Friday, 7 March 2008

Ayatollah Khomenei - a fine Islamic leader

Ayatollah Khomenei of Iran (now thankfully dead, and hopefully residing in the seventh circle of hell) must rank as one of the most evil, malevolent butchers of the 20th century. But then, seeing as he was a regional leader of an evil malevolent cult we shouldn't be surprised.

An example of this can be found in his teachings on sex with infants (that's right!).

Isn't the followings lovely?

"A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. If he penetrates and the child is harmed then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however would not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl's sister."

(The complete Persian text of this saying can be found in "Ayatollah Khomeini in Tahrirolvasyleh, Fourth Edition, Darol Elm, Qom")

I suppose we should be grateful that he opposes penetration, which is good of him. But given that the 'Prophet' was a pedophile as well (had a six year-old 'wife'), we can otherwise understand where he's coming from.

But quite seriously. In the light of this, why don't the world's pedophiles become disciples amd descent on Iran? Seems like Pedo Paradise to me.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Jesus Christ - how sick! I didnt believe ths frst but checked it out. Bring me my machine gun!

John Cook said...

Thats not as bad as the Chosen Ones - they have no problem with penetration as long as the child is under three.
Read the Talmud, if you can stomach it.

Anonymous said...

But given that the 'Prophet' was a pedophile as well (had a six year-old 'wife'

I believe he married his multiple wives, primarily to unite, and bring peace and reconciliation to the forever warring Arab tribes/clans. Also having multiple wives for those warlike tribes and in those times was a form of social welfare to look after all the widows. Good idea if you ask me!

Anybody who has read much about the life of Mohammed, and come to realise his qualities of compassion and the frugal disciplined simple life style he led, would find it difficult to believe and repeat this obvious Jew propaganda.

I don't believe such a man (eg a Paedophile) could unite and inspire the previously primitive Arabs to create their great and enlightened civilisation in the middle east and Spain, while us northern Europeans at that time were still barbarians living in the dark ages.

Read about the great Saladin, and his chivalrous human behaviour in comparison to the barbarity of his Christian Crusader opponents, or how the Jews were allowed back into Jerusalem after previously being banned by the former Byzantium rulers.

What I'm trying to say is that Muslims weren't and aren't all inbred and ignorant Pakistani villagers, the same as not all "Christians" are Schofield bible reading fundamentalists or dogmatic indoctrinated Catholics or Proddie dogs as I remember being called in Middlesbrough as a kid. (second largest Irish diaspora in England after Liverpool)

All religions are equal and of the same value in my humble opinion, It all depends on the input and devotion of the followers, They all have similar results.

I am really unhappy and angry with what the treasonous politicians are allowing to happen to our respective countries, we can't change what's already happened and I can't foresee if the future will bring change for the better. If it continues like this will we have civil war? or will we all eventually just have to get used to living together and be happy, despite what the despicable Zionist's and Marxist Jews have done to us all.

Bobby English said...

"THE ORTHODOX JEWISH TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD”!

The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud published in 1935 was "Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices" by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.', Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the "Foreword" for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.

The world's leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic "The History of the Talmud," Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:

"THE TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence...IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time. IT STILL DOMINATES THE MINDS OF A WHOLE PEOPLE, WHO VENERATE ITS CONTENTS AS DIVINE TRUTH..."

SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: "What is meant by this? - Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? - Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5)."

This "divine truth" which "a whole people venerate" of which "not a single letter of it is missing" and today "is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history" is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:

SANHEDRIN, 55b: "A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea)."

(footnotes) "(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor's wife' is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse."

Bobby English said...

THE ORIGINAL CULT OF PAEDOPHILIA

SANHEDRIN, 69b "Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit...All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.

KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood' ".
(footnotes) "(5). Lit., `says'. (6) Lit., `here', that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years."

KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."(Dildo)
(footnotes) "(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."(Dildo)

ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. "R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it...From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.

SOTAH, 26b. "R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) - the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)...As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?"

Of the "sacred" Talmudic teachings of the "Sages," preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps nothing better illustrates "fools" with "reprobate minds" than the teaching in the Talmud book of Yebamoth that spittle on the top of the bed curtain proves that a wife has been guilty of adultery, as only lying down face upwards could she have spit up on it. Spitting several feet straight up! The Talmud states: "When a peddler leaves a house and the woman within is fastening her sinnar [breech-cloth] … . If spittle is found on the upper part of the curtained bed she must, said Rabbi, go."

Footnote: "Even if there were no witnesses that misconduct took place."
Further footnote: "Only the woman lying face upwards could have spat on the spot. Intercourse may, there fore, be suspected."