is going to be hamstrung by the existence of national socialist types who are such a joke as to destroy any chance whatsoever of success.

"He reminds me a bit of those liberals who expend huge amounts of energy trying to convince "racists" that they are destined to lose."

"Racists" have lost though.

"As far as I'm concerned, he has served his purpose here. If ever I want to show someone an example of a lying jewish troll in action, I can point them to the archives of this blog and to nastiestuncle's pathetic dissimulating."

My nigger. I'm not Jewish, so go away and do some thinking. Whatever mental process you went through to deduce that I'm Jewish, you need to purge from your system.

nastiestuncle said...

@Uncle Nasty 23:34

It's a Jewish conspiracy.

Naa, it's not. Keiser has been known to delete his posts before.

James said...

Women ought to be able to carry a derringer. It would deter niggers.

True. True.

Anonymous said...

'nastiestlyingyidscumbag' refuses to provide links to his 'research'. He is a fraud and a liar as his posts make clear. Here is 'Judea declares war on Germany' once again, this time with commentary:

http://thebilzerianreport.com/who-really-started-world-war-ii/

- The Nazi government’s first official act against the Jews in Germany was its decision to initiate a one-day boycott of Jewish businesses on April 1, 1933 in response to the Jewish economic boycott, not vice versa. In reality, the Jewish economic boycott was a far greater threat to the German people than the one-day German boycott of Jewish goods. Judea’s boycott came at a time when the German economy was in dire straights. Many Germans were on the brink of starvation with 30% of the population unemployed. Judea’s boycott of German goods was an existential threat to the nation because the world’s Jewish population possessed the resources and political influence to make good on their word. -

Allan@Aberdeen

James said...

@Everyone,

Sorry guys for polluting the thread with nastiest uncle crap yesterday.

I just wanted to probe his mind and see how he ticks.

My honest opinion...? I'm actually frightened by him. Without one word of a lie, I had trouble sleeping after interacting deeper that usual with him like that, I think its scary that there are people like him out in the world. They are the ones that have the motivation to get power over others, and the strength of convictions to inflict their will on their targets without any sense of empathy.

That's my honest feeling, not sure if anyone else gets that vibe.

I wouldn't want my kids under his influence, and as for the Stop Harming Our Kids "Resolution", which NU calls a "Bill", that is a very sinister piece of paper indeed. So sinister, that it is not even legislation, it is simply the thin end of a very dangerous wedge. Exactly who does "Our" refer to in the SHOK resolution?
NOT the parents it seems, because NU doesn't have an issue with the particular wording, does he.

In conclusion, I think there definitely is some sinister force at work in the intellectual and spiritual sphere of our civilisation, and its agents are the likes of NU. Scary stuff really, once you truly gaze into the abyss...

Anonymous said...

Keiser said: “What's a Kohen to do?”

Orthodox Jewish man photographed covering himself in plastic bag
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2307713/Pictured-Orthodox-Jewish-man-covers-PLASTIC-BAG-flight.html#ixzz2QI6nmdYV

That’s nastiestkushim making a quick getaway.

I wonder if those plastic bags are heat resistant? If the Holocau$t were true, then just think of the billions of Deutsche Marks Adolf could have saved on his gas/coal bill? He could have just used the boil-in-the-bag (similar to cooking Pot Noodles) method/solution instead.

Just think of the billions of Deutsche Marks the Germans could have made selling Pot Jewdles to the masses.

Frank Galton

James said...

@NU

My nigger.

He is not your nigger.

James said...

@Frank Galton
Uncle Shlomo said: “Oy vey what is this already?! It's the James /Nastiest Uncle show and you don't get much more kosher than that!”

Notice how James tried to claim that Affirmative Action was introduced to, quote “stop universities becoming 99% JEWISH.”

LOL!!!!

James said (10 April 2013 19:41): “Remember, affirmative action began as an effort to stop universities becoming 99% Jewish.”
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2147334142609503958&postID=9087362877487599108

Frank Galton


It actually was. Affirmative action started in the 1920s in the USA. I bet you didn't know that.

I'd add that Jews didn't really have to much of a problem with that. They didn't want their kids to go to universities packed with Jewish nerds.

Maybe I'll just gullible, but I got this info from the book "The Affirmative Action Hoax" by Stephen Fallon. He was quite adamant that this in fact was the original implementation of AA in the USA.

Do you think that book is lying?

James said...


I’ll ask you once again nastiestkushim: Where’s the made up “shit” about the Holodomor, the Transfer Agreement, the Morgenthau Plan, Judea declaring war on Germany (The Economic Boycott of 1933), Germany Must Perish, Zionism and the Third Reich, Hitler’s Last Appeal to Reason' etc etc? These are all FACTS.

So tell me nastiestkushim, why aren’t the goyim being told about these FACTS?


Very fair questions.
Not even Henry Makow would print NU's ridiculous comments. He's incapable of assisting anyone on their journey to the truth. Instead he does whatever he does. It's kind of indescribable really.

James said...

I remember reading a story about a couple of blacks that raped their neighbour and then stuffed her vagina with caustic soda to get rid of their DNA.

It beggars belief that a "human" mind could conceive of such an act and then try to get away with it in such a clumsy and horrific way.

Still, I think NU's mind is even weirder than that.

James said...


"As for punishing parents that do it, I'm not so sure. If they did it because they were stupid and yielded to pressure from the doctor, then I think the doctor needs to be dealt with."

If a circumcision is absolutely necessary from a medical point of view then of course it should be allowed.


That's what I'd call really answering my question, boys and girls. Take note of the change of subject, the answering of a different question that was answered, and the final conclusion that he is right. Just marvellous!

Keiser said...

UN said...

"Now the first thought that pops into my head is that we have no problem insulting the shit out of one another ... so why would someone get shy enough to actually withdraw comments?"

NU said...

"Naa, it's not. Keiser has been known to delete his posts before."

True NU. I get trigger happy with the "Publish Your Comment" button sometimes, then realise I made a mistake (content, grammar or otherwise) and then redact my folly tout de suite. Irritating to be sure so I try to look before I leap now.

By the way the 12 April 2013 22:58 wasn't mine but perhaps the person had the answer to all the issues we struggle with here but just decided he didn't want to share that solution. Oh wait no here it is...

Get rid of all the perpetually dangerous and irritating Jewish Supremacists.

One more point remember that South Park episode "I'm a Little Bit Country, I'm a little bit rock and roll" where the town was divided in to pro-war and anti-war. The reveal at the end was that America needed this division for deniablilty. So even if some want war some want peace so the country can mitigate feeling of resentment towards it.

It's the same for the Jews. There will always be the brave few that speak out against Zionism. However if you took a group of 100% Rabid Zionists and put them in a "fresh" Country/Arena you would find a portion of them appear to be anti-Zionist. This percentage I suspect is always constant and not large.

You see the line is "I'm a little bit country and I'm a little bit rock and roll... so don't hate all of us just the bad war-mongering Zionist Jews".

For any new comers and those of you that haven't seen it I took this picture of NU while we were playing Starcraft II - Heart of the Swarm recently.

Nastiest Uncle

Keiser said...

@UN

"http://tinyurl.com/cw7wa99

In which another race-mixed weirdo decided to chlorinate himself out of the gene pool."


If it were that simple. It would seem from the article that our erstwhile stuntman left two Fatherless children, so sadly no he didn't "Darwin Award" himself. Those children will pick up the tab for his inadequacies.

James said...

Race mixed wierdos are a concern, but I wonder if we should be concerned with bigger things.

From CJ Bjerknes:

"I suspect the likely target of the first Chinese/Korean attack will be Japan. This will bring Japan into the Korean war and provide communist China with a pretext for an invasion of the islands.

Like the Imperial Japanese, the communist Chinese are threatening Hawaii. They also want the Philippines and Guam. It does the Chinese little good to take South Korea without also taking Japan. Japan is the perfect staging ground for American military forces and is more secure for America than South Korea given that the islands provide a sea buffer and American air power is strong. Taiwan is a bit of a wild card. Japan is very weak at the moment and is easily hit from North Korea.

What will Russia do if Japan is hit? Russians have no love for Japanese. The Chinese expect the American economy to fold if Japan and South Korea go to war. Why would Russia want China to control the seas? It is difficult to believe that the Russians would be eager for a world war, given the horrific losses they suffered in and as a result of the previous world wars. The Russians talk tough and are tough, but a world war, for what?

This is China and jewry's game. The Chinese need land. Only a world war can win them that if other nations clamp down on immigration. Jewry has always wanted a world war.

We can take them down together if we can take political power in the USA and make an alliance with the Russians."


http://jewishracism.blogspot.co.nz/2013/04/the-government-of-north-korea-confirms.html

James said...

Sorry forgot to mention that Bjerknes said that quote in 2006. It was a prediction that looks like it might be coming true.

Anonymous said...

I want you lot to

We already do our own research and nobody cares what you want.

Anonymous said...

How Affirmative Action Works

http://theodessafiles.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/nig_image76.jpg

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

How Affirmative Action Works (Except in Israel).

http://theodessafiles.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/nig_image76.jpg

Frank Galton

kulak said...

There will always be the brave few that speak out against Zionism.

Good point Keiser, and like I've always said, on entropy grounds alone.

Anonymous said...

Their children's children's children?

They've considerately started to tattoo themselves, which will save us some time.

(If you ask for a 76713 but they draw a 76731, you can sue for damages.)

James said...

Frank,

Funny.

Dunno if you believe the bit about AA being anti-jew at the start, but David Irving reckons his publisher wanted to know if he was a Jew because otherwise it would be harder to sell a book about Hitler, since most of the market for books was Jewish. i.e. only Jews bothered to read the damned things.
There might be some truth in that. A lot of Goys are lazy and stupid. They drag down the rest of us.

Anonymous said...

Who does this remind you of?

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m486vvvpey1rwu6dno1_500.jpg

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!

Frank Galton

Dan said...

Aneuran Bevan knew this bastard. It goes deep doesn't it? That connection makes me feel sad.

Anonymous said...

James said: “David Irving reckons his publisher wanted to know if he was a Jew because otherwise it would be harder to sell a book about Hitler, since most of the market for books was Jewish. i.e. only Jews bothered to read the damned things.”

James, the reason he (Irving’s publisher) asked Irving if he was a Jew is because Irving couldn’t find anything in the official archives that stated Hitler had knowledge of, or was complicit in the so-called holocau$t, and omitted all references to the so-called holocau$t in his book about Hitler.

Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

James,

The term "affirmative action" was first used in the United States in Executive Order 10925 and was signed by President John F. Kennedy on 6 March 1961. Executive Order 10925 required government contractors to "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are EMPLOYED and that employees are treated during EMPLOYMENT without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin."

Note that during this time (1961–1962), Arthur Goldberg (Jew) served as United States Secretary of LABOR. followed by fellow Jew W. Willard Wirtz (1962–1963).

Also note that President John F. Kennedy’s SPECIAL COUNSEL, ADVISER and SPEECHWRITER, Ted Sorensen – who President Kennedy once called his “INTELLECTUAL BLOOD BANK – was also a Jew.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Sorensen

Frank Galton

Keiser said...

Oh dear

Apparently this is an official poster

Bill said...

Why are Israelis so blunt. The BBC hack praising the Jews bends over backwards not to appear 'anti-semitic':

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22089936

Meanwhile the mischling PM Cameron fills establishment positions with white hating anti-British lefties:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2308301/How-Lefts-grip-Britain-tightening.html

Shaunantijihad said...

Frank,

I lifted this from a site about Churchill's great tome:

"THE SECOND WORLD WAR is, without doubt, Churchill's best known work. It was a huge best-seller when new, and has been in print contnuously for 57 years now, with translations into over 20 languages, including both of the principal enemies of the war....

This work was a major project, with a vast number of dates, names, facts, and quotations to be verified. There was considerable activity with galley proofs, revisions and correction. It originally appeared serialised in The Daily Telegraph. In 1948 as publication of the first volume was due, Churchill wanted more revisions and corrections."

...and so on.

And like Irving, Churchill himself made not a single reference to any Holohoax. He made many references to Jews being in charge of Communism though.

Funny that. Maybe that means he saw Jews in his cornflakes, by being a.. a.. DENIAR! Shock horror!!

tokyo paddy said...

I still cannot get my head around the seeming fact that Beria is not jewish. Everything about him, even his appearance, screams it - at me anyway.

Anonymous said...

I am sure that the yellow brick road has it’s origins in an allegorical study of the bankers doing what they do best! I shall look it up (it pisses me off to have to keep looking up). Hollywood , I must admit, did a brilliant job of inversion .
The ‘establishment’ must be laughing their cocks off, at all those twats dancing to ‘their’ tune
dofornow

James said...

Frank,

Perhaps you are right about that. I'l check the book and see if he adds to it. There may have been academic uses of the term earlier maybe.
It may have been called something else before Kennedy, but my point was that Jewish enrollments into universities were curtailed in the 1920s and 1930s. That was when tests for "character" were first introduced, in order to promote "diversity" in universities. This was not originally and anti-white practice. Following president Kennedy's meddling it became quite anti-white in the workplace. The most viciously anti-white employment discrimination was enacted by the Nixon administration, and has never been exceeded, before or since. Not even Clinton or Obama have got close to the draconian anti-white policies of Nixon, according the the book.
We shouldn't really be arguing when we agree. I'm just adding to what is already assumed.

James said...

ames, the reason he (Irving’s publisher) asked Irving if he was a Jew is because Irving couldn’t find anything in the official archives that stated Hitler had knowledge of, or was complicit in the so-called holocau$t, and omitted all references to the so-called holocau$t in his book about Hitler.

Maybe. I was just quoting what I remembered from the video Uncle Nasty provided recently. In that he just asked if he was Jewish, and when DI asked why he said a book about Hitler is much easier to sell if a Jew wrote it. DI asked him why that is the case, and the publisher told him, "because Jews are the only ones that buy books".

Maybe you are right, but I don't remember. I'll watch the video again.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Dofornow said:-

I am sure that the yellow brick road has it’s origins in an allegorical study of the bankers doing what they do best! I shall look it up (it pisses me off to have to keep looking up). Hollywood , I must admit, did a brilliant job of inversion .
The ‘establishment’ must be laughing their cocks off, at all those twats dancing to ‘their’ tune
dofornow


This may be what you're looking for ...?

http://paws.wcu.edu/mulligan/www/oz.html

or this ...

http://www.freedom-school.com/the_wizard_of_oz.pdf

or this

http://mises.org/Community/blogs/mowerybc/pages/oz-as-allegory.aspx

You're welcome.

UN
.

mack said...

Anonymous said...
I am sure that the yellow brick road has it’s origins in an allegorical study of the bankers doing what they do best!


Chapter 1 of Ellen Brown's Web Of Debt has a pretty convincing explanation of the "hidden meaning" behind the Wizard Of Oz:

Web Of Debt Chapter 1

Briefly, the Wizard of Oz is "secretly" about silver as a populist solution to the monetary problem. Silver advocates said there is not enough gold around to support the economy, so augment the monetary supply with silver.

Hardly a revolutionary idea if you ask me, since it is still going along with the fallacious idea that money should be based on a commodity, and it doesn't even address the issue of how money enters the economy (lent as a debt or spent debt-free?)

Web Of Debt is a confused book, but the bit about the Wizard of Oz was an interesting bit of trivia.

katana said...

Here's a thought provoking speech given by Mike Whitby of the BNP at some local club (Note: I'm not endorsing the BNP here).

A good summary of the impact and history of the jew run Frankfurt School's destruction in Britain.

Quite a few, on the ground examples, of the consequences. Although he doesn't mention jews directly he talks about the zionists.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZoj2fLbYk0

-------
Published on Sep 18, 2012
Cllr Mike Whitby, gives an interesting speech about the threat of the Frankfurt School and the New World Order. Mike spoke about the Frankfurt School's 11-point plan, how it was set out to destroy nationalism in the 1920s and how it is all coming true today.

Previously omitted from youtube - upload by request.
------------
A commenter wrote:

KarlBNP 6 months ago
Maybe the Nazi's were the ones who stood up against Jewish Zionism? maybe they were aware of the threat yet to come, but Zionism occupied our country's and brainwashed us into thinking that the Nazis were evil.
-----------

The truth will out said...

"tokyo paddy said...
I still cannot get my head around the seeming fact that Beria is not jewish. Everything about him, even his appearance, screams it - at me anyway.

13 April 2013 09:47"


You mean the psychopathic, jewish looking, jewish behaving Satanic murderous demon Beria.

who say's he's not a jew?
Oh yeah, our resident hasbarat does.

Here's a little entry that demonstrates how the twisted jew helps misdirect and obfuscate the truth.
(Happy Jewish Disinformation about Lavrenty Pavlovich Beria)

http://www.jewornotjew.com/profile.jsp?ID=46

"Don't believe those websites; Beria's only connection to Jews is the number he killed. And we can go into detail and list all his crimes, but we don't have the time or the patience. If you are curious, the internet is at your fingertips. Look it up.

So why the rumor-mongering? Apparently, Beria "was often described as looking like a Jew".
----------------------------------------

(The actual story of Beria from an old Wikipedia entry which has now removed the "born into a Jewish family" — Typical Jewish coverup!!! )

Rise to power

Like Stalin, Beria was a Mingrelian from Georgia. He was born into a Jewish family, in Merkheuli, near Sukhumi in the Abkhazian region of Georgia. He was educated at a technical school in Sukhumi, and is recorded as having joined the Bolshevik Party in March 1917 while an engineering student in Baku. (Some sources say that the Baku Party records are forgeries and that Beria actually joined the Party in 1919. It is also alleged that Beria joined and then deserted from the Red Army at this time, but this has not been established.)

In 1999 the Russian historian Anton Antonov-Ovseyenko published Beria, the first fully researched biography of Beria. This book confirmed what had long been claimed by anti-Soviet writers, and alluded to in Khrushchev's autobiography, but not generally believed: that in addition to his leading role in repression by the Soviet state, Beria was also a sadist and a sexual predator.

"At night he would cruise the streets of Moscow seeking out teenage girls," Antonov-Ovseyenko has said in an interview. "When he saw one who took his fancy he would have his guards deliver her to his house. Sometimes he would have his henchmen bring five, six or seven girls to him. He would make them strip, except for their shoes, and then force them into a circle on their hands and knees with their heads together. He would walk around in his dressing gown inspecting them. Then he would pull one out by her leg and haul her off to rape her. He called it the flower game."

Beria is also known to have personally tortured and killed many victims of the purges, particularly women. The graves of many of these people were subsequently discovered in the garden and cellars of his Moscow residence, now the Tunisian Embassy. In 2001 human bones were found concealed behind the kitchen walls when the building was renovated. In the cellars the walls are in places scorched black where, it is said, Beria used a blowtorch to torture confessions out of his victims.



http://www.iraq-war.ru/article/173728





If it looks like a virus, infects like a virus and lies like a virus...

The truth will out said...

Found this article on incogman.net and it is relevant, I cannot vouch for its authenticity but it's apparently a censored interview with Pope Francis before he was selected.

It's worth reading, whether you're a believer or not, as it appears from my perspective that he knows the number of the beast, and he speaks on the matter far more candidly than I've yet to have heard from a leader of the organisation since my birth.

I left the church when I was a kid, I still had/have faith in Jesus, just not the church and it's subversion by the jew.

Please take the time to read, whether you're a believer or of faith it really is a worthwhile read, especially if you're the former, while it will give new hope to the latter.


CENSORED in America: MSNBC INTERVIEW WITH CARDINAL BERGOGLIO PRIOR TO THE RECENT CONCLAVE IN VATICAN


Delenda Est Judaica/Main Stream Novus!

nastiestuncle said...

Apparently, the evidence for Beria being a Jew is a deleted Wikipedia entry.

Hahahahaha.


In "The Truth (lol) will out"'s house, there are Jews in the fridge, Jews in the cereal, Jews in his bed and Jews in his head.

He's insane. But if you're a co-JewObsessionist then he's a reasonable chap.

:)


This is why we can't have nice things, because people like him make anti-immigration toxic. They hate Jews more than they love their own children. They share responsibility for the rape of young white girls.

The truth will out said...

...should read "while it's not entirely relevant" "whether you're a non-believer or of faith", not to mention a couple of other typos...

I really should get a secretary to proofread before I post

nastiestuncle said...

@The truth will out 13:13

"I really should get a secretary to proofread before I post"

You need a proof thinker as well. I've never seen so much drivel in my life, you nutty fruit. You're crazy for those sun-ripened raisins.

The truth will out said...

Oy Vey!



"This is why we can't have nice things, because people like him make anti-immigration toxic."

Not the juwes who've been behind every anti-fascist movement assaulting every nationalist group and or meetings set up to bring together white people and the instigators of the promotion of 'hate speech' laws, multiculturalism, mass immigration, denationalization, subversion of traditional values.
http://balder.org/imbri

"They hate Jews more than they love their own children."

"Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us." - Golda meir

"They share responsibility for the rape of young white girls."

Yes by highlighting the evil that lurks behind every nation wrecking policy and bringing to the fore the jew behind each avenue of attack on the white race, I must take responsibility for every biological assault on white woman by the dark races, which the juwes sent here with the implicit intent to do just that.

Funny how the jew likes to blame the victim, it's almost as though the all suffer from the same psychological disorder, a mind-virus is what they are.

nastiestuncle said...

@The truth will out 13:26

"Oy Vey!"

Jewish much?

"Not the juwes who've been behind every anti-fascist movement assaulting every nationalist group and or meetings set up to bring together white people and the instigators of the promotion of 'hate speech' laws, multiculturalism, mass immigration, denationalization, subversion of traditional values."

Well, no. Hitler and the national socialists made nationalism toxic, and today's national socialists continue his tradition. In other words, they have learned nothing in 80 years.

"I must take responsibility for every biological assault on white woman by the dark races, which the juwes sent here with the implicit intent to do just that."

By making it impossible, by being a national socialist and therefore sounding stupid and crazy, for anyone to form a popular anti-immigration movement, you share indirect responsibility for the rape of young white girls by immigrants who we would otherwise not have if people like you had not turned the public off of nationalist politics.

"Funny how the jew likes to blame the victim, it's almost as though the all suffer from the same psychological disorder, a mind-virus is what they are."

There is no Jew in this conversation, unless you are one, Mr "Oy Vey".

I have no idea whether you are white, but I do know that if you gave a shit about white girls, you wouldn't make it so difficult to stop their rapists flooding into the country. For every white girl who is raped, you share a little bit of the responsibility, because what's important to you is obsessing about Jews rather than stopping and reversing immigration.

That's some food for thought. If indeed you know how to think.

Dan said...

Anyone posting as much as NU is obviously being paid. Especially so given the amount of abuse heaped on his head.

He's probably got lots of nice things, the WE is the operative word in this sentence...

This is why we can't have nice things, because you dare to point out who is doing this to you and yours.

NU has plenty of nice things and plenty of time to say his piece. He's a swinish troll.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Interesting thing about Beria -- while we seem to be on the subject -- was that he definitely showed a jewish propensity for domination. It was reliably reported that he not only had a hand in Stalin's death ...

http://www.executedtoday.com/2009/12/23/1953-lavrenty-beria-stalin-henchman/

... But actually sodomised the dying Stalin just before that old fucker shuffled off to his own, much deserved, reward.

Secondly, like most sadistic psychopaths, Beria was a physical coward, and upon hearing that he was to be executed (admittedly after a suspiciously rapid trial) he literally soiled himself and fell on his knees wailing for mercy.

Incontinence was quite a problem for this boy, for, as Nikita Khrushchev (who was to replace Stalin) so charmingly reported Beria's reaction when first arrested: "He dropped a load in his trousers!"

One consolation is that Beria's final moments (like Stalin's) were horrific.

UN
.

nastiestuncle said...

@Dan 13:47

"He's probably got lots of nice things, the WE is the operative word in this sentence..."

I don't have a Nintendo WE. That wasn't part of my remuneration package.

The truth will out said...

Seeing as the filthy vermin rat has polluted and fouled a piece I was hoping some may take the time to read, most likely it will be missed and skimmed over, which is this foul juden's aim and intent.
So I'll reprint the full interview taken with the then Cardinal and now Pope, unaired due to his honesty.



PS - anyone notice paris claims snidy yet seemingly legit post earlier that was written in response to Frank Galton's following comment.
================================================

"UN

Just Googled "Why does everyone hate jews?" and it shows 13,500,000 (Thirteen and a half million) hits.

It’s no wonder the likes of nastiestkushim trawl through internet 24/7. They’re panicking.

Frank Galton
"

- - - -
"340,000,000 hits for "why does everyone hate christians?" I can't be bothered to try muslims, hindus coons etc
Paris Claims
"

I just highlighted the quoted text and searched in google...
About 22,300 results

I took the liberty of taking snapshot for purpose of removing all element of doubt
http://postimg.org/image/kau19xdjl/

paris claims, how would you define your online presence on this forum?
Genuine concerned white citizen searching for a solution, or simply one of Satan's little helpers.

The truth will out said...

(Page 1)

CENSORED in America: MSNBC INTERVIEW WITH CARDINAL BERGOGLIO PRIOR TO THE RECENT CONCLAVE IN VATICAN
This is a remarkable blackballed interview - a phony catholic layman journalist and a cardinal, clearly a believing Christian, a believer in Jeffersonian liberties and the "radical" US Constitution bequeathed to Americans by their Founders.


Argentine Cardinal Jorge Maria Bergoglio
MSNBC INTERVIEW WITH Cardinal Bergolio An interview prior to the recent conclave

The following is a transcript of an interview between CHRIS MATHEWS, MSNBC atheist American journalist and then Cardinal Bergolio. It is clear why the interview was never broadcast.
______________________

CAMERA ON / BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

REPORTER: Welcome Cardinal.

BERGOGLIO: Thank you. Happy to speak with you.

REPORTER: Well, let me get into it directly. Last conclave, you were almost elected Pope. Can this happen again?

BERGOGLIO: What? That I will almost be the Pope, again?

REPORTER: No. Will you be the next Pope?

BERGOGLIO: Friend, I’m only jesting with you. I understand the question. I will not be the next Pope.

REPORTER: Why not?

BERGOGLIO: I chose not to. God has someone else in mind I’m certain.

REPORTER: But you would take the job if it were offered.

BERGOGLIO: I think not.

REPORTER: Why not.

BERGOGLIO: I believe I’m too embroiled in the secular fiasco. It is a spiritual job and I’m a soldier. Look at the nature of power. In Europe first and now in America, elected men have taken it upon themselves to indebt their people to create an atmosphere of dependency. And why? For their own selfish need to increase their own personal power. I’ve been a keen observer of the effect this has on the people, especially the poor. They are very good at creating poverty where there is no reason to explain it. My job is try to alleviate poverty and if that means to oppose the ‘cause then I will not be Pope.

REPORTER: But you are worried you would be a spend thrift pope?

BERGOGLIO: Friend. Where did you go to school?

REPORTER: La Salle College High School in Pennsylvania and….

BERGOGLIO: And after that?

REPORTER: College of the Holy Cross.

BERGOGLIO: They told me you were Catholic. Once elected the Pope is by virtue of the promise of Jesus to Peter, the Pope is preserved from the possibility of error. God would change any spend thrift politician into a responsible Pope. I’m just saying I’m not that man.

REPORTER: So what is your job?

BERGOGLIO: My job is to ask you, “why are men creating poverty?”

REPORTER: What do you mean?

BERGOGLIO: I mean that poverty is part of the natural condition and that is bad enough. But my task is to prevent the aggravation of this condition. The ideology that adds to the poverty must be denounced. I have and this is the reason I will not be Pope. I have a saying for myself, “No more poverty than God originally intended in the fall from Grace.”

REPORTER: Oh.

BERGOGLIO: It is a spiritual choice and I’m a political person. I’m sorry. I know you will make more money from this interview if I’m Pope. Or want to be Pope. But I’m sorry. I can’t help you. God has already chosen someone anyway. Right? You learned this in school?

REPORTER: Yes. Well… Where are you on the issues that matter most, issues about contraception, women priests?

BERGOGLIO: This might be a surprise to you, but I am Catholic. We are Catholic. It isn't an issue and for you to pretend that it is being debated goes against God.

REPORTER: If you were Pope then you would not change anything.

BERGOGLIO: Certainly God would direct the new Pope to have more compassion for these newly created poor. And if there is any social justice in the Church, the new Pope would have a stern word for the creators of the new situation.

REPORTER: But you are staunchly orthodox on the issues of abortion, contraception, and same-sex marriage.

BERGOGLIO: I am catholic.

Uncle Nasty said...

The Truth Will Out posts a link to the interview with Cardinal Bergoglio

(13 April 2013 13:10)

In which a smartarsed and, one might add thick as pigshit MSNBC reporter (and agenda-monkey) gets his shrivelled little goolies handed to him in a bag.

The following is a transcript of an interview between CHRIS MATHEWS, MSNBC atheist American journalist and then Cardinal Bergolio. It is clear why the interview was never broadcast.

A wonderfully relevant quote:-

REPORTER: I’m sorry, I’m just trying to do my job.

BERGOGLIO: And what job is that?

REPORTER: I’ve been sent to interview eight men in line for the papacy.

BERGOGLIO: And I guarantee you that they all oppose abortion. So…

REPORTER: But…

BERGOGLIO: So, you feel like you need to alienate the eight from the flock?

REPORTER: That isn’t it. How can the church attract young people when it is opposed to abortion and contraception?

BERGOGLIO: Young people are just as attracted to the truth as they are convenience and expediency. So we will call it a draw.

REPORTER: Doesn't the church need to modernize?

BERGOGLIO: Finally, I’ve met someone who will advocate publicly painting over the Sistine Chapel with one of the contemporary street artists. Are you sure you support this and in public?

REPORTER: What?

BERGOGLIO: Forgive me, I was rude.

REPORTER: Won’t the new pope, don't these cardinals realize what they've gotta do if they want to attract young people to the church?

BERGOGLIO: I am a cardinal.


You've been pwned, Mathews. Suck it up. If this is your best and brightest, you're fucked.

An amazing link, TTWO. Never mind the happy MSN horse exhaust about the CC being a spent force ... it ain't. Not with people like Bergoglio

UN
.

The truth will out said...

Page 2

REPORTER:You were punished for opposed same-sex marriage in Argentina. You opposed free contraception and the government exiled you. What do you have to say about that?

BERGOGLIO: I am catholic.

REPORTER: In the secular world, as you say, you follow the conservative line. You oppose, uh, same-sex marriages, very popular with young people. You are conservative on birth control. Won’t that be the doom of the Church, alienating young people who support reality based faith?

BERGOGLIO: Since God created the world, he also created reality. You seem to be arguing that a man can’t be Catholic in reality. Son, you are a Catholic?

REPORTER: Yes, of course. I meant no disrespect.

BERGOGLIO: You don’t have to worry about offending me.

REPORTER: Okay, good. Can a, uh, Pope even be elected if he is pro-choice or pro-love? I mean isn’t the election sort of fixed in favor of anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage?

BERGOGLIO: Yes, the election is fixed by God.

REPORTER:Very witty.

BERGOGLIO: Well, you did ask.

REPORTER: It is being reported in America that you are against marriage equality. Is that why you feel that you can’t be Pope?

BERGOGLIO: God chooses the Pope and God also made men and women different.

REPORTER:But you are...a conservative and oppose abortion!

BERGOGLIO: Friend the expression on your face gives you away.

REPORTER: I’m sorry, I’m just trying to do my job.

BERGOGLIO: And what job is that?

REPORTER: I’ve been sent to interview eight men in line for the papacy.

BERGOGLIO: And I guarantee you that they all oppose abortion. So…

REPORTER: But…

BERGOGLIO: So, you feel like you need to alienate the eight from the flock?

REPORTER: That isn’t it. How can the church attract young people when it is opposed to abortion and contraception?

BERGOGLIO: Young people are just as attracted to the truth as they are convenience and expediency. So we will call it a draw.

REPORTER: Doesn't the church need to modernize?

BERGOGLIO: Finally, I’ve met someone who will advocate publicly painting over the Sistine Chapel with one of the contemporary street artists. Are you sure you support this and in public?

REPORTER:What?

BERGOGLIO: Forgive me, I was rude.

REPORTER: Won’t the new pope, don't these cardinals realize what they've gotta do if they want to attract young people to the church?

BERGOGLIO: I am a cardinal.

REPORTER: Won’t the new pope, don't you and the other cardinals realize what they must do if they want to attract young people to the church?

BERGOGLIO: I’ve explained the mysteries of the atom to rural young people and also I’ve explained the Grace of God. And you know what? They can understand both perfectly well. Frankly, I have more trouble with adults understanding both.

REPORTER: But they have done focus groups; if you want to spread your message you can't have this position that's anti-gay marriage and anti-contraception.

BERGOGLIO: And you treat the church as a political institution.

REPORTER: So we were not gonna see any kind of change when it comes to things that matter like abortion or gay marriage?

BERGOGLIO: All eight of the men you will be talking to are Catholic.

REPORTER: Okay, I understand. Let’s talk about your controversial stand on poverty.

BERGOGLIO: You want it to be controversial?

REPORTER: But don’t you blame various governments around the world for poverty?

BERGOGLIO:Some Yes.

The truth will out said...

Page 3

REPORTER: But you refuse to blame corporations for their role.

BERGOGLIO: Okay, they also told me you have a degree in economics. No buyer, or seller either, enters into any exchange against his will. It is the nature of the economy. Man is frail, and he makes mistakes and sometimes is greedy and they enter into exchanges that don’t help them. Sometimes they become poor, but they made choices. There is nothing the Church can do except try to educate people to become good consumers. Chiefly, for me, it is an education solution on that side. And the Church has more schools around the globe than any other faith. I say teach the people to save their souls, and also teach them how not to become poor. And now not to allow the government to trick them into poverty.

REPORTER: And you blame government.

BERGOGLIO: No, I blame the self-serving politicians.

REPORTER: So your solution to poverty is to change the nature of politics?

BERGOGLIO: Please feel free to broadcast this; I don’t want to be pope. Friend, you are a socialist and your friends are socialists. And you are the reason for 70 years of misery in Russia and Europe now is seizing in pain from your policies. You believe in the redistribution of wealth and it makes entire populations poor. You want to nationalize everything and bring every human endeavor under your control. You destroy a man’s incentive to take care of his very own family, a crime against nature and nature’s God. You want social control over populations and incrementally you are making everything against the law. Together this ideology creates more poverty today than all the corporations you vilify have in the history of man.

REPORTER: I’ve never heard such from a Cardinal. I’m not sure if you are here to help yourself or disqualify yourself.

BERGOGLIO: Please air this interview. People being dominated by socialists need to know we don’t all have to be poor. Some poverty is part of our being cast out of the Garden of Eden. But look at the empire of dependency created by Hugo Chavez. Promising them, tricking them into worship of government and his very own person. Giving them fish but not allowing them to fish. If a fisherman does develop a talent today in Latin America; he is castigated and his catch stolen by the socialists. He stops…

REPORTER: You would be the first pope from the Americas.

BERGOGLIO: He stops fishing. I will not be pope, but yes I am from Argentina.

REPORTER: And you didn't want to be pope?

BERGOGLIO: God didn’t want me to be pope.

REPORTER: Perhaps he changed his mind.

BERGOGLIO: Ludicrous.

REPORTER: Okay, I’m sorry. I feel like we are getting off on the wrong path. I’m sorry.

BERGOGLIO: Yes, lets be productive.

REPORTER: You are a classic conservative Catholic theologian?

BERGOGLIO: Of course there's politics clearly in the Curia throughout the Vatican, but in terms of church teaching, it's not a political institution. It's religious.

REPORTER: I heard people, in fact, media people, "Is this cardinal, is he a liberal? Is he a conservative?"

BERGOGLIO: Tell them please, “He's a Catholic.” It's no more complicated than that. Catholicism is what it is. You don't have to believe it; you may not. You don't have to follow it; you may not go to Mass. But it's not up to you to modernize us.

REPORTER: You see no room for reform?

BERGOGLIO: It's not up to any religion, although some do this, 'cause they want the money. They want the membership. But the Catholic Church doesn't do it. It's not up to them to bend and shape and mold itself to accommodate the shrinking depravity of a worldwide culture. It's to provide the exact opposite. It's to provide a beacon out of depravity, socialism and sin, among other things.

Uncle Nasty said...

.
Sorry TTWO, I hope I did not hijack the point of your post.

UN
.

The truth will out said...

Page 3

REPORTER: If pope you would be bad news for the left.

BERGOGLIO: I won’t be pope. But I am opposed to abortion. I’m opposed to euthanasia. The pro-choice movement is a culture of death. I oppose the demonic same-sex marriage. I oppose gay adoption on the grounds that it is discriminatory to the child. I was exiled by the Cristina Kirchner government, but I hold no grudge. How is this bad news?

REPORTER: John Paul II rescued you?

BERGOGLIO: He made me the archbishop of Buenos Aires. Yes.

REPORTER: And so you feel like you owe the Right some sort of repayment?

BERGOGLIO: There are many values… and many types of people. Perhaps it is my interest in mathematics, but I’m the type of human who is interested most in the truth. God gave me a healthy love for the truth. Loyalty is only a virtue if in support of the truth or another important value.

REPORTER: Cristina Kirchner said you held a grudge.

BERGOGLIO: Funny I’ve never spoken her name. Not once. And it is a battle of ideas not a battle of two or more people. I’m only concerned with ideas.

REPORTER: She said you refused to speak up for civil rights violations.

BERGOGLIO: As a spiritual leader, I opposed cultural modernization, and so I became a political enemy. I understand politics as well as I do mathematics.

REPORTER: And the Jesuits, they were eager to cast you out, which they did.

BERGOGLIO: So you are implying that I’m a vengeful priest?

REPORTER: Do you feel that you need to erase the progress recently made in Latin America?

BERGOGLIO: I say “poverty”. You say “progress”.

REPORTER: Lets talk about poverty.

BERGOGLIO: Sure, there is voluntary poverty that is virtuous. Many understood the nobility of making themselves independent of the fleeting things of earth. They are distractions from our pursuit of the truth. I have no problem with this. I only oppose involuntary poverty.

REPORTER: That is what I thought you would say.

BERGOGLIO: Why?

REPORTER: Because you are a capitalist right?

BERGOGLIO: Yes, I think capital is needed to build a factory, a parochial school, or a church or hospital, all. Do you oppose factories or churches or hospitals?

REPORTER: Of course not but don’t you think the capital is sucked out of people’s hands by greedy business types to pay for these factories?

BERGOGLIO: No, I think people agree, through their economic choices, that some of their money goes to build these. Capital building should be voluntary. Only when the politician confiscates their wealth, to build government factories, government schools, government hospitals; only then do the people not agree. Money given voluntarily is legitimate to build with. Money coerced from the people is not legitimate to build with, because it isn’t given voluntarily.

REPORTER: You are opposed to all government?

BERGOGLIO: No of course not. But it isn’t the seat of wisdom in any society I’ve seen in my life. The best government was created by the Americans, in which they admitted that people are “endowed by their creator” and most of the administration of society was left to the relationship between God and man. However, slowly that has been eroded by the atheists on the left, who would replace man’s relationship with God with a new relationship with an opportunist like Hugo Chavez.

REPORTER: I just found it fascinating that you were willing to stand up to an entire government in Argentina. You where cast aside. Didn’t you care about your career?

BERGOGLIO: Yes, there are people who cave to worldly authority. Even priests.

REPORTER: But you didn’t?

BERGOGLIO: No, I changed nothing. How did I have the power to change anything in church teaching? My opinion? The democrats, seeking votes, only wanted me to change my opinion and legitimize their decadence. I did not, as evidenced by the fact that I was teaching high school math in small isolated town.

REPORTER: I’m sorry that happened to you.

BERGOGLIO: Why don’t you feel for others oppressed for their interest in freedom.

REPORTER: Freedom isn’t punished anywhere, is it?

BERGOGLIO: Certainly it is.

The truth will out said...

Page 4

REPORTER: In Latin America?

BERGOGLIO: I’m afraid Latin America is lost. The people of the entire area are controlled by a bloc of militant “socialist” regimes in the region, most prominently Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia and Nicaragua. They have a gun pointed at their head. So their heart is now captured. Who will save them at this point?

REPORTER: So the game is over. Checkmate?

BERGOGLIO: Friend, I’ve been studying America this month, before the Pope chose to resign. You must not have fear at speaking the truth. It is for the salvation of souls and the recovery of Thomas Jefferson’s people. America must not fall to the new painted communism. Even the low information voters don’t want America to be sold into slavery. I pray they cast out the money changers in their government! What manner of government is there that condones sin? Abomination upon abomination--giving monies for the murder of children, giving monies for the murder of the elderly! You are an American. Your government, My child, has been infiltrated by men of sin.

REPORTER: These are pretty radical ideas.

BERGOGLIO: No. Perhaps reactionary. Radical means something different. But a very long time ago, Khrushchev warned, that we cannot expect Americans to fly from capitalism to communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans small injections of socialism until they suddenly awake to find out they have Communism. This is what is happening now in an ancient bastion of freedom. How can America save Latin America when they are slaves to the government themselves?

REPORTER: I’m having a hard time digesting most of this.

BERGOGLIO: The truth can be painful. You look angry; do you want to stop or ask a question? … But you have created a new type of state, the so-called ‘welfare state.’ This has happened in order to respond to the needs of the politically created poor. However, intervening directly is depriving the original society of its responsibility. Families escape responsibility in the welfare state. And churches even escape responsibility. People stop giving to charity and see every poor person as the government’s problem. I am a Catholic priest and there are no poor for me to take care of, they are made permanently poor and the property of the politicians.

REPORTER: I’m not sure this interview is going to work.

BERGOGLIO: You asked and now you will listen, my son. The social assistance state leads to a loss of human energies and an inordinate increase of public agencies, which are dominated more by bureaucratic thinking than by real concern for helping people. Needs are best understood and satisfied by people who are closest to them who act as neighbors and parish members to those in need. It should be added that certain kinds of demands often call for a response which is not simply material but which is capable of perceiving the deeper human need. This is not to mention the welfare state’s excesses and abuses.

REPORTER: I think we are done.

BERGOGLIO: Wait. If I speak on the ordination of women, on celibacy, on divorce, will you air this interview and my message?

REPORTER: No, we are done.

BERGOGLIO: Partially what irritates me to the core is the media’s inability to look at anything without looking into the cause of the various problems. People are made poor so they will vote for the very candidates that made them poor.

REPORTER: Have a nice day and thanks for your time.




I hope this

The truth will out said...

I hope the above interview comes as a pleasant surprise to some.



Delenda Est judaica!

nastiestuncle said...

@The truth will out 14:04

"Seeing as the filthy vermin rat has polluted and fouled a piece I was hoping some may take the time to read, most likely it will be missed and skimmed over, which is this foul juden's aim and intent."

Which "juden" is that? There are no Jews here to my knowledge.

Anyway, shouldn't you be out apologising to all the white girls you have helped to be raped?

I also decided to do some googling.

"Why does everyone hate jews?" = 10900

"Why does everyone hate christians?" = 22300

"Why does everyone hate muslims?" = 16900

"Why does everyone hate hindus?" = no results

"Why does everyone hate atheists?" = 5960

It appears that Hindus are the most popular, followed by atheists then Jews. Muslims have a bum deal but it seems that Christians are the most hated of all.

Christianity is an alien religion to the white people of Europe though.

The truth will out said...

Uncle Nasty

Not at all.

I'm glad you found it of some worth and you indeed highlight a particularly brilliant retort in the interview.


"REPORTER: Doesn't the church need to modernize?

BERGOGLIO: Finally, I’ve met someone who will advocate publicly painting over the Sistine Chapel with one of the contemporary street artists. Are you sure you support this and in public?"

Now that my friends is solid gold.

Is it just me, only it appears from rerading the transcript that Pope Francis has some meaningful insight as to the cause of the conditions of which our world ails.
If you ask me he might be one of those... anti-semites!

Let's fucking well hope so, not before time too!

nastiestuncle said...

@The truth will out 14:46

Hey Mr Rape Facilitator.

Catholicism is utter bullshit. Popes, cardinals, etc, are bullshit.

Dan said...

The new pope knows his stuff.

nastiestuncle said...

@Dan 15:19

"The new pope knows his stuff."

If he knew his stuff then he wouldn't have what it takes to be Pope. He wouldn't even be Catholic.

Anonymous said...

"The role of 'nastiest' is to attempt to disrupt the flow and discredit the quality of the information pertaining to the history and activities of our worst enemy - the deeply-embedded jew parasite."

True! Please ignore the troll.

"latest threads to 300+ posts.

This I should point out is an old hasbara trick (diversion #15 to be exact) to render a damaging or potentially dangerous post top-heavy, and therefore too unwieldy to navigate -- thereby effectively shutting it down ... not to mention the old tactic of off-topic flaming -- steering the topic into safer (for joos that is) waters.

UN
"

Come on people, let's work together on this one -- and try for one week -- to NOT respond to this narcissistic shit-disturber.

This virus needs oxygen to survive, and you're giving it life by mouth-to-mouth resuscitation with every one of your responses.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 16:05

Every post like that is an admission of your own pathetic nature. I used to get exactly the same on the Muslim forums because they were afraid.

No wonder you haven't used your usual name.

Anonymous said...

Shaunantijihad said(13 April 2013 10:38): “Frank, And like Irving, Churchill himself made not a single reference to any Holohoax. He made many references to Jews being in charge of Communism though.”

Found this comment re Churchill’s ‘Triumph and Tragedy’ (The Second World War, Volume 6)

“Having read the first five volumes of Churchill's magnificent history of the war that he was so instrumental in winning, I looked forward somberly to the last volume, fully expecting the "tragedy" in the title to refer to the fate of the Jews in Germany and throughout Europe. But as I worked my way through that volume, I found almost no references to this true tragedy of humanity. The tragedy in question was Churchill's ouster at the end of the war. I finished the volume in disbelief. Checking the index to see if somehow I'd slept through this portion of his tome, I found no reference to holocaust, none to concentration camps, none to the Final Solution, and the only references to Jews are their organizing of a fighting force, their mistreatment in Hungary and an escape in Greece. I have long wondered at this terrible omission, and long to read what the New York Times had to say about this book when it was first published.”

http://www.amazon.com/Triumph-Tragedy-Second-World-Volume/product-reviews/0395075408?pageNumber=2


Can’t find any reviews of Churchill’s "The Second World War" in the New York Times (wonder why?) although there are some references to a 1953 magazine article. but I did find this New York Times book review of 'In Command of History': How Churchill REVISED (LOL!!!) World War II’, a book about Churchill’s six volume "The Second World War".

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/13/books/review/13boot.html?pagewanted=all

“Reynolds THOROUGHLY EXPOSES CHURCHILL'S REVISIONS OF HISTORY”

LOL!

Should have read: “The stupid goy schmuck left out Holocau$t!!!”


“Even as prime minister, however, Churchill did not have personal knowledge of all aspects of the war...”

LOL!

Should have read: “Oy vey, even as prime minister, however, the dumb schmuck did not have personal knowledge of the Holocau$t...”

If only Churchill had mentioned the Holocau$t.


Frank Galton

Dan said...

It's remarkable that he connected aesthetics to moral philosophy.

Keiser said...

NU said...

It appears that Hindus are the most popular, followed by atheists then Jews. Muslims have a bum deal but it seems that Christians are the most hated of all.

Ah that's the difference between quantity and quality NU.

Christianity is an alien religion to the white people of Europe though.

Surely that doesn't mean it is not true however.

Dan said...

The crack about the sistine chapel was solid gold.

nastiestuncle said...

@Keiser 17:12

It isn't untrue because it is alien. It is untrue because it isn't true. It's a religion.

Keiser said...

@ nastiestuncle

RE: 13 April 2013 17:23

Sometimes I find that religions, when you get past the corruption and pomp, contain certain transcendant truths. So I would be reticent to consider them completely bunk.

Also sometimes "religious" values such as forgiveness make good psychological sense as they liberate the self from unhealthy psychological pursuits. I leave you with this...

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Hamlet Act 1, scene 5, 159–167

Keiser said...

Nu said
"It appears that Hindus are the most popular, followed by atheists then Jews. Muslims have a bum deal but it seems that Christians are the most hated of all.

K said
Ah that's the difference between quantity and quality NU."


Just to clarify

I was not referring to the quality or quantity of NU's comments which epitomise what I like to call "the way of the virus" (I have learned much about trolling from him)

I was in fact referring to quantity and quality of hatred toward religious groups as in more may hate Christians but when they are hated Jews are hated more.

nastiestuncle said...

@Keiser 18:28

A religion might teach something which is arguably true, such as helping the needy is a good thing, but they themselves are works of fiction, and hence false.

Far better to come to the conclusion yourself that helping the needy is a good thing without having to be told it by a religion.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 18:20

"nastiestkushim"

There is no one here by that name.

Keiser said...

@NU 13 April 2013 18:35

Well which came first the chicken or the egg.

Look at it like this, theory is religion and practice is good deed. Religion is merely instruction but the precepts and concepts it instructs upon are real.

Personally I feel there must be a prime mover (God if you will) as otherwise everything we do, including good deeds, amount to naught but narcissistic pursuits.

Keiser said...

NU said...

"Far better to come to the conclusion yourself that helping the needy is a good thing without having to be told it by a religion."

Further to my previous point I feel that one arrives at that conclusion by faith as opposed ones own will which would again amount to narcissism, the vice du Jour amongst society today.

Dan said...

Religion isn't an abstraction. It's a warning to the innocent to watch out for people like Jacob, Ciaphas, Pilate.

Even if large segments of it are myth. People wrote these stories down to warn people to watch their backs.

nastiestuncle said...

@Keiser 19:15

Of course the person derives a good feeling by doing something they deem to be good or charitable.

Then there's doing a good deed when it leads to a loss for a do gooder.

But back to religion though. They're all false though of course. Bearded men in the sky watching you masturbate? Nigga, please.

More than 90% of people worldwide are prone to being religious though. That's more than 90% of people with either an intelligence problem or an intellectual honesty problem, or both.

Keiser said...

"More than 90% of people worldwide are prone to being religious though. That's more than 90% of people with either an intelligence problem or an intellectual honesty problem, or both."

Funny, I would have said that a person who is unable to deduce the links, via their innate faculty of reasoning, between the doctrine of the Trinity and our own human condition, in doing so bringing themselves to a point where a leap of faith is not only possible but dare I say incumbent, is guilty of intellectual sloth.

Again perhaps we differ here and I respect that.

Dan said...

Do you think that CS Lewis had an intelligence problem?

Or Tolkein?

Utterly devout, that they were?

The Church (Churches) are great morale boosters for our peoples. Communion with others cannot be underestimated for the purpose of group protection. Of course, religion has been more or less appropriated by modern tax statutes and turned into a mirror image of liberal orthodoxy.

nastiestuncle said...

@Dan 19:55

More likely a case of intellectual honesty.

Anonymous said...

That's more than 90% of people with either an intelligence problem or an intellectual honesty problem, or both.

90% of jews have an intelligence problem. You learn something new everyday.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 20:10

Not the non-religious ones, surely.

Shaunantijihad said...

TTWO, that's an amazing interview. What is the reference please?

Anonymous said...

If they let the rabbi fellate their sons as it is a cultural tradition?

James said...

Ha ha Nastiest Uncle is an Athiest.

Unfortunately for him, that's a religion too.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 21:37

Atheism's not a religion, for god's sake.

Uncle Nasty said...

Dan said...

It's remarkable that he connected aesthetics to moral philosophy.

It's essential. I offer (for example) the works of Waterhouse ...

http://tinyurl.com/the-Works-of-Waterhouse

Compared to what can be called the works of degenerates ...

http://tinyurl.com/bthden4

or this ...

http://www.heretical.com/miscellx/jewart.html

or this ...

http://www.heretical.com/miscellx/jewart2.html

UN
.

James said...

NU thinks Atheism is not a religion, but National Socialism is a religion?

That's an interesting position, isn't it?

Is it justifiable at all?

James said...

Nastiest Uncle thinks he is more perfect and right than at least 90% of the world's population.

He thinks latching on to Atheism is purely rational and not an act of faith.

Ha ha ha.
Atheism is no more provable than religion.

God help us all if he was dictator.

James said...

If they let the rabbi fellate their sons as it is a cultural tradition?

Lets be fair, sucking cicumcision blood out with a mouthful of wine is not really felatio.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 22:29

"NU thinks Atheism is not a religion, but National Socialism is a religion?

That's an interesting position, isn't it?

Is it justifiable at all?"

It is indeed, my young Padawan. But I am surprised that you cannot see it yourself.

A national socialist knows, once shown, that Anne Frank's diary was not written in biro but he choose to believe it was anyway, because it reinforces his religious-style thinking and belief about Jews. The same with denying the Holocaust, believing that Hitler and Nazis were good guys, that Jews started WW2 and so on.

A Muslim knows, once shown, that Islam is not a religion of peace, but he believes it is anyway because it fits in with his faith. The Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia was so religious that he said "the earth is flat and anyone who says otherwise is an apostate who deserves to be killed" (Islam, like Christianity, is a flat earth religion).

National socialists go through the same kind of thought processes to believe what they believe as do Muslims, Christians, socialists, marxists, the politically correct, and so on. It is religious-style thinking. It involves thought plus feeling and of course a lack of intellectual honesty.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 22:34

"Nastiest Uncle thinks he is more perfect and right than at least 90% of the world's population."

I never said anything about perfection.

"He thinks latching on to Atheism is purely rational and not an act of faith."

I never said any such thing.

"Atheism is no more provable than religion."

Indeed 'tis not true.

"God help us all if he was dictator."

The cries would be in vain though.

PS. I'm not an atheist strictly speaking. One up from that. God does not play dice.

Anonymous said...

This virus needs oxygen to survive, and you're giving it life by mouth-to-mouth resuscitation with every one of your responses.

Correct.

Uncle Nasty said...

Off topic I know, but as Bette Davis famously said: Fasten your seat belts ... It's going to be a bumpy ride.

I do not pretend to knowledge of things economic or financial, but gold plummeted $80.00 on Friday, and the graph shows that it was still in free fall at close of play. That is 4% of its value.

In one day.

The endgame is now beginning in earnest.

UN
.

James said...

The Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia was so religious that he said "the earth is flat and anyone who says otherwise is an apostate who deserves to be killed" (Islam, like Christianity, is a flat earth religion).

Maybe he was joking? Maybe he was trying to make Islam look foolish and intolerant?
I find it hard to believe any true promoter of Islam would say that. It sounds more like something calculated to stir up trouble.
Saudi Arabia's elite are crypto jews. That's pretty well known.

James said...

A national socialist knows, once shown, that Anne Frank's diary was not written in biro but he choose to believe it was anyway, because it reinforces his religious-style thinking and belief about Jews.

So you agree with www.heretical.com on this then. But hang on, you said trusting www.heretical.com for anything was like trusting Revionistwhatever about nuclear power.
You showed prejudice against heretical, saying it was "unscientific", even when the page I supplied a link to was actually just a line of quotes from scientific sex researchers. Maybe you assume you know more than everyone else a little bit to often?

James said...

religious-style thinking and belief about Jews

Atheism is "religious-style thinking" too.
There is no proof that a God of some type doesn't exist.

James said...

UN,

Jim Sinclair said it would never drop below $1600 again. He was wrong. Was he lying? Dunno.

One thing is for sure, he will be getting massive amounts of hate mail calling him a god-dammned kike all day long today.

James said...

Nastiest Uncle,

You are religious. You worship yourself.

You also have unshakeable faith that you are correct in everything you say and think.

That is religion. The word means to be tied to something. You will never release yourself from your rigid world view. Never.

nastiestuncle said...

@James 00:00

The god people are in the assertive. It's for them to prove the existence of god, not other people to disprove.

James said...

If Hitler was a traitor who's job was the discredit National Socialism, does that automatically mean that National Socialism is a bankrupt philosophy, or that it was twisted and corrupted by the Nazis in order to be discredited?

If NS wasn't discredited by the Nazis, would it have some value?

Or is it in essence a deluded religion with no possible basis in reason?

James said...

The god people are in the assertive. It's for them to prove the existence of god, not other people to disprove.

Actually, they don't have to prove anything. They have faith.

You on the other hand believe that they have something to prove. Good luck proving that.

What makes you think they have something to prove to you? Nobody could convince you of anything.

James said...

The god people are in the assertive.

So atheists don't need any proof of their position? They rely solely on the failings of (probably corrupted) religions?

I'm sure we could go around in circles all day with this, but the point is, you've got no proof of the existence or non-existence of a god, and pointing out that your opposition has no proof either is a cop-out.

James said...

Another question for you NU.

If Hitler and his NSDAP party didn't spoil National Socialism, would it be a valid or invalid philosophy?
Would it's adherents still be religious nutters?

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim: “Anne Frank's diary was not written in biro”

http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/4787/holohoax1.jpg

LOL!

Frank Galton

James said...

NU,
You claim "
I never said anything about perfection."


Yet you also claim that "I have never been beaten on this blog."

The second statement in the above, is a claim of a perfect record on this blog, albeit without the literal use of the word "perfect" or its derivatives. The meaning however is clear. You believe you have a perfect record of argument success on this blog.

Please explain the discrepancy. Have I, against all odds, discovered the first slight contradiction in your statements, or is my self-congratulation premature?

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim: “The same with denying the Holocaust”

Tales of the Holohoax

http://ia700308.us.archive.org/7/items/TalesOfTheHolohoaxAJounalOfSatire/AJournalOfSatire-TalesOfTheHolohoax14P.Scan.pdf


Question: How long can the Jews perpetrate the Holocaust myth?

http://a4.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/36/3ba59e1e65c2479ab266274cfcb6687c/l.jpg


http://fotos.fotoflexer.com/49c0fe4785bd4abafe4e1b830761df9d.jpg

http://english.aviny.com/weekly-caricature/Holocaust.jpg

http://www.vho.org/tr/2004/1/Cartoon9.gif

http://theforbiddentruth.net/memberuploads/7_08.09.10hohoco$t.6.jpg

http://resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/MISC/misc_image10.jpg

http://www.patriot.dk/holohoax.gif

http://www.patriot.dk/holopol.gif

Frank Galton

James said...

Frank Galton,

Personally, I have no problem believing that Anne Frank hid from the Nazis (although they probably knew they were there all along), and that her family was split up, and that she died of Typhus in a horrible camp.

Also, I accept that her diary was revised after her death by her father. I don't see why its such an issue really. Lots of Jews died in WW2. Lots of other people did too. What is the big fuss about Anne Frank?

I think Simon on www.heretical.com has the final word on this, and it sounds reasonable. NU would say its rubbish because its on heretical, but his religion is refuting everything anyone ever says if he suspects they might be Nazis so while its worth mentioning its not that important.

http://www.heretical.com/sheppard/frank6.html

Question: Why did the Frank family never go out?
Answer: They were afraid that the Germans would capture them. However, especially in the later years of the war, many Jews were going around completely normally, having obtained false identity papers. The reason the Franks never went out was because they looked too Jewish.

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim: “A Muslim knows, once shown, that Islam is not a religion of peace....”

http://teresatorga3.no.sapo.pt/600million.gif

http://mwcnews.net/images/stories/art/israel-nuclear2.jpg


Frank Galton

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim: “National socialists go through the same kind of thought processes to believe what they believe as do Muslims, Christians, socialists, marxists, the politically correct, and so on.”

I see nastiestkushim “forgot” to add the Jews to his list. Wonder why?

HaHaHa!

Frank Galton

James said...

Following the publication of the complete manuscript and the forensic results it can no longer seriously be doubted that the Diary was by AMF's own hand.


This is from a "Nazi", so I guess that means the Diary of Anne Frank wasn't written by her? Nastiest Uncle? I'm confused can you help? One Nazi said it was fake, and another Nazi said she wrote it. How can this dilemma be resolved oh mighty brain of reason?
http://www.heretical.com/sheppard/bof1.html

nastiestuncle said...

@James 01:38

We've already done Anne Frank's diary. Go back and find the links.

James said...

Frank,

Yes, NU seems to think there are no Jews just as dumb as the National Socialists.

Of course there are. Lots of them. Jews are hyper-brainwashed people.

The public also seems to think that if a Jew says something about the Holocaust it simply MUST BE TRUE because a "Jew would know, how could you argue with someone who lost their family in the camps?".

Its all a big circle of absurdity. Go on amazon and look at any book on the topics we discuss here. Its all 5 star and 1 star reviews. Either way, whether the book is pro-jewish or the opposite the ratings will be either "wonderful" or "Zionist/Nazi trash". Very little in the way of balance. If NS types are "religious", Jewish types are even more so. (They even have an official religion - Judaism). NS types' religion, Hitler worship, Holocaust denial etc, are not official religions though.

nastiestuncle said...

@Anonymous 01:38

Jews belong to the list as well, but I'd hoped the reader would have got the message that all religions belonged to it without me having to list them all.

Cor blimey guv'nor.

James said...

We've already done Anne Frank's diary. Go back and find the links.

We are discussing your blanket refusal to accept anything on www.heretical.com at the moment because he might be a "Nazi". I don't want to discuss the Diary with you. I agree with you about the diary and the ball point pen.

My point was that you refuse to admit that Simon Sheppard agrees as well. Always have to be "right", don't you?

nastiestuncle said...

@James 01:17

My post about 90% of people...etc.... said nothing about me being more perfect than they.

Cor blimey, guv'nor.

James said...

We've already done Anne Frank's diary. Go back and find the links.


Ley me guess...
You said it was real, Nazis said it was fake. You won.

OK, I got it. No need to check the links.

James said...

NU...
"More than 90% of people worldwide are prone to being religious though. That's more than 90% of people with either an intelligence problem or an intellectual honesty problem, or both."

Then...

My post about 90% of people...etc.... said nothing about me being more perfect than they.

What a bullshit artist of the highest calibre you are.

Anonymous said...

nastiestkushim: “it reinforces his (a national socialist) religious-style thinking and belief about Jews.”

You can’t really blame them, can you nastiestkushim?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_IAuNcsWmZM/UQ1WomeCtJI/AAAAAAAAGUY/NejjaBFN0TU/s1600/gene%2Bpool.jpg

http://mynameisjoecortina.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/jews_image18.jpg?w=510

http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image09.jpg

http://balder.org/judea/billeder-judea/Cartoon-Holocaust-What-Did-Johnny-Learn-In-School-Todyay-300.jpg

Frank Galton

James said...

Jews belong to the list as well, but I'd hoped the reader would have got the message that all religions belonged to it without me having to list them all.

Since Jews are a central topic on this blog, you omitted them from your list on purpose in order to bait a response that you could then shoot down and be "right again".
What a slimey prick you are sometimes. Transparent as glass that was.

Anonymous said...

Will you two? fucking hasbarats give it a rest – enough already!

James/nastiestkushim is definitely One Jew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest!

Frank Galton

James said...

What hope is there for humanity?

"More than 90% of people worldwide are prone to being religious though. That's more than 90% of people with either an intelligence problem or an intellectual honesty problem, or both."

Of the remaining non-religious 10%, a large fraction must comprise of " socialists, marxists, the politically correct, and so on."

What's remaining then?

The only people with properly working brains are therefore Nastiest Uncle and a few atheists.

The rest of humanity is just wrong.
We can't count people that are none of the above because they don't think at all.

We are privileged to be in Nastiest Uncles company. It is a rare honour indeed to speak to someone who is not really human like everyone else.
He is the hope for humanity and we must listen to him, but not to the point of worship, mind you.

James said...

Frank Galton,

Do you still think we are the same person?

Keiser said...

Irish Savant Blog Sunday, 20 January 2013
Comment number four... prescient!

James said...

Question: How does this help save the white race?

http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/KIKES/jews_image09.jpg

Answer: It doesn't help save the white race.

PR is what's needed. NU does have a point in that respect.

CrackerClayMore said...

Posted to at http://www.whitelawtowers.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/nsw-schools-now-teaching-holocaust.html

http://kabbalahsecrets.com/

To understand the importance of numerology, and thus the holocaust number, 6 million, derived of kaaballah, readers and school teachers should read the above.

They will find that Israel was prophesied to be made undead in 1948.

In Judaism the number 18 represents 'life' or 'chai'... Kaaballah secrets suggests that the jewish messiah is to arrive, living, in 2018. The number of the color RED is 18 and is also the colour of blood which is shed in War, and the number of 'war" is 23 plus 1 plus 18, or 24 plus 18 or 42, the number of the jewish god. If 'by deception thou shall do war', then the jewish god is indeed a deceiver, and g-d is indeed "good".
The jews intend to roll out a carpet made red with goyische blood in a third world war to prepare the way for the arrival of the jewish messiah in 2018, so to expand the borders of israel to their prophesied dimension between the brook of the nile and the eurphrates.



Millions of Russians died at the bloodied hands of Bolshevik REDS post 1917.
Millions more others died in the two contrived world wars before the emergence of Israel in 1948.

As ANZAC day approaches, I for one now know why they fought, and died.

They died for this 'israel' and not for what they were led to believe.

ShadenFraude a particularly 'jewish' delicacy.


The articles of Dr Harrell Rhome quote jewish religious scripture that suggests the 'loss of the 6' had to happen prior to that.

The Australian government allows itself to be used a proxy for jewish propaganda. This constitutes a form of child abuse. It needs to end......NOW but it won't because the invertebrates who run the show ingratiate and prostrate themselves so to receive the vassalular approvals of the malevolents who target the mind of innocents.

But to suggest that the doctrines of jews be kept away from the minds and innocence of goyische children, constitutes, as the jews would wail ...."Anti-Semitism".

This is how far we have fallen. We let predators and perpetraitors near those least able to defend themselves. Some even encourage it, because it might elicit the sanctimonious approvals of the like of the BnaiBrith, a truly Evil organisation of duplicitous subversives, who actively practice the licence and entitlement granted by judaism to deceive those not "jewish".

Curiously, in Australia, the BnaiBrith run a "Courage to Care" program but the best confidence tricksters are ALWAYS your best friend and always care more and mostly about the welfare of those they target for a good fucking over...... don't they ?

Keiser said...

"ALWAYS your best friend and always care more and mostly about the welfare of those they target for a good fucking over...... don't they ? "

The best parasite is the one that doesn't kill its host outright.

@NU
Do you think I should maybe start writing my religion on the census form when it comes around as "Anti-Semite"

Gem Junior said...

Oh he is so annoying, and such an animal. There's no way he is on this site all the time disagreeing about everything we all know is common knowledge, and lecturing everybody, without getting paid. Someone is definitely paying NU for his time because his posts are so numerous, so contrary, and so projoooooooo that he says to people "oh, I work out of my home, where I have my office. I work on a computer all day doing marketing surveys and stuff" rather than "I spend all day trying to explain the rules to dumb cattle goyims who are breaking out of the brainwashing bell jars we fitted them with.. oy vey

Anonymous said...

"PS: Neither Munzenberg nor Beria were Jewish"

They may not have been Jews but they sure as hell acted like ones.

I bet they had Jewish mentors!

Anonymous said...

Re: Hollywood

"Well they are over represented. It isn't run by Jews though.

12 April 2013 23:03"

This Jew thinks so and I agree with him:

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,4676183.column

Uncle Nasty said...

Further to my earlier comments on the tribe's degradation of art and all things spiritual.

It appears I was not the first to feel this way.

In a 1925 Mercure de France, Vanderpyl, the art critic, wrote in an article "Does a Jewish school of painting exist?":

"...but suddenly Israelite painters swarm. In the after-the-war-salons the Levys are legion. Maxime Levy, Irene and Flore Levy, Simon Levy, Geo. Levy-Say, Alkan Levy... without counting the Levys who prefer to exhibit under pseudonyms of less Hebraic assonance – which is one of the habits of the modern Jew – and without mentioning the Cohen, Bloch, Weill, Zadok etc. which one gleans from every page of the catalogues. Whence comes and so immediately, this desire to paint, among the descendants of the ten tribes...? Broking, which is the buying and selling of goods that have no fixed or current values is the typical trade of the Jew. The day that painting became for the many a speculative business the Jew came in ..."

This accusation of Jewish commercial manipulations in the art market was met by silence.

Lindsay in Addled Art quotes Rene Guillouin in the Revue Hebdomadaire for January 1938 commenting on this Jewish racket:

"In a few years they have become the all-powerful masters of a rich and beautiful domain, traditionally free, the kingdom of the spirit. They have their Press, for making and destroying reputations, and in every country their agents, who pretend to the title of collector, once a noble distinction, are but hucksters and revendors. They 'place' their 'colts', as they call them in their ignoble jargon, in private collections, which accept, sometimes through vanity or weakness, sometimes for ready money, their presence for a time, hung side by side with authentic masterpieces. And they place them in the public collections, in certain museums, never hesitating to arrange a price, or even to present them, to assure for them the official stamp. And while they are busy raising the market price for the small living painter, they lower it for the great dead, buying their work underhand, as a guarantee against the crash which they have always to fear in their other speculations.

"No words could be strong enough to denounce this last and supreme violation of the spirit at the hands of money."


"Vermin" is too kind a word for them.

UN
.

Anonymous said...

The Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia was so religious that he said "the earth is flat and anyone who says otherwise is an apostate who deserves to be killed" (Islam, like Christianity, is a flat earth religion).

Except that Christianity has never been a flat earth religion as ani ful no.

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oo8n0ajOwXo

No more Brother wars between England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Bigger things deserve attention. Immigration, Wars for 'isreal' and the elimination of racial nations, European first.

Anonymous said...

Gem Junior said: “There's no way he is on this site all the time disagreeing about everything we all know is common knowledge, and lecturing everybody, without getting paid. Someone is definitely paying NU for his time because his posts are so numerous, so contrary, and so projoooooooo...”

http://s4.postimg.org/ytyouneb1/Troll.jpg

Every time new opportunities for meddling have arisen he has been immediately involved.

He has demonstrated an uncanny ability to sniff out like a bloodhound anything which is dangerous to him. Having found it, he uses all his cunning to get at it, to divert it, to change its nature, or, at least, to deflect its point from its goal.

We all know that he’s the dregs of mankind, a beast, the great master of the lie. How does he respond? He continues posting 24/7 on Irish Savant’s blog.

Frank Galton

kulak said...

Answer: It doesn't help save the white race.

I agree James.

Some people say we have to rehabilitate Germany/Nazis/Hitler because we'll be called Nazis anyway.

Well, no, we don't have to.

There's enough information out now, easily accessible, for people to uproot the rest of the lies on their own, once they've been hit with mantra.

The (sad? Maybe I once would've thought so) truth is, oppose white genocide, and most Jews will volunteer to be enemies.

AnalogMan said...

James said...

@Everyone,

Sorry guys for polluting the thread with nastiest uncle crap yesterday.


*sigh*

euroserf said...

Frank Galton, 'this constant Holocau$t/Nazi propaganda' is simpy good business. In the financial sense but also as a powerful weapon to preclude criticism of jews. There have been dozens, and more recent, hococausts as bad as or worse than The Holocau$t, but that's the only one we ever hear about.

It's worked like a dream for them. Whites should be doing something similar rather than just complaining about this.

Anonymous said...

I was reading an atricle on how judeo-groups can take control of open debates on sites which oppose them and one of the techniques mentioned was to have teo or more 'hijackers' enter into debate with each other and thus hide key facts about the matter under debate. And then.....guess what: I see an example right before my eyes!


James said...
Frank Galton,

Personally, I have no problem believing that Anne Frank hid from the Nazis (although they probably knew they were there all along), and that her family was split up, and that she died of Typhus in a horrible camp.
(A@A notes that 'James' omits that Anne Frank had previously been at the Auschwitz 'death camp' but miraculously survived it as did all of the Frank family)


Question: Why did the Frank family never go out?
Answer: They were afraid that the Germans would capture them. However, especially in the later years of the war, many Jews were going around completely normally, having obtained false identity papers. The reason the Franks never went out was because they looked too Jewish.


14 April 2013 01:29

Note to 'james': Otto Frank went out often. In fact, Otto Frank went out a lot, but that's because he was conducting business with the Wehrmacht, seeling them pectin. Being jewish however, he couldn't fight his instincts and he attempted to rip them off i.e. swindle the German Army, and that is why the Franks were arrested. Any normal person would think it highly irresponsible for a collaborating jew to attempt to swindle the German Army in the middle of a war, but many or most jews simply aren't normal.

And yes - the diary is a fake. That must disappoint our dynamic jew-oh:

http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=614599


- When Anne allegedly rewrote the diaries, she used a ball point pen, which did not exist in 1945, and the book took on an extremely high literary standard, and read more like a professional documentary than a child's diary. In Anne's second edition her writing style, and handwriting, suddenly matured

The actual diary of Anne Frank contained only about 150 notes, according to The New York Times, of October 2 ,1955. -

- In 1944, German authorities in occupied Holland determined that Otto Frank had been swindling then via his extensive and very lucrative Wehrmacht contracts. The German police then raided his apartment attic, and the eight Jews were sent to Westerbork work camp and forced to perform manual labor .Otto himself was sent to Auschwitz.. Anne, her sister Margot, and her mother, subsequently died of typhus in another camp. -

Note to 'james' - Otto Frank got typhus in Auschwitz but was survived it in the Auschwitz hospital where he was found when the Soviets arrived. Another amazing tale of how death was escaped in the 'death camp'.

Allan@Aberdeen

katana said...

So far there has been 385 comments.

Of those comments:

Nastiest Uncle = 80 comments
James = 81 comments
------------------
Total = 161

In other words, 42% of comments, excluding comments in reaction.

Mission control, we have a quality control problem here.

Savant, please tell commenters to restrain themselves.

Matrix-buster said...

The DM has gone crazy of Holocau$st stories.

What the hell is going on here?

And now they discovered some 'new' atrocities from that period.

Seriously, I don't know what's going on here. Seems to be some kind of a programme. Would love to know tho'

Anonymous said...

"Nastiest Uncle = 80 comments
James = 81 comments
------------------
Total = 161

In other words, 42% of comments, excluding comments in reaction."

***********************************
Krazed Keltic Kabballist said...

"You're gonna have the Hasbaroids hangin' out your arse at every opportunity.... In fact the NA (NU) resplendent in his freedom, is already here!"

***********************************

"Come on people, let's work together on this one -- and try for one week -- to NOT respond to this narcissistic shit-disturber.

This virus needs oxygen to survive, and you're giving it life by mouth-to-mouth resuscitation with every one of your responses. 16:05
"

***********************************
Yes, we could freeze out the virus by allowing himself to chatter with only himself, but do we have the fortified WILL to do so??

This proverbial thorn is but a nuisance whose only intent is to create diversion -- as has been said many previous times. He calls you out, and suckers take the bait with every cast of his kosher line.

Here's the challenge: Prove to us that you're not a kosher robot by simply remaining mute whenever the troll raises its ugly head.

I use this Blog as an exchange of useful information, not to engage in egotist one-upmanship games.

Anyhow ... more research information for the serious scholars:

http://balder.org/judea/Hate-Speech-Laws-Immigration-Jewish-Influence-USA.php








nastiestuncle said...

@katana 11:58

Savant doesn't take orders from you any more.

Anonymous said...

Here we go AGAIN!!!

Justin Bieber pays bizarre tribute to Anne Frank
http://www.scotsman.com/lifestyle/music/news-and-features/justin-bieber-pays-bizarre-tribute-to-anne-frank-1-2894721

Frank Galton

The truth will out said...

Fantastic posting from Anonymous 14 April 2013 13:35
"Nastiest Uncle = 80 comments
James = 81 comments
------------------
Total = 161

In other words, 42% of comments, excluding comments in reaction."

=================================================================================
Every word written, spot on.

I hereby declare my observing this declaration "simply remaining mute whenever the troll raises its ugly head".

On a real high from Di Canio's Sunderland result today.
Miliband wanted to make his appointment political.
I'm ever so glad he did.

It gave me an opportunity to throw out some positive white nationalist propaganda on the back of it on the jewish MSM.

I managed to get my message out on The Daily mail's comments, with a posting that would never normally make it past the admin.

Perhaps riding the wave of Di Canio's association is just one more avenue we can slip in our message.

Then there's the scum that partied on the back of an old lady dying, the time to celebrate for them was when she left office.

For me it's all a propaganda war at this present stage.

The juwes own our media throughout the West, however the internet has redressed the balance somewhat.

Look at what has been achieved in awareness of the jewish problem merely a decade of free information flow, in comparison to the foul demonic jewish mind-control of more than a century.
This is all without any money, our eternal enemies,the Satanic race, spend literally billions on re-enforcing the lies just to keep the gullible goyim in a state of perpetual arrested development.

The drones have been bombarded with lying jewish lies since birth and put through the indoctrination centres that glory in the cultural suicide our our nations, through their jewish programming.

Use whatever you can, no matter how tenuous to get an opportunity to plant the seeds whenever you can.
Whether subtle or as blunt as a sledgehammer, the idea is to get the goyim to think for themselves, perhaps for the first time in their lives...

People are getting more and more receptive to finally hearing an answer to our clear problems we face, it's getting so obvious there's a problem it's embarrassing.


...back to the point

"... more research information for the serious scholars:

http://balder.org/judea/Hate-Speech-Laws-Immigration-Jewish-Influence-USA.php"

Amen brother.

Delenda Est judaica!

Anonymous said...

Hey Mr The truth will out, shouldn't you be touring the UK apologizing to all the white girls you have helped the invaders to rape?

Anonymous said...

Yet more articles re the “Holocau$t”, this time from the years 1897 and 1899.

May 1899: Holocaust
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bk00cVdzQ7Q/T1ffLMmutKI/AAAAAAAA7II/1fEtMQN6Q7Q/s1600/spanishholocaust.gif

May 1897: 6 million
http://radioislam.org/islam/english/revision/sixmillion/six-million-Bar-Kokhba-revolt-1024x538.jpg

Frank Galton

The truth will out said...

Frankfurt School Of White Genocide:

Taken from the brilliant internet harvesting blog that I would class as a necessary must read daily.
Jewish White Genocide Captured On Google Street View



====================================================

Heraclitus said...
11 April 2013 11:25.

"I wonder if your 11 point indictment has, perhaps unwittingly, been developed from a posteriori to a priory rather than the other way around?"

My analysis was the opening statement and closing paragraph, the bullet points was a C&P.
The real truth is far more pervasive and nefarious than it suggests.



Shaunantijihad said...
Re Pope Francis' interview transcript "What is the reference please?"

I stumbled upon it on www.incogman.net
A site, while I could see access it I couldn't post on the past month, and many ISP's in the UK have been firewalled off from, like China is, only most in Britain don't realise it yet.

So I sent it off to a few of my friends before meeting for a drink on Friday and the general consensus was:
a) It's brilliant and for once offers new found hope that the church may take up the sword to the demons
b) Caution over its authenticity
c) who gives a fuck, it's pure propaganda, solid gold too, that I can forward to every Christian on the planet without causing offence.
That was my finding alone.

It appears that it first came to public knowledge when a Manchester based diocese website posted it online.
I think this coincided with a timeline that demonstrates it was posted before he was announced Pope.

It got some attention on some Christian websites, many querying its authenticity, most, at least the majority all praying it was genuine, a small minority of anti-racist Christians (or 'suicidalists' as we should coin them) praying it's not.
It was picked up by one writer in The Telegraph Damian Thompson's DT blog who wrote a hatchet piece basically declaring it false, however another group contacted the Vatican and their response was "that they do not confirm nor deny it".

As far as I'm concerned, the aim of what was said is spot on thus that makes it ideal literature to send out to Christians wherever they are as it uncovers the truth of our world's malaise.
Whether the interview took place or not like this is made all the more amusing by the official non-denial/non-conformation from the Vatican.

This was from an hour or so research on it yesterday while nursing a massive hangover.
I may learn more later.

Anonymous said...

katana said: “So far there has been 385 comments.

Of those comments:

Nastiest Uncle = 80 comments
James = 81 comments”

----------------------

The “Name Game”

http://www.fuckfrance.com/images/i306/215959.7085752624ad01.jpg

Frank Galton

The truth will out said...

Anonymous said...
"Hey Mr The truth will out, shouldn't you be touring the UK apologizing to all the white girls you have helped the invaders to rape?"

14 April 2013 16:08"

Indeed.
My adherence to pointing out the Devil in the detail is a sure fire way to throw the ladies into the arms of the biological weapons sent to destroy us.
Perhaps I should join an antifa organisation to force women to do so by threats of violence or get involved politically to make laws to make is so, rather than warn them off doing so.

It's the intellectual dishonesty with it's ever evolving labyrinthine cul-de-sacs of deceit of the virus that is really is a marvel to behold.

For the first time in our lifetime, the advent of the internet has finally given us some footing on the information flow that has been denied us for nigh on a century now.

Remember ladies, producing children with a negro, condemns your progeny to a life of rootless, soulless servitude to the jew.
Surely it's not too much to ask to want one's children to look as beautiful as you do.

Delenda Est Judaica!

Anonymous said...

So, are you going to apologize to them then or not, since you are part responsible?

Keiser said...

Anonymous said...

So, are you going to apologize to them then or not, since you are part responsible?
14 April 2013 16:36


You forgot to log in NU

Keiser said...

I will lead by example. Not one more comment from me to "James" or "NU".

Watch and see!

Anonymous said...

Remember ladies, producing children with a negro, condemns your progeny to a life of rootless, soulless servitude to the jew.

With the possibility of acquiring a STD that anti-biotics cannot cure.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 400 of 429   Newer› Newest»