Sunday, 23 October 2016

Tell The Truth And Shame The Devil

The brilliant book The Myth Of German Villainy has been much commented on this blog and covered extensively over at katana. I've now just finished an even more dramatic work which explains how behind the scenes, events are controlled by a coterie of ethnic puppet-masters who work their marionettes in high places out of public view. How did this world get to the dark place it is today? Who could have stopped it and what can we now? Given that the author is the son of legendary violinist Yehudi Menuhin and the latest in a long line of rabbis those whom he identifies as 'the coterie of ethnic puppet-masters' will surprise you.

'The book consists of three sections. The first concerns Adolf Hitler, and the real causes leading up to the outbreak of WWII.  The second section enlarges on the activities of the real culprits, provides a historical overview of their progress, their nature, their power over finance and the media, and the methods by which they achieved it. The third concerns the two World Wars, their conception, funding and inescapable continuity; our current laws against freedom of expression, and the evolution of the Orwellian state.'

Not surprisingly the author has suffered greatly for his honesty, losing his job at the Menuhin Foundation and suffering expulsion from polite society. But he fearlessly persists. He is, as a German nationalist writer described him, 'a noble Jew'. And on this point let us spare a thought for the other Jews out there who have taken on their tribe in the pursuit of the truth. There are a lot more of them than you might think. 

Of them I echo Hitler's observation to his family doctor Eduard Bloch. 'If enough Jews were like you there would be no anti-Semitism'.

Please buy this book, read it and proselytise.

Coda: Flanders, one of our top commentators, has sent this link regarding the current terrible situation in Germany, by an author whose German lineage goes back 500 years. Please check it out.

Wednesday, 19 October 2016

Why Syria is being destroyed

The Pipeline Theory is the prevailing explanation for the current destruction of Syria. The theory goes like this: The Saudis and Qataris want to run a gas pipeline to Europe to gain extra market share and to put one over on Putin. The Assad regime refuses to give them right of way, hence he has to go. And if that means the destruction of the country and the deaths of up to a million people, well, too bad.  I never bought into this, not least because they don't need to go through Syria. They could go through Iraq instead. 

Call me a cynic but when the USA starts blowing up Israel's (cough) neighbours my thoughts turn to the Yinon Plan, not pipelines. Lo and behold, confirmation comes via a recent release from Wikileaks of an email between Hildebeaste Clinton and some other State Dept. criminal.

The best way to help Israel deal with Iran's growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria [yeah, right] overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad. Negotiations to limit Iran's nuclear program will not solve Israel's security dilemma. Nor will they stop Iran from improving the crucial part of any nuclear weapons program — the capability to enrich uranium. At best, the talks between the world's major powers and Iran that began in Istanbul this April and will continue in Baghdad in May will enable Israel to postpone by a few months a decision whether to launch an attack on Iran that could provoke a major Mideast war. 

Iran's nuclear program and Syria's civil war may seem unconnected, but they are (sic). For Israeli leaders, the real threat from a nuclear-armed Iran is not the prospect of an insane Iranian leader launching an unprovoked Iranian nuclear attack on Israel that would lead to the annihilation of both countries. What Israeli military leaders really worry about -- but cannot talk about -- is losing their nuclear monopoly. An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. 

The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today. If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself. Back to Syria. It is the strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel's security — not through a direct attack, which in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel has never occurred, but through its proxies in Lebanon, like Hezbollah, that are sustained, armed and trained by Iran via Syria. The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel's leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests. 

Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel's security, it would also ease Israel's understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly. Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted. Right now, it is the combination of Iran's strategic alliance with Syria and the steady progress in Iran's nuclear enrichment program that has led Israeli leaders to contemplate a surprise attack — if necessary over the objections of Washington. With Assad gone, and Iran no longer able to threaten Israel through its, proxies, it is possible that the United States and Israel can agree on red lines for when Iran's program has crossed an unacceptable threshold. 

The United States Government is ZOG. Totally owned by a foreign power.

Saturday, 15 October 2016

Trump skirts the Third Rail

Gladdening the hearts of those of us who feared he had taken the Blue Pill, Trump let rip thusly at a packed meeting in Florida a few days ago.

This is not simply another four-year election, This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we, the people, reclaim control over our government. The political establishment that is trying to stop us is the same group responsible for our disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration, and economic and foreign policies that have bled our country dry. 

This election will determine whether we remain a free country in the truest sense of the word or we become a corrupt banana republic controlled by large donors and foreign governments. Our corrupt political establishment, that is the greatest power behind the efforts at radical globalization and the disenfranchisement of working people. Their financial resources are virtually unlimited, their political resources are unlimited, their media resources are unmatched.

If ever there was a dog-whistle this was it. And the limp-wristed faggots  in the media took the bait. Here's Mother Jones: Many internet users were alarmed at Trump’s language, noting its reliance on anti-Semitic themes and more suited to a fascist dictator than a presidential candidate. Throughout the speech, Trump used harsh language that evoked old and ugly anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about international bankers who supposedly infiltrate national governments and control the global agenda.

What a crazy idea, international bankers who supposedly infiltrate national governments and control the global agenda! But here's a logical response from (((Jonathan Taylor))) on Counterpunch. By making this association, these supposed defenders of the Jews are in fact the ones at risk of fostering anti-Semitism. If “globalists” are conflated with Jews by Jews, then doesn’t that means that globalists ARE Jews? If “international bankers” is a cover for anti-Semitism, than by simple deduction most international bankers must be Jewish! Bringing up anti-Semitism then just reminds people of how much influence and power Jews have. Casually hurling charges of anti-Semitism at critics of globalism is incredibly ill-advised and unhelpful.

Which is why I welcome it! More please. As Chateau Heartiste commentator Matt King observes They can’t snuff us out without a trace now that Trump has “taken the slings and arrows” on our behalf. The paper tiger of the left has been exposed. They cannot intimidate or credibly threaten us anymore. Trump had more to lose than perhaps any of us, and he pushed it all to the center of the table, showing us the way it will be done in the second revolutionary era.

Imagine if we were really about to see the advent of a new and truly revolutionary epoch?

Wednesday, 12 October 2016

"First they came for the straight White men......"

The London Independent  tells us that 'a BBC presenter has condemned the broadcaster’s diversity strategy and claimed he was dismissed from his role for being a “white man”. Jon Holmes, a Bafta-winning writer and comedian who has appeared on Radio 4’s The Now Show for 18 years, claimed bosses let him go after informing him the show was being recast with “more women and diversity”.

In the finest traditions of a Stalinist Show Trial Holmes prefaced his complaint with the following disclaimer:  "I totally understand and agree with ....harder quotas and diversity targets.  Diversity is important. Of course it is. We know it is. That's beyond argument.  But maybe it's time to open up the debate - and, in all honesty, not just because I'm on the receiving end.” Oh ho ho ho Jonny boy. Being on the receiving end is the one and only reason you're belatedly calling for a debate. Whereas I'm not familiar with your work my assumption is that during your current affairs comedy career at the HebeBC you never once called for such a debate. Because had you done so you'd have been out on your ear pronto.

'If we are now openly giving jobs to people based on the colour of their skin, surely that is only emphasising just the kind of social division that the equality that I was brought up to embrace strives to eliminate?  So what if – and I know this is radical – but what if everything and every job in all walks of life was open to everyone equally, and we all just agree that everyone's the same, by which I mean – you know – 'human'?'

Now tell me something Jon. Early in your article (the part where you paraded your PC credentials) you professed yourself in favour of  'harder quotas and diversity targets'. Any chance you'd reconcile this with your wish that 'everything and every job ..... was open to everyone equally, and we all just agree that everyone's the same, by which I mean – you know – 'human'?  You can't, can you? And that's because the two concepts are mutually irreconcilable. You can have diversity quotas - or - you can have appointments based on merit.  It's one or the other. And it's a zero-sum game.

So welcome to the world of the straight White male. Despite what you hear about White Privilege it's not an easy world to live in. In contrast to every other demographic you'll find yourself mocked, abused and ridiculed with impunity. But you know that, don't you? After all you've been doing it yourself for the last 18 years at the Beeb.  And as you search for that new job you'll find to your horror that you're on the lowest rung of the ladder. The top rung - in the country your forbears built - will be occupied by a black transgendered Muslim or some such. 

It's tough. So I'll conclude with a word of advice. Be very careful with all this talk about a 'debate on diversity'. The people who now enforce the law in what was your country might deem such talk to be 'hate crime'. By the way, have you ever heard of the Alt-Right?

Saturday, 8 October 2016

Jewish Boy Privilege: A poem

You surely have come across by now the poem 'White Boy Privilege' by 14 year-old (((Royce Mann))) delivered at his $22,000 a year private school in Atlanta. If not you can get a transcript here. (I recommend the transcript as the actual video will surely induce an attack of projectile vomiting.) Anyway it's come to my attention that little Royce now plans a more narrowly-focused follow-up entitled 'Jew Boy Privilege'. The following is a sneak preview of the first draft.

Dear White people. I'm  sorry for what we did to you. Capitalised on your good nature to surreptitiously steal your country from under you....the institutions and wealth bequeathed to you by your forebears. I'm sorry that we used that power and wealth to turn it into a degenerate hell hole by debasing and corrupting education, entertainment, banking and politics, flooding it with Third World detritus, diverting your blood and treasure to fight my country's wars in the Middle East, for robbing your advanced military technology and selling it to your enemies.

Dear women, I’m sorry that we have transformed you from first rate women into second-rate men, for turning you against your White male kin, for convincing you to abjure your nature by not having families (and for killing your babies should you get pregnant), for  tricking you into believing your 'career' would compensate, and for your inevitable future as barren embittered and lonely cat-ladies.

Dear black people, I’m sorry that my ancestors brought your ancestors over here as slaves in their ships and for maintaining that slave status to this day by reducing you to welfare parasites dependent on productive Whites for your very existence.

I say now that I would change places with you in an instant, but if given the opportunity, would I?

Probably not.   Because to be honest, being privileged is awesome. You see our ethnic network ensures that I'm privileged at every stage of my life while simultaneously enabling me to claim victim status as and when required! How good is that? And should some goy point out the scam we'll destroy him with our time-worn catch-cries of anti-Semitism,  The Holocau$t™ and Hitler.

So White boys, keep acting like women.....White girls, keep acting like men. And become atomised, rootless, androgynous and dumbed down peons. You'll be happy.  Trust me.

Thursday, 6 October 2016

Contrasting tales of tails wagging dogs

Like many others on this blog (and hopefully many more to come) I'm reading The Myth Of German Villainy by Benton Bradberry. As an aside the book reminded me again of the contrasting reactions in Russia and Hungary to their respective Bolshevik takeovers at the end of the Great War. In both countries the Bolshevik leaders were almost entirely Jewish and/or foreign, proportionally their numbers were minuscule, yet they still managed to forcefully subdue the native populations.

Soon after seizing power they unleashed the Red Terror in both countries and worked to destroy everything about their culture and heritage. Not exactly a popularity winning programme! In Russia they were entirely successful while in Hungary their rule lasted only about 100 days. Admittedly the Hungarian people  received significant military assistance from Roumania but it's almost certain that they would have done the job themselves in quick measure anyway.  Germans did an even faster job of liquidating their own Soviets in Bavaria and Berlin.

So how could the Russian people allow a minuscule band of non-Russians take over their enormous country which then suffered hitherto unimaginable levels of bloodshed and destruction? Part of the explanation lies in the Bolsheviks initially stabilising their power by meeting populist demands such as land distribution, worker ownership and of course ending Russia's role in the Great War. While it might be argued that for instance the British and Spanish Empires also took control of vast regions with relatively tiny resources there is a fundamental difference: In their cases the fighting was done by the British and Spanish themselves, albeit with the aid of some natives hostile to the dominant tribes. The natives were directly conquered after military defeat by militarily superior invaders.

But had the Russian people united against their Bolshevik oppressors the latter's end would surely have been swift. Instead there was "a weary capitulation without any spirit, helplessly, with a sense of doom” as Solzhenitsyn described it. Even the powerful Red Army stood by as its office corps was systematically wiped out over a period of a few years. 

Are the Russians of today a different breed? I sure hope so as it could be that they're the White race's only hope.

Coda: A majority of the Bolshevik nomenklatura changed their Jewish names to Russian-sounding alternatives. This surely had a significant impact on the public perception of their project, disguising its essentially Jewish nature. It still goes on to this day, as Jon Liebowitz Stewart knows.

Monday, 3 October 2016

The blessed life of a Moral Crusader

Being a Moral Crusader is a great gig in that you get the best of all worlds, public acclaim and a luxurious lifestyle just for self-righteously calling on others to meet the moral standards that you define. Enter Noam Chomsky who according to Wikipedia "in his youth developed a dislike of capitalism (a "grotesque catastrophe") and the selfish pursuit of material advancement". He laments the increasing inequality resulting from the gutting of finance industry regulation and warns of an "unaccountable and deadly rule by corporations."  But amazingly he's managed to become a highly successful capitalist himself, making millions of dollars through adroit management of Brand Chomsky.

Books represent his biggest earner by far. He churns them out on an industrial scale (they're largely rehashes of earlier speeches and articles) and charges a hefty capitalist price for them.  As he does for his speeches.  If you want to hear him lecture for example on The  Selfish Pursuit Of Material Advancement your university will first have to fork out for the $15,000 fee plus the cost of First Class travel and a five star hotel.  And should you want to download material from his web site you'll be met with this stern warning: "Material on this site is copyrighted by Noam Chomsky and/or Noam Chomsky and his collaborators. No material on this site may be reprinted or posted on other web sites without written permission.

And what about this: Following the 9/11 attacks he discovered that the demand for his learned opinion had, well, exploded. Despite his intense dislike of the "grotesque catastrophe of capitalism" he immediately jacked up his speaking fees by 30%.  Don't you just love that?  And within weeks he'd churned out another book to exploit the disaster, this one purporting to explain its causes and significance. However on closer inspection (after you'd forked out your $40) you'd have learned that it was - yet again - made up of already published material spliced together with some hastily-written linkage text.

At a speech in Philadelphia entitled "Noam Chomsky: Media and Democracy" he told the audience that "a democracy requires a free, independent, and inquiring media." After the speech left-wing 'journalist' Deborah Bolling tried to get an interview with him. No problem...if the "free, independent, and inquiring" reporter first forked out $35 for the privilege!  Clearly he didn't have the likes of her in mind when he wrote "The responsibility of the writer as a moral agent is to bring the truth about matters of human significance to an audience that can do something about them."

And wouldn't you expect him to invest the resultant fortune in a blind trust or better again in green eco-friendly stocks? Maybe, but unfortunately such companies offer poor returns and high risk. Unlike those for example in the military-industrial complex, Big Pharma or the oil companies. But that's not an option given that he sees them as exemplifying the "grotesque catastrophe" of predatory capitalism. Oh wait - one quick intellectual somersault later and he's plunged headlong into their stocks, greatly enriching himself in the process.

And now he strides the intellectual firmament like a colossus, wealthy, feted, admired, a sought-after guest while remaining a champion of the poor and a defender of the environment. The long and happy life of a Moral Crusader. 

(More good stuff on Noam here).