Lady Savant posed an interesting question to me last night. She had been watching a documentary featuring 'fearless investigative journalist Ross Kemp as he travels to Memphis, one of the most segregated cities in the US, to find out why so many African-Americans are worse off today than they were 50 years ago'.Well Ross soon discovered the answer to that: The legacy of segregation. This meant that black Memphis still "suffers from" poverty, low education achievement and stratospheric levels of crime for which it seems African-Americans bear no responsibility. Kemp added that blacks are imprisoned at six times the rate of Whites, the link between crime and punishment apparently too subtle for this investigative journalist to grasp.
Lady Savant's question was direct and interesting: Say Whites finally rebelled against the black plague of crime and dependence what could they actually do in practice?
First you could offer a substantial 'return' to Africa financial inducement. This is not a glib or facile suggestion. I worked out here the average lifetime costs of a black family to White taxpayers to be in the region of €2 million. Given their impulsive short-term gibs- me-dat-now mentality I'd say the majority would jump at the offer of a tax-free 200k cheque. Then there's payment for voluntary sterilisation, which of course would have to be accompanied by changes in welfare, reversing the current system which encourages indiscriminate breeding. What would blacks lose? Could still muh dick to their hearts' content - and their chilluns aren't exactly the centre of their lives anyway.
My final proposal is a return to the kind of rigid race-based authoritarianism that applied in the Post Reconstruction American South up to about 1950 and under apartheid South Africa. Such a regimen was predicated on the correct assumptions that blacks in general were of low intelligence, impulsive and criminally-oriented, rendering them unsuited for White society. The regimen was supported by a range of segregation laws and a no-nonsense police force aided by other less formal enforcement mechanisms. And woe betide any black committing a crime of violence against Whites, especially against White women. (This is a horrific example of what could happen). Miscegenation even where legal (and it often was not) incurred severe social sanctions.
Th net effect was that blacks and Whites developed a modus vivendi, each knowing his place and the rules of engagement. Not ideal or fair, but then what society is? The fact is that black criminality and the welfare drag on productive law-abiding citizens were but a fraction of what they are today. Whites were able to enjoy the civilisation they and their forebears had hewn from the wilderness. Indeed blacks may have been more content than they are now - crazy as that might sound in today's bizarro world - with stable family structures the norm and nobody stoking their grievances.
That these sensible solutions not alone would never be considered but could possible land their author in jail underlines the depth of our civilisational decay.